Detecting Regime Shifts: The Causes of Under- and Overreaction

References

• Ballinger T. Parker, Wilcox Nathanial T. Decisions, error and heterogeneity. Econom. J. (1997) 106:1090–1105Google Scholar
• Barberis Nicholas, Shleifer Andrei, Vishny Robert. A model of investor sentiment. J. Financial Econom. (1998) 49:307–343Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barry Donald M., Pitz Gordon F. Detection of change in nonstationary, random sequences. Organ. Behavior Human Performance (1979) 24:111–125Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhide Amar. The Origin and Evolution of New Businesses (2000) (Oxford University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bloomfield Robert, Hales Jeffrey. Predicting the next step of a random walk: Experimental evidence of regime-shifting beliefs. J. Financial Econom. (2002) 65:397–414Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brenner Lyle. Should observed overconfidence be dismissed as a statistical artifact?: Critique of Erev, Wallsten, and Budescu (1994). Psych. Rev. (2000) 107:943–946Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brenner Lyle, Griffin Dale, Koehler Derek J. Modeling patterns of probability calibration and random support theory: Diagnosing case-based judgement. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (2005) 97:64–81Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brier Glenn W. Verification of forecasts expressed in terms of probability. Monthly Weather Rev. (1950) 78:1–3Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown Eric R., Bane Alice L. Probability estimation in a chance task with changing probabilities. J. Experiment. Psych. Human Perception Performance (1975) 1:183–187Crossref, Google Scholar
• Budescu David V., Erev Ido, Wallsten Thomas S. On the importance of random error in the study of probability judgment part I: New theoretical developments. J. Behavioral Decision Making (1997) 10:157–171Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer Colin F., Ho Teck-Hua. Violations of the betweenness axiom and nonlinearity in probability. J. Risk Uncertainty (1994) 8:167–196Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chinnis James O., Peterson Cameron R. Inference about a nonstationary process. J. Experiment. Psych. (1968) 77:620–625Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chinnis James O., Peterson Cameron R. Nonstationary processes and conservative inference. J. Experiment. Psych. (1970) 84:248–251Crossref, Google Scholar
• Crown Judith, Coleman Glenn. No Hands: The Rise and Fall of the Schwinn Bicycle Company, an American Institution (1996) (Henry Holt, New York) Google Scholar
• Daniel Kent, Hirshleifer David, Subrahmanyam Avandihar. Investor psychology and security market under- and overreactions. J. Finance (1988) 53:1839–1885Crossref, Google Scholar
• Davis Douglas D., Holt Charles A.Experimental Economics (1993) (Princeton Unversity Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
• Dixit Avinash K., Nalebuff Barry J.Thinking Strategically: The Competitive Edge in Business, Politics, and Everyday Life (1991) (W.W. Norton & Company, New York) Google Scholar
• Edwards Ward, Kleinmuntz Benjamin. Conservatism in human information processing. Formal Representation of Human Judgment (1968) (Wiley, New York) 17–52Google Scholar
• Erev Ido, Wallsten Thomas S., Budescu David V. Simultaneous over- and underconfidence: The role of error in judgment processes. Psych. Rev. (1994) 101:519–527Crossref, Google Scholar
• Estes William K. Global and local control of choice behavior by cyclically varying outcome probabilities. J. Experiment. Psych. Learn. Memory, Cognition (1984) 10:258–270Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischer Gregory W., Hawkins Scott A. Strategy compatibility, scale compatibility, and the prominence effect. J. Experiment. Psych. Human Perception Performance (1993) 46:835–847Google Scholar
• Fischhoff Baruch, Beyth-Marom Ruth. Hypothesis evaluation from a Bayesian perspective. Psych. Rev. (1983) 90:239–260Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grether David M. Bayes rule as a descriptive model: The representativeness heuristic. Quart. J. Econom. (1980) 95:537–557Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grether David M., Plott Charles R. Economic theory of choice and the preference reversal phenomenon. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1979) 69:623–638Google Scholar
• Griffin Dale, Tversky Amos. The weighing of evidence and the determinants of confidence. Cognitive Psych. (1992) 24:411–435Crossref, Google Scholar
• Grove Andrew S.Only the Paranoid Survive: How to Exploit the Crisis Points that Challenge Every Company (1999) (Doubleday, New York) Google Scholar
• Hamel Gary. Leading the Revolution (2000) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Hey John D. Experimental investigations of errors in decison-making under risk. Eur. Econom. Rev. (1995) 39:633–640Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hey John D., Orme Chris. Investigating generalizations of expected utility theory using experimental data. Econometrica (1994) 62:1291–1326Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones Edward E., Harris Victor A. The attribution of attitudes. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. (1967) 3:1–24Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kahneman Daniel, Tversky Amos. Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psych. (1973) 3:430–454Crossref, Google Scholar
• Koehler Derek J., Brenner Lyle, Griffin Dale, Gilovich Thomas, Griffin Dale, Kahneman Daniel. The calibration of expert judgment: Heuristics and biases beyond the laboratory. Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Human Judgment (2002) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England) 686–715Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kunda Ziva. The case for motivated reasoning. Psych. Bull. (1990) 108:636–647Crossref, Google Scholar
• McFadden Daniel, Manski Charles F., McFadden Daniel. Econometric models of probabilistic choice. Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications (1981) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) 198–272Google Scholar
• Nelson Mark W., Bloomfield Robert, Hales Jeffrey W., Libby Robert. The effect of information strength and weight on behavior in financial markets. Organ. Behavior Human Decision Processes (2001) 86:168–196Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rapoport Amnon, Stein William E., Burkheimer Graham J.Response Models for Detection of Change (1979) (D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robinson Gordon H. Continuous estimation of a time-varying probability. Ergonomics (1964) 7:7–21Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schoemaker Paul J. H. Scenario planning: A tool for strategic thinking. Sloan Management Rev. (1995) 36(Winter):25–40Google Scholar
• Slovic Paul, Lichtenstein Sarah. The relative importance of probabilities and payoffs in risk taking. J. Experiment. Psych. (1968) 78:1–18Crossref, Google Scholar
• Slovic Paul, Griffin Dale, Tversky Amos, Hogarth Robin. Compatibility effects in judgment and choice. Insights in Decision Making: A Tribute to Hillel J. Einhorn (1990) (Chicago University Press, Chicago, IL) 5–27Google Scholar
• Staw Barry M. The escalation of commitment to a course of action. Acad. Management J. (1981) 6:577–587Google Scholar
• Thaler Richard H. Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. J. Econom. Behavior (1980) 1:39–60Crossref, Google Scholar
• Theios John, Brelsford John W., Ryan Phyllis. Detection of change in nonstationary binary sequences. Perception Psychophysics (1971) 9:489–492Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky Amos, Kahneman Daniel. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science (1974) 184:1124–1131Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tversky Amos, Slovic Paul, Kahneman Daniel. The causes of preference reversals. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1990) 80:204–217Google Scholar
• Wu George, Gonzalez Richard. Curvature of the probability weighting function. Management Sci. (1996) 42:1676–1690Link, Google Scholar