The Optimal Timing of Living-Donor Liver Transplantation

References

• Ahn J. H., Hornberger J. Involving patients in the cadaveric kidney transplant allocation process: A decision-theoretic perspective. Management Sci. (1996) 42:629–641Link, Google Scholar
• Alagoz O., Bryce C. L., Schaefer A. J., Angus D. C., Roberts M. S. Predicting the future health states of liver disease patients using empirical stochastic models. Medical Decision Making (2002) 22(6):541Google Scholar
• Barlow R. E., Proschan F.Mathematical Theory of Reliability (1965) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Carton B. Doctors, U.S. government move closer to backing payment when organs are donated. The Wall Street Journal (2002) February 14):B1Google Scholar
• Chen M., Feldman R. M. Optimal replacement policies with minimal repair and age-dependent costs. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1997) 98:75–84Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chew S., Ho J. L. Hope: An empirical study of attitudes toward the timing of uncertainty resolution. J. Risk Uncertainty (1994) 151:949–953Google Scholar
• Coalition on Donation (COD) How to be a living donor. (2004) . Retrieved February 15, 2004 http://www.donatelife.netGoogle Scholar
• Cox D. R. Regression models in life tables (with discussion). J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B (1972) 34:187–220Google Scholar
• David I., Yechiali U. A time-dependent stopping problem with application to live organ transplants. Oper. Res. (1985) 33:491–504Link, Google Scholar
• David I., Yechiali U. One attribute sequential assignment match processes in discrete time. Oper. Res. (1995) 43:879–884Link, Google Scholar
• Derman C. On sequential control rules and Markov chains. Management Sci. (1962) 9(1):16–24Link, Google Scholar
• Derman C., Bellman R. On optimal replacement rules when changes of state are Markovian. Mathematical Optimization Techniques (1963a) (The RAND Corporation, Berkeley, CA) 201–210Google Scholar
• Derman C. Optimal replacement and maintenance under Markovian deterioration with probability bounds on failure. Management Sci. (1963b) 9(3):478–481Link, Google Scholar
• Dienstag J. L., Isselbacher K. J., Braunwald E., Fauci A., Kasper D. L., Hauser S. L., Longo D. L., Jameson J. L. Acute viral hepatitis. Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine (2001) (McGraw-Hill, New York) 1721–1736Ch. 295Google Scholar
• Eisenberg J. M. Clinical economics. A guide to the economic analysis of clinical practices. J. Amer. Medical Assoc. (1989) 262(20):2879–2886Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gold M. R., Siegel J. E., Russell B., Weinstein M. C.Cost Effectiveness in Health and Medicine (1996) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Harrison J. M., Taksar M. I. Instantaneous control of a Brownian motion. Math. Oper. Res. (1983) 8(3):439–453Link, Google Scholar
• Hashikura Y., Kawasaki S., Miyagawa S., Terada M., Ikegami T., Nakazawa Y., Urata K., Chisuwa H., Ogino S., Makuuchi M., et al. Recent advance in living donor liver transplantation. World J. Surgery (2002) 26(2):243–246Crossref, Google Scholar
• Health-Alliance Liver transplant FAQs. (2004) . Retrieved May 18, 2004 http://www.health-alliance.com/Google Scholar
• Hornberger J., Ahn J. H. Deciding eligibility for transplantation when a donor kidney becomes available. Medical Decision Making (1997) 17:160–170Crossref, Google Scholar
• Howard D. Why do transplant surgeons turn down organs? A model of the accept/reject decision. J. Health Econom. (2002) 21:957–969Crossref, Google Scholar
• IALOD Living liver donation. (2002) . Retrieved February 25, 2002 http://www.livingdonorsonline.orgGoogle Scholar
• Institute of Medicine (IOM) Organ procurement and transplantation. (1999) . National Academy Press, Washington, D.C. http://www.iom.edu/Google Scholar
• Malinchoc M., Kamath P. S., Gordon F. D., Peine C. J., Rank J., terBorg P. C. A model to predict poor survival in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts. Hepatology (2000) 31:864–871Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marcus A. D. Extreme transplants. The Wall Street Journal (2003) May 6):D1Google Scholar
• Mayo ClinicRetrieved May 18, 2004 http://www.mayo.edu/Google Scholar
• Nishizaki T., Hiroshige S., Ikegami T., Uchiyama H., Hashimoto K., Soejima Y., Shimada M. Living-donor liver transplantation for fulminant hepatic failure in adult patients with a left-lobe graft. Surgery (2002) 131:182–189Crossref, Google Scholar
• Okie S. Organ exchanges push boundaries; new tactics to attract living donors raise issues of ethics and altruism. The Washington Post (2001) June 9):10Google Scholar
• Pierskalla W. P., Voelker J. A. A survey of maintenance models: The control and surveillance of deteriorating systems. Naval Res. Logist. Quart. (1976) 23:353–388Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podolsky D., Isselbacher K. J., Braunwald E., Fauci A., Kasper D. L., Hauser S. L., Longo D. L., Jameson J. L. Cirrhosis and alcoholic liver disease. Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine (2001) (McGraw-Hill, New York) 1752–1753Ch. 298Google Scholar
• Puterman M. L.Markov Decision Processes (1994) (John Wiley and Sons, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Righter R. A resource allocation problem in a random environment. Oper. Res. (1989) 37:329–338Link, Google Scholar
• Roberts M. S., Angus D. C., Weissfeld L., Bryce C. L., Valenta Z. Survival after liver transplantation in the United States: A disease-specific analysis of the UNOS database. Liver Transplantation (2004) 10(7):886–889Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenfield D. Markovian deterioration with uncertain information. Oper. Res. (1976) 24(1):141–155Link, Google Scholar
• Russo M. W., Brown R. S. Ethical issues in living donor liver transplantation. Current Gastroenterology Rep. (2003) 5:26–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Su X., Zenios S. Allocation of kidneys to autonomous transplant candidates: A sequential stochastic assignment model. Oper. Res. (2002) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
• Topkis D. M. Supermodularity and Complementary. (1998) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
• Trotter J. F., Stolpman N., Wachs M., Bak T., Kugelmas M., Kam I., Everson G. T. Living donor liver transplant recipients achieve relatively higher immunosuppressant blood levels than cadaveric recipients. Liver Transplantation (2002) 8(3):212–218Crossref, Google Scholar
• United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Organ distribution: Allocation of livers. (2004a) . Retrieved February 24, 2004 http://www.unos.orgGoogle Scholar
• United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) View data sources. (2004b) . Retrieved February 24, 2004 http://www.unos.orgGoogle Scholar
• Valdez-Flores C., Feldman R. M. A survey of preventive maintenance models for stochastically deteriorating single-unit systems. Naval Res. Logist. (1989) 36:419–446Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weinstein M. C., Stason W. B. Foundations of cost-effectiveness analysis for health and medical practices. New England J. Medicine (1977) 296(13):716–721Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weiss H. J. The computation of optimal control limits for a queue with batch services. Management Sci. (1979) 25(4):320–328Link, Google Scholar
• Wiesner R. H., McDiarmid S. V., Kamath P. S., Edwards E. B., Malinchoc M., Kremers W. K., Krom R. A. F., Kim W. R. MELD and PELD: Application of survival models to liver allocation. Liver Transplantation (2001) 1:567–580Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zenios S. A., Wein L. M., Chertow G. M. Evidence-based organ allocation. Amer. J. Medicine (1999) 107:52–61Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zenios S. A., Chertow G. M., Wein L. M. Dynamic allocation of kidneys to candidates on the transplant waiting list. Oper. Res. (2000) 48:549–569Link, Google Scholar