Order Quantity and Timing Flexibility in Supply Chains: The Role of Demand Characteristics

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0359

References

  • Aviv Y. The effect of collaborative forecasting on supply chain performance. Management Sci. (2001) 45(2):178–191Google Scholar
  • Aviv Y., Federgruen A. Stochastic inventory models with limited production capacity and periodically varying parameters. Probab. Engrg. Inform. Sci. (1997) 11(2):107–135CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aviv Y., Federgruen A. The operational benefits of information sharing and vendor managed inventory (VMI) programs. (1998) . Working paper, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, and Columbia University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  • Azoury K. S. Bayes solution to dynamic inventory models under unknown demand distribution. Management Sci. (1985) 31(9):1150–1160LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Azoury K. S., Miller B. L. A comparison of the optimal ordering levels of Bayesian and non-Bayesian inventory models. Management Sci. (1984) 30(8):993–1003LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cachon G. P., Fisher M. Supply chain inventory management and the value of shared information. Management Sci. (2000) 48(8):1032–1048LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen F. Echelon reorder points, installation reorder points, and the value of centralized demand information. Management Sci. (1998a) 44(12, part 2):S221–LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen F., Tayur S., Ganeshan R., Magazine M. On (R, nQ) policies in serial inventory systems. Quantitative Models for Supply Chain Management (1998b) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA) 71–109Google Scholar
  • Chen F., de Kok A. G., Graves S. C. Information sharing and supply chain coordination. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science (2003) 11(Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) 341–421CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen F., Song J. Optimal policies for multiechelon inventory problems with Markov-modulated demand. Oper. Res. (2001) 49(2):226–234LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dornier P. P., Ernst R., Fender M., Kouvelis P.Global Operations and Logistics: Text and Cases (1998) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Eppen G. D., Iyer A. V. Improved fashion buying using Bayesian updates. Oper. Res. (1997a) 45(6):805–819LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Eppen G. D., Iyer A. V. Backup agreements in fashion buying—The value of upstream flexibility. Management Sci. (1997b) 43(11):1469–1484LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fisher M. What is the right supply chain for your product? Harvard Bus. Rev. (1997) 75(2):28–40Google Scholar
  • Fisher M., Raman A. Reducing the cost of demand uncertainty through accurate response to early sales. Oper. Res. (1996) 44(1):87–99LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gavirneni S., Tayur S., Tayur S., Ganeshan R., Magazine M. Value of information sharing and comparison with delayed differentiation. Quantitative Models for Supply Chain Management (1999) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA) 441–466CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gavirneni S., Kapuscinski R., Tayur S. Value of information in capacitated supply chains. Management Sci. (1999) 45(1):16–24LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Graves S. C. A single-item inventory model for a non-stationary demand process. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (1999) 45(1):50–61LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gullu R. A two-echelon allocation model and the value of information under correlated forecasts and demands. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1997) 99:386–400CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harrison J. M.Brownian Motion and Stochastic Flow Systems (1985) (Krieger Publishing, Malabar, FL) Google Scholar
  • Hausman W., Peterson R. Multiproduct production scheduling for style goods with limited capacity, forecast revisions and terminal delivery. Management Sci. (1972) 18(7):370–383LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hayes R. (1995) (Harvard University, Cambridge, MA) . Kanebo Ltd. Harvard Business School Case No. 691-105Google Scholar
  • Heath D. C., Jackson P. L. Modeling the evolution of demand forecasts with application to safety stock analysis in production/distribution systems. IIE Trans. (1994) 26(3):17–30CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iglehart D. The dynamic inventory problem with unknown demand distribution. Management Sci. (1964) 10(3):429–440LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Iyer A. V., Bergen M. Quick response in manufacturer-retailer channels. Management Sci. (1997) 43(4):559–570LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kapuscinski R., Tayur S. A capacitated production-inventory model with periodic demand. Oper. Res. (1998) 46(6):899–911LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lee H. L., So K. C., Tang C. S. The value of information sharing in a two-level supply chain. Management Sci. (2000) 46(5):626–643LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lerche H. R.Boundary Crossing of Brownian Motion (1986) (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lovejoy W. S. Myopic policies for some inventory models with uncertain demand distribution. Management Sci. (1990) 36(6):724–738LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Milner J. M., Kouvelis P. On the complementary value of accurate demand information and production and supplier flexibility. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2002) 4(2):99–113LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Moinzadeh K. A multi-echelon inventory system with information exchange. Management Sci. (2002) 48(3):414–426LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Moinzadeh Y., Bassok Y. An inventory/distribution model with information sharing between the buyer and the supplier. (1998) . Working paper, School of Business, University of Washington, Seattle, WAGoogle Scholar
  • Nahmias S.Production and Operations Analysis (2001) (McGraw-Hill Irwin, New York) Google Scholar
  • Ross S. M.Stochastic Processes (1983) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Scarf H. Bayes solution of the statistical inventory problem. Ann. Math. Statist. (1959) 30:490–508CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sethi S., Cheng F. Optimality of (s, S) policies in inventory models with Markovian demands. Oper. Res. (1997) 45(6):931–939LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Simchi-Levi D., Kaminsky P., Simchi-Levi E.Designing and Managing Supply Chain: Concepts, Strategies and Case Studies (2000) (Irwin-McGraw Hill, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Whang S., Lee H., Ho T.-H., Tang C. S. Value of postponement. Product Variety Management: Research Advances (1998) (Kluwer, Boston, MA) 65–84CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.