Efficient Diversification According to Stochastic Dominance Criteria

References

• Aboudi R., Thon D. Efficient algorithms for stochastic dominance tests based on financial market data. Management Sci. (1994) 40(4):508–515Link, Google Scholar
• Afriat S. The construction of a utility function from expenditure data. Internat. Econom. Rev. (1967) 8:67–77Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bawa V. S. Stochastic dominance: A research bibliography. Management Sci. (1982) 28:698–712Link, Google Scholar
• Bawa V. S., Lindenberg E., Rafsky L. An algorithm to determine stochastic dominance admissible sets. Management Sci. (1979) 25(7):609–622Link, Google Scholar
• Bixby R. E. Solving real-world linear programs: A decade and more of progress. Oper. Res. (2002) 50(1):3–15Link, Google Scholar
• Charnes A., Cooper W. W., Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1978) 2(6):429–444Crossref, Google Scholar
• Charnes A., Cooper W. W., Golany B., Seiford L., Stutz J. Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empirical production functions. J. Econometrics (1985) 30(1):91–107Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dybvig P. H., Ross S. A. Portfolio efficient sets. Econometrica (1982) 50(6):1525–1546Crossref, Google Scholar
• Farrell M. J. The measurement of productive efficiency. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. A (1957) 120(3):253–290Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fishburn P. C.Decision and Value Theory (1964) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Fourer R. Linear programming: 2001 software survey. OR/MS Today (2001) 28(4):58–59–68Google Scholar
• Frankfurter G. M., Phillips H. E. Efficient algorithms for conducting stochastic dominance tests on large numbers of portfolios, a comment. J. Financial Quant. Anal. (1975) 10:177–179Crossref, Google Scholar
• French K. R.Kenneth R. French—Data Library (2003) . Accessed September 2, 2003 http://mba.tuck.dartmouth.edu/pages/faculty/ken.french/data_library.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Gavish B. A relaxation algorithm for building undominated portfolios. J. Banking Finance (1977) 1:143–150Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hadar J., Russel W. R. Rules for ordering uncertain prospects. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1969) 59:25–34Google Scholar
• Hardy G. H., Littlewood J. E., Polya G.Inequalities (1934) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.) Google Scholar
• Karlin S., Novikoff A. Generalized convex inequalities. Pacific J. Math. (1963) 1251–1279Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koopmans T. C., Beckmann M. Assignment problems and the location of economic activities. Econometrica (1957) 25:53–76Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kroll Y., Levy H. Sampling errors and portfolio efficient analysis. J. Financial Quant. Anal. (1980) 15:655–688Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuosmanen T. Stochastic dominance efficiency tests under diversification. (2001) (Helsinki, Finland). Working paper W-283 Helsinki School of Economics and Business AdministrationGoogle Scholar
• Levy H. Stochastic dominance and expected utility: Survey and analysis. Management Sci. (1992) 38(4):555–593Link, Google Scholar
• Levy H.Stochastic Dominance: Investment Decision Making Under Uncertainty (1998) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levy H., Hanoch G. Relative effectiveness of efficiency criteria for portfolio selection. J. Financial Quant. Anal. (1970) 5:63–76Crossref, Google Scholar
• Levy H., Wiener Z. Stochastic dominance and prospect dominance with subjective weighting functions. J. Risk Uncertainty (1998) 16(2):147–163Crossref, Google Scholar
• Machina M. J. Expected utility analysis without the independence axiom. Econometrica (1982) 50(2):277–324Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markowitz H. M. Portfolio selection. J. Finance (1952) 12:77–91Google Scholar
• Markowitz H. M.Portfolio Selection (1959) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Markowitz H. M., Levy H., Sarnat M. An algorithm for finding undominated portfolios. Financial Decision Making Under Uncertainty (1977) (Academic Press, New York) 3–10Crossref, Google Scholar
• McFadden D., Fomby T. B., Seo T. K. Testing for stochastic dominance. Studies in the Economics of Uncertainty. In Honor of Josef Hadar (1989) (Springer Verlag, Berlin and New York) 113–134Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mittelmann H. Benchmarks for optimization software. (2003) . Accessed September 1, 2003 http://plato.la.asu.edu/bench.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Nelson R. D., Pope R. Bootstrapping insights into empirical applications of stochastic dominance. Management Sci. (1991) 37:1182–1194Link, Google Scholar
• Neumann J. von, Kuhn H. W., Tucker A. W. A certain zero-sum two-person game equivalent to the optimal assignment problem. Contributions to the Theory of Games (1953) II(Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) 5–12Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neumann J. von, Morgenstern O.Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (1944) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
• Peleg B., Yaari M. E. A price characterization of efficient random variables. Econometrica (1975) 43(2):283–292Crossref, Google Scholar
• Performance World (2003) . GAMS Development Corp. Accessed August 31, 2003 http://www.gamsworld.org/performance/plib/size.htmGoogle Scholar
• Porter R. B., Pfaffenberger R. C. Efficient algorithms for conducting stochastic dominance tests on large numbers of portfolios: Reply. J. Financial Quant. Anal. (1975) 10:181–185Crossref, Google Scholar
• Porter R. B., Wart J. R., Ferguson D. L. Efficient algorithms for conducting stochastic dominance tests on large numbers of portfolios. J. Financial Quant. Anal. (1973) 8:71–82Crossref, Google Scholar
• Post G. T. Empirical tests for stochastic dominance efficiency. J. Finance (2003a) 58(5):1905–1931Crossref, Google Scholar
• Post G. T. Asset pricing and omitted moments: A stochastic dominance analysis of market efficiency. Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM). (2003b) (Rotterdam, The Netherlands)Google Scholar
• Quirk J., Saposnik R. Admissibility and measurable utility functions. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1962) 29:140–146Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rockafellar R. T.Convex Analysis (1970) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rothschild M., Stiglitz J. E. Increasing risk I: A definition. J. Econom. Theory (1970) 2:225–243Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmeidler D. A bibliographical note on a theorem of Hardy, Littlewood, and Polya. J. Econom. Theory (1979) 20:125–128Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schmid F., Trede M. Testing for first-order stochastic dominance: A new distribution free test. Statistician (1996) 45(3):371–380Crossref, Google Scholar
• Starmer C. Developments in non-expected utility theory: The hunt for a descriptive theory of choice under risk. J. Econom. Lit. (2000) 38(2):332–382Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stiglitz J. The allocation role of the stock market: Pareto optimality and competition. J. Finance (1981) 36(2):235–251Crossref, Google Scholar
• Varian H. Nonparametric tests of models of investor behavior. J. Financial Quant. Anal. (1983) 18:269–278Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ziemba W. T., Whitmore G. A., Findlay M. C. Portfolio applications: Computational aspects. Stochastic Dominance: An Approach to Decision-Making Under Risk (1978) (D.C. Heath, Lexington, MA) 199–260Google Scholar