Simulation of the New Product Development Process for Performance Improvement

References

• AitSahlia F. E., Johnson P. W. Is concurrent engineering always a sensible proposition? IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (1995) 42(2):166–170Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banks J., Carson J., Nelson B., Nicol D.Discrete-Event System Simulation (2001) 3rd ed.(Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
• Bhuiyan N. Dynamic models of concurrent engineering processes and performance. Department of Mechanical Engineering (2001) . Ph.D. thesis, McGill University, Montréal, Quebéc, CanadaGoogle Scholar
• Burton R. M., Obel B. The validity of computational models in organization science: From model realism to purpose of the model. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory (1995) 1(1):57–71Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carley K. Validating computational models. (1996) (The Heinz School, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA) Google Scholar
• Clark K. B., Fujimoto T.Product Development Performance (1991) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Clausing D.Total Quality Development (1994) (ASME Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Cooper R. G. Third generation new product processes. J. Product Innovation Management (1994) 11(1):3–14Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper R. G., Kleinschmidt E. J. Determinants of timeliness in product development. J. Product Innovation Management (1994) 11(5):381–396Crossref, Google Scholar
• Datar S., Jordan C., Kekre S., Rajiv S., Srinivasan K. New product development structures and time-to-market. Management Sci. (1997) 43(4):452–464Link, Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt K. M., Tabrizi B. N. Accelerating adaptive processes: Product innovation in the global computer industry. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995) 40(1):84–110Crossref, Google Scholar
• Galbraith J.Designing Complex Organizations (1973) (Addison-Wesley, Reading MA) Google Scholar
• Gerwin D., Barrowman N. J. An evaluation of research on integrated product development. Management Sci. (2002) 48(7):938–953Link, Google Scholar
• Ha A. Y., Porteus E. L. Optimal timing of reviews in concurrent design for manufacturability. Management Sci. (1995) 41(9):1431–1447Link, Google Scholar
• Hull F., Collins P., Liker J. Composite forms of organization as a strategy for concurrent engineering effectiveness. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (1996) 43(2):133–142Crossref, Google Scholar
• Iansiti M. Technology integration: Managing technological evolution in a complex environment. Res. Policy (1995) 24(2):521–542Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jin Y., Levitt R. E. The virtual design team: A computational model of project organizations. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory (1996) 2(3):171–196Crossref, Google Scholar
• Joglekar N. R., Yassine A. A., Eppinger S. D., Whitney D. E. Performance of coupled product development activities with a deadline. Management Sci. (2001) 47(12):1605–1620Link, Google Scholar
• Krishnan V. S. D. Managing the simultaneous execution of coupled phases in concurrent product development. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (1996) 43(2):210–217Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krishnan V. S. D., Eppinger S. D., Whitney D. E. A model-based framework to overlap product development activities. Management Sci. (1997) 43(4):437–451Link, Google Scholar
• Levitt R. E., Thomsen J., Christiansen T. R., Kunz J. C., Lin Y., Nass C. Simulating project work processes and organizations: Toward a micro-contingency theory of organizational design. Management Sci. (1999) 45(11):1479–1495Link, Google Scholar
• Loch C., Terwiesch C. Communication and uncertainty in concurrent engineering. Management Sci. (1998) 44(8):1032–1047Link, Google Scholar
• Nihtila J. R&D-Production integration in the early phases of new product development projects. J. Engrg. Tech. Management (1999) 16(1):55–81Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott S. G. Social identification effects in product and process development teams. J. Engrg. Tech. Management (1997) 14(2):97–127Crossref, Google Scholar
• Smith P., Reinertsen D.Developing Products in Half the Time (1998) (John Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
• Swink M. L., Sandvig J. C., Mabert V. A. Customizing concurrent engineering processes: Five case studies. J. Product Innovation Management (1996) 13(3):229–244Crossref, Google Scholar
• Terwiesch C., Loch C. H. Measuring the effectiveness of overlapping development activities. Management Sci. (1999) 45(4):455–465Link, Google Scholar
• Thomke S., Fujimoto T. The effect of front-loading problem-solving on product development performance. J. Product Innovation Management (2000) 17(2):128–142Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thomsen J., Levitt R. E., Kunz J. C., Nass C. I., Fridsma D. B. A trajectory for validating computational emulation models of organizations. Comput. Math. Organ. Theory (1999) 5(4):385–401Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wheelwright S. C., Clark K. B.Revolutionizing Product Development: Quantum Leaps in Speed, Efficiency and Quality (1992) (The Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Yassine A., Chelst K., Falkenburg D. A decision analytic framework for evaluating concurrent engineering. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (1999) 46(2):144–157Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zirger B. J., Hartley J. L. The effect of acceleration techniques on product span time. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (1996) 43(2):143–152Crossref, Google Scholar