Reverse Channel Design: The Case of Competing Retailers

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0454

References

  • Bernstein F., Federgruen A. Decentralized supply chains with competing retailers under demand uncertainty. Management Sci. (2005) 51:18–29LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bernstein F., Chen F., Federgruen A. VMI and supply chain coordination: The case of one supplier and competing retailers. (2002) . Working paper series, Fuqua School of Management, Duke University, Durham, NCGoogle Scholar
  • Chen F., Federgruen A., Zheng Y. Coordination mechanisms for a distribution system with one supplier and multiple retailers. Management Sci. (2001) 47:693–708LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Corbett C., De Groote X. A supplier’s optimal quantity discount policy under asymmetric information. Management Sci. (2000) 46LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Coughlan A. T., Eliashberg J., Lilien G.Sales Force Compensation: A Review of MS/OR Advances. Handbooks in O.R. and M.S. (1993) Volume 5(North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) Google Scholar
  • Debo L., Toktay L. B., Van Wassenhove L. Market segmentation and production technology selection for remanufacturable products. INSEAD WP/47/CIMSO (2002) Google Scholar
  • Dekker R., Fleishmann M., Inderfurth K., Van Wassenhove L.Reverse Logistics: Quantitative Models for Closed-Loop Supply Chains (2004) (Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Donohue K. Efficient supply contracts for fashion goods with forecast updating and two production models. Management Sci. (2000) 46(11):1397–1411LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Emmons H., Gilbert S. The role of return policies in pricing and inventory decisions for catalogue goods. Management Sci. (1998) 44:276–283LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fine C., Porteus E. Dynamic process improvement. Oper. Res. (1989) 4:580–591LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fiona E. S. M. Xerox: Design for the environment. (1993) . Harvard Business School Case 794-022, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Fleischmann M., Buellens P., Boemhof-Ruwaard J., Van Wassenhove L. The impact of product recovery on logistics network design. Production Oper. Management (2001) 10:156–173CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gupta S., LouLou R. Process innovation, product differentiation, and channel structure: Strategic incentives in a duopoly. Marketing Sci. (1998) 17:301–316LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ingene C., Parry M. Channel coordination when retailers compete. Marketing Sci. (1995) 14:360–377LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lee E., Staelin R. Vertical strategic interaction: Implications for channel pricing. Marketing Sci. (1997) 16:185–207LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Li L. Information sharing in a supply chain with horizontal competition. Management Sci. (2002) 48:1196–1212LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lilien G. L., Kotler P., Moorthy K. S.Marketing Models (1992) (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Majumder P., Groenevelt H. Competition in remanufacturing. Production Oper. Management (2001) 10(2):125–141CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McGuire T., Staelin R. An industry equilibrium analysis of downstream vertical integration. Marketing Sci. (1983) 2:161–192LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Petruzzi N. C., Dada M. Pricing and the newsvendor problem: A review with extensions. Oper. Res. (1999) 47:183–193LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Savaskan R. C., Bhattacharya S., Van Wassenhove L. Closed-loop supply chain models with product remanufacturing. Management Sci. (2004) 50:239–253LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Thierry M. An analysis of the impact of product recovery management on manufacturing companies. (1995) . Ph.D. thesis, Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.