Comments on “A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables The Bass Model”
Published Online:1 Dec 2004https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1040.0300
References
- A dynamic model of market share and sales behavior. Proc. Winter Conf. (1963) (Amer. Marketing Assoc, Chicago IL) Google Scholar
- A new product growth model for consumer durables. (1966) . Working paper, Institute for Research in the Behavioral, Economic, and Management Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, INGoogle Scholar
- A new product growth for model consumer durables. Management Sci. (1969) 15(5):215–227Link, Google Scholar
- The relationship between diffusion rates experience curves, and demand elasticities for consumer durable technological innovations. J. Bus. (1980) 53(1):51–67Crossref, Google Scholar
- Empirical generalizations and marketing science: A personal view. Marketing Sci. (1995) 14(3 Part 2 of 2):G6–G19Link, Google Scholar
- IT waves: Two completed generational diffusion models. (2004) . Working paper, School of Management, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TXGoogle Scholar
- Why the bass model fits without decision variables. Marketing Sci. (1994) 13(3):203–233Link, Google Scholar
- DIRECTV: Forecasting diffusion of a new technology prior to product launch. Interfaces (2001) 31(3, Part 2 of 2):S82–S93Link, Google Scholar
- Predicting behavior from intention-to-buy measures: The parametric case. J. Marketing Res. (1995) 33(2):176–191Crossref, Google Scholar
- , Mahajan V., Muller E., Wind Y. Multi-market and global diffusion. New-Product Diffusion Models (2000) (Kluwer, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
- Empirical marketing generalization using meta-analysis. Marketing Sci. (1995) 14(3, Part 2 of 2):G36–G46Link, Google Scholar
- Talk of the network: A complex systems look at the underlying process of “word-of-mouth.”. Marketing Lett. (2001) 12:209–221Crossref, Google Scholar
- Riding the saddle: How cross-market communications can create a major slump in sales. J. Marketing (2002) 66(1):1–16Crossref, Google Scholar
- From density to destiny: Using spatial dimension of sales data for early prediction of new product success. Marketing Sci. (2004) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
- Adjusting stated intentions measures to predict trial purchase of new products: A comparison of models and methods. J. Marketing Res. (1989) 26(3):336–345Crossref, Google Scholar
- Virtual bass model and the left-hand data-truncation bias in product diffusion studies. (2004) . Working paper, School of Management, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TXGoogle Scholar
- On the reliability and predictive validity of purchase intention measures. Marketing Sci. (1982) 1(2):243–286Link, Google Scholar
- Impact of a late entrant on the diffusion of a new product/service. J. Marketing Res. (2000) 37(2):269–278Crossref, Google Scholar
- Multinational diffusion models: A new framework. Marketing Sci. (2002) 21(3):318–330Link, Google Scholar
- Diffusion of new products: Empirical generalizations and managerial uses. Marketing Sci. (1995) 14(3, Part 2 of 2):G79–G88Link, Google Scholar
- Mahajan V., Muller E., Wind Y.New-Product Diffusion Models (2000) (Kluwer, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
- Purchase intentions and purchase behavior. J. Marketing (1979) 43(1):141–159Google Scholar
- The marketing department in Management Science: Its history, contributions, and the future. Management Sci. (2004) 50(4):425–428Link, Google Scholar
- A stochastic formulation of the bass model of new-product diffusion. Math. Problems Engrg. (2002) 8(3):249–263Crossref, Google Scholar
- A diffusion theory model of adoption and substitution for successsive generations of high-technology products. Management Sci. (1987) 33(9):1069–1086Link, Google Scholar
- Evolution of technological change: The law of capture. Sloan Management Rev. (1992) 33(2):66–77Google Scholar
- Dynamic price models for new product planning. Management Sci. (1975) 21(6):1113–1122Link, Google Scholar
- Diffusion of Innovations (1962) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
- Meta-analysis applications of diffusion models. J. Marketing Res. (1990) 27(1):70–77Crossref, Google Scholar

