Conspicuous Consumption and Sophisticated Thinking

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0399

References

  • Amaldoss W., Jain S. David vs. Goliath: An analysis of asymmetric mixed strategy games and experimental evidence. Management Sci. (2002) 48(8):972–991LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Amaldoss W., Jain S. Pricing of conspicuous goods: A competitive analysis of social effects. J. Marketing Res. (2005) 42(1):30–42CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bagwell L., Bernheim D. Veblen effects in a theory of conspicuous consumption. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1996) 86:349–373Google Scholar
  • Becker G. A note on restaurant pricing and other examples of social influences on price. J. Political Econom. (1991) 99(5):1109–1116CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Belk R. Possessions and the extended self. J. Consumer Res. (1988) 15(2):139–168CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bernheim D. B. A theory of conformity. J. Political Econom. (1994) 102(5):841–877CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Betts P. National hero bearing the burden of success. Financial Times (April 11) (2002) 13Google Scholar
  • Brewer M. The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (1991) 17:475–482CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Camerer C. F., Ho T.-H. Experience-weighted attraction learning in games. Econometrica (1999) 87(July):827–874CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Camerer C. F., Ho T.-H., Chong J.-K. Sophisticated EWA learning and strategic teaching in repeated games. J. Econom. Theory (2002) 104:137–188CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Camerer C. F., Ho T.-H., Chong J.-K. A cognitive hierarchy theory of one-shot games: Some preliminary results. Quart. J. Econom. (2004) 119(3):861–898CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chao A., Schor J. Empirical tests of status consumption: Evidence from women’s cosmetics. J. Econom. Psych. (1998) 19:107–131CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Corneo G., Jeanne O. Conspicuous consumption, snobbism and conformism. J. Public Econom. (1997a) 66:55–71CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Corneo G., Jeanne O. Snobs, bandwagons and the origin of social customs in consumer behavior. J. Econom. Behavior Organ. (1997b) 32:333–347CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Farrell J., Saloner G. Standardization, compatibility and innovation. RAND J. Econom. (1985) 16(Spring):70–83CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fromkin H., Snyder C., Gergen K., Greenberg M., Willis R. The search for uniqueness and the valuation of scarcity. Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research (1980) (Plenum, New York) 57–75CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garner C. Experimental evidence on the rationality of intuitive forecasters. Res. Experiment. Econom. (1982) 2:113–128Google Scholar
  • Holt C., Kagel J., Roth A. Industrial organization: A survey of experimental literature. The Handbook of Experimental Economics (1995) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) 349–443Google Scholar
  • Jones S.Economics of Conformism (1984) (Blackwell, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
  • Katz M., Shapiro C. Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1985) 75(3):424–440Google Scholar
  • Katz M., Shapiro C. Systems competition and network effects. J. Econom. Perspectives (1994) 8(2):93–115CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leibenstein H. Bandwagon, snob, and veblen effects in the theory of consumer demand. Quart. J. Econom. (1950) 64:183–207CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lynn M. Scarcity effect on value: A quantitative review of the commodity theory literature. Psych. Marketing (1991) 8:43–57CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Discounters thwart luxury scent marketMarketing (2000) 43(August 24):26–28Google Scholar
  • Not taking luxury for grantedMarketing Week (1997) July 3Google Scholar
  • Milnor J.Topology from the Differentiable Viewpoint (1965) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Nagel T., Holden R.The Strategy and Tactics of Pricing (2002) (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Nyarko Y., Shotter A. An experimental study of belief learning using elicited beliefs. Econometrica (2002) 70:971–1005CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rapoport A., Amaldoss W. Mixed strategies and iterative elimination of strongly dominated strategies: An experimental investigation of states of knowledge. J. Econom. Behavior Organ. (2000) 42:483–521CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rapoport A., Seale D., Erev I., Sundali J. Equilibrium play in large group market entry games. Management Sci. (1998) 44:119–141LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ross L., Bierbrauer G., Hoffman S. The role of attribution processes in conformity and dissent: Revisiting the Asch situation. Amer. Psychologist (1975) 31:148–157CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roth A., Erev I. Learning in extensive-form games: Experimental data and simple dynamic models in the intermediate term. Games Econom. Behavior (1995) 8:164–212CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roth A., Erev I. Predicting how people play games: Reinforcement learning in experimental games with unique, mixed strategy equilibria. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1998) 88:848–881Google Scholar
  • Schmalensee R. An experimental study of expectation formation. Econometrica (1976) 44:17–41CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simonson I., Nowlis S. The role of explanations and need for uniqueness in consumer decision making. J. Consumer Res. (2000) 27:49–68CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith V. Markets as economizers of information: Experimental investigation of Hayek’s hypothesis. Econom. Inquiry (1982) 20:165–179CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith V., Suchanek G., Williams A. Bubbles, crashes and endogenous expectations in experimental spot asset markets. Econometrica (1988) 56:1119–1151CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Snyder C. Product scarcity by need for uniqueness interaction: A consumer catch-22 carousel? Basic Appl. Soc. Psych. (1992) 13:9–24CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stahl D. Boundedly rational rule learning in a guessing game. Games Econom. Behavior (1996) 12:218–254Google Scholar
  • Stahl D., Wilson P. On players’ models of other players: Theory and experimental evidence. Games Econom. Behavior (1995) 10:213–254CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sun W., Lull J. The adolescent audience for music videos and why they watch. J. Comm. (1986) 36(1):115–125CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sunder S., Kagel J., Roth A. Experimental assets markets: A survey. The Handbook of Experimental Economics (1995) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) 445–500Google Scholar
  • Veblen T.The Theory of Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions (1899) (Unwin Books, London, UK) Google Scholar
  • Williams A. The formation of price forecasts in experimental markets. J. Money, Credit Banking (1987) 19:1–18CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Worchel S., Lee J., Adewole A. Effects of supply and demand on ratings of object value. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. (1975) 32:906–914Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.