Individual Experience and Experience Working Together: Predicting Learning Rates from Knowing Who Knows What and Knowing How to Work Together

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0366

References

  • Adler P. S., Clark K. B. Behind the learning curve: A sketch of the learning process. Management Sci. (1991) 37:267–281LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Alchain A. Reliability of progress curves in airframe production. Econometrica (1963) 31:679–693CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L.Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining, and Transferring Knowledge (1999) (Kluwer, Norwell, MA) Google Scholar
  • Argote L., Epple D. Learning curves in manufacturing. Science (1990) 247:920–924CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L., Beckman S. L., Epple D. The persistence and transfer of learning in industrial settings. Management Sci. (1990) 36:140–154LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Argote L., McEvily B., Reagans R. Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Sci. (2003) 49:571–582LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bailey C. D. Forgetting and the learning curve: A laboratory study. Management Sci. (1989) 35:340–352LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Baum J. A. C., Ingram P. Survival-enhancing learning in the Manhattan hotel industry, 1898–1980. Management Sci. (1998) 44:996–1016LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Benkard C. L. Learning and forgetting: The dynamics of aircraft production. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2000) 90:1034–1054CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bryk A., Raudenbush S.Hierarchical Linear Models (1992) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) Google Scholar
  • Carley K. Organizational learning and personnel turnover. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3:20–46LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Darr E., Argote L., Epple D. The acquisition, transfer and depreciation of knowledge in service organizations: Productivity in franchises. Management Sci. (1995) 41:1750–1762LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Delaney P. F., Reder L. M., Staszewski J. J., Ritter F. E. The strategy-specific nature of improvement: The power law applies by strategy within task. Psych. Sci. (1998) 9:1–7CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dutton J. M., Thomas A. Treating progress functions as a managerial opportunity. Acad. Management Rev. (1984) 9:235–247CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson A., Bohmer R., Pisano G. Disrupted routines: Team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2001) 46:685–716CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edmondson A., Winslow A., Bohmer R., Pisano G. Learning how and learning what: Effects of tacit and codified knowledge on performance improvement following technology adoption. Decision Sci. (2003) 34:197–223CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Epple D., Argote L., Devadas R. Organizational learning curves: A method for investigating intra-plant transfer of knowledge acquired through learning by doing. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:58–70CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Epple D., Argote L., Murphy K. An empirical investigation of the microstructure of knowledge acquisition and transfer through learning by doing. Oper. Res. (1996) 44:77–86LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Faraj S., Sproull L. Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Management Sci. (2000) 46:1554–1568LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Graham C. H., Gagne R. M. The acquisition, extinction and spontaneous recovery of a conditioned operant response. J. Experiment. Psych. (1940) 26:251–280CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hatch N., Mowery D. Process innovation and learning by doing in semiconductor manufacturing. Management Sci. (1998) 44:1461–1477LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Haunschild P. R., Sullivan B. N. Learning from complexity: Effects of prior accidents and incidents on airlines’ learning. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2002) 47:609–643CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hofmann D., Gavin M. Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: Implications for research in organizations. J. Management (1998) 24:623–641Google Scholar
  • Ingram P., Baum J. A. C. Interorganizational learning. The Blackwell Companion to Organizations (2002) (Blackwell Business, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
  • Ittner C. D., Nagar V., Rajan M. V. An empirical examination of dynamic quality-based learning models. Management Sci. (2001) 47:563–578LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Katz J., Losina E., Barrett J., Phillips C., Mahomed N., Lew R., Guadagnoli E., Harris W., Poss R., Baron J. Association between hospital and surgeon procedure volume and outcomes of total hip replacement in the United States Medicare population. J. Bone Joint Surgery (2001) 83:1622–1629CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kelsey S. F., Mullin S. M., Detre K. M., Mitchell H., Cowley M. J., Gruentzig A. R., Kent K. M. Effect of investigator experience on percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Amer. J. Cardiology (1984) 53:56C–64CCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lapré M. A., van Wassenhove L. N. Creating and transferring knowledge for productivity improvement in factories. Management Sci. (2001) 47:1311–1325LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Larson J. R., Christensen C., Abbott A. S., Franz T. M. Diagnosing groups: Charting the flow of information in medical decision-making teams. J. Personality Social Psych. (1996) 71:315–330CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lewis K. Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: Scale development and validation. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88(4):587–604CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liang D. W., Moreland R., Argote L. Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating role of transactive memory. Personality Social Psych. Bull. (1995) 21:384–393CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lieberman M. B. The learning curve, diffusion, and competitive strategy. Strategic Management J. (1987) 8:441–452CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Littell R. C., Milliken G. A., Stroup W. W., Wolfinger R. D.SAS System for Mixed Models (1996) (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC) Google Scholar
  • Moreland R. L., Argote L., Krishnan R., Nye J. L., Brower A. M. Socially shared cognition at work: Transactive memory and group performance. What’s So Social About Social Cognition? Social Cognition Research in Small Groups (1996) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) 57–84CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Newell A., Rosenbloom P. S., Anderson J. R. Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice. Cognitive Skills and Their Acquisition (1981) (Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ) 1–55Google Scholar
  • Nezlek J., Zyzniewski L. Using hierarchical linear modeling to analyze grouped data. Group Dynam. (1998) 2:313–320CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pisano G. P. Knowledge, integration, and the locus of learning: An empirical analysis of process development. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15:85–100CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pisano G. P., Bohmer M. J., Edmondson A. C. Organizational differences in rates of learning: Evidence from the adoption of minimally invasive cardiac surgery. Management Sci. (2001) 47:752–768LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rapping L. Learning and World War II production functions. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1965) 47:81–86CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Raudenbush S., Bryk A. A hierarchical model for studying school effects. Soc. Ed. (1986) 59:1–17CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shafer S. M., Nembhard D. A., Uzumeri M. V. The effects of worker learning, forgetting, and heterogeneity on assembly line productivity. Management Sci. (2001) 47:1639–1653LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schulz M., Baum J. A. C. Organizational learning. The Blackwell Companion to Organizations (2002) (Blackwell Business, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
  • Terwiesch C., Bohn R. E. Learning and process improvement during production ramp-up. Internat. J. Production Econom. (2001) 70:1–19CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thorndike E. L. Animal intelligence: An experimental study of the associative processes in animals. Psych. Rev. Ser. Monogr. Supplements (1898) 2:1–109Google Scholar
  • Thurstone L. L. The learning curve equation. Psych. Monogr. (1919) 26:1–51Google Scholar
  • Uzzi B. Sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations. Amer. Sociological Rev. (1996) 61:674–698CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42:35–67CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B., Lancaster R. Relational embeddedness and learning: The case of bank loan managers and their clients. Management Sci. (2003) 49:383–399LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Weber R. A., Camerer C. Cultural conflict and merger failure: An experimental approach. Management Sci. (2003) 49:400–415LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wegner D. M., Mullen B., Goethals G. R. Transactive memory: A contemporary analysis of the group mind. Theories of Group Behavior (1986) (Springer-Verlag, New York) 185–205Google Scholar
  • Wegner D. M. A computer network model of human transactive memory. Social Cognition (1995) 13:319–339CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wright T. P. Factors affecting the costs of airplanes. J. Aeronautical Sci. (1936) 3:122–128CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zander U., Kogut B. Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6:76–92LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Zhou X. Economic transformation and income inequality in urban China: Evidence from panel data. Amer. J. Sociology (2000) 105:1135–1174CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.