A General, Analytic Method for Generating Robust Strategies and Narrative Scenarios

References

• Azar C., Holmberg J., Karlsson S.Decoupling—Past Trends and Prospects for the Future (2002) (Report, Environmental Advisory Council, Ministry of the Environment, Stockholm, Sweden) Google Scholar
• Bankes S. C. Exploratory modeling for policy analysis. Oper. Res. (1993) 41(3):435–449Link, Google Scholar
• Bankes S. C. Tools and techniques for developing policies for complex and uncertain systems. Proc. National Acad. Sci. (2002) 99(13):7263–7266Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bankes S. C., Popper S. W., Lempert R. J.Incorporating Adversarial Reasoning in COAA Planning (2000) (Evolving Logic, Topanga, CA) Google Scholar
• Ben Haim Y.Information-Gap Decision Theory: Decisions Under Severe Uncertainty (2001) (Academic Press, London, UK) Google Scholar
• Berger J. O.Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis (1985) (Springer-Verlag, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brooks A., Bankes S., Bennett B. An application of exploratory analysis: The weapon mix problem. Military Oper. Res. (1999) 4(1):67–80Crossref, Google Scholar
• de Cooman G., Fine T. L., Seidenfeld T.Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Imprecise Probabilities and Their Applications (2001) (Shaker Publishing, Maastricht, The Netherlands) Google Scholar
• Dewar J. A.Assumption Based Planning: A Tool for Reducing Avoidable Surprises (2001) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
• Ellsberg D.Risk, Ambiguity, and Decision (2001) (Garland Publishing, New York) Google Scholar
• Friedman J. H., Fisher N. I. Bump hunting in high-dimensional data. Statist. Comput. (1999) 9(2):123–143Crossref, Google Scholar
• Groller E., Wegenkittl R., Milik A., Prskawetz A., Feichtinger G., Sanderson W. C. The geometry of wonderland. Chaos, Solutions, Fractals (1996) 7(12):1989–2006Crossref, Google Scholar
• Knight F. H.Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit (1921) (Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kouvelis P., Yu G.Robust Discrete Optimization and Its Applications (1997) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lempert R. J., Popper S. W., Bankes S. C. Confronting surprise. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. (2002) 20(4):420–440Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lempert R. J., Popper S. W., Bankes S. C.Shaping the next one hundred years: New methods for quantitative, long-term policy analysis (2003) (MR-1626, RAND, Santa Monica, CA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lempert R. J., Schlesinger M. E., Bankes S. C. When we don’t know the costs or the benefits: Adaptive strategies for abating climate change. Climatic Change (1996) 33:235–274Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lempert R. J., Nakicenovic N., Sarewitz D., Schlesinger M. Characterizing climate-change uncertainties for decisionmakers. Climatic Change (2004) 65:1–9Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lempert R. J., Schlesinger M. E., Bankes S. C., Andronova N. G. The impact of variability on near-term climate-change policy choices. Climatic Change (2000) 45(1):129–161Crossref, Google Scholar
• McKibbin W. J., Wilcoxen P. J.Climate Change Policy After Kyoto (2002) (Brookings Institution Press, Washington, D.C) Google Scholar
• Metz B., Davidson O., Swart R., Pan J. Climate change 2001: Mitigation. (2001) . Contribution of Working Group III to the Third Assessment [TAR] Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
• Morgan M. G., Henrion M.Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis (1990) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morgan M. G., Kandlikar M., Risebey J., Dowlatabadi H. Why conventional tools for policy analysis are often inadequate for problems of global change. Climatic Change (1999) 41:271–281Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nakicenovic N., Alcamo J., Davis G., de Vries B., Fenhann J., Gaffin S., Gregory K., Grübler A. Special report on emissions scenarios. (2000) . Working Group III, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
• Robalino D. A., Lempert R. J. Carrots and sticks for new technology: Crafting greenhouse gas reductions policies for a heterogeneous and uncertain world. Integrated Assessment (2000) 1:1–19Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosenhead M. J., Elton M., Gupta S. K. Robustness and optimality as criteria for strategic decisions. Oper. Res. Quart. (1972) 23(4):413–430Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saltelli A., Chan K., Scott E. M.Sensitivity Analysis (2000) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Sarewitz D., Pielke R. A., Byerly R.Prediction: Science, Decision Making, and the Future of Nature (2000) (Island Press, Washington, D.C.) Google Scholar
• Savage L. J.The Foundations of Statistics (1950) (Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Schwartz P.The Art of the Long View (1996) (Double Day, New York) Google Scholar
• Simon H. Theories of decision-making in economic and behavioral science. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1959) 49(3):253–283Google Scholar
• United NationsHuman Development Report (1990) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
• van Asselt M. B. A.Perspectives on Uncertainty and Risk (2000) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands) Crossref, Google Scholar
• van der Heijden K.Scenarios: The Art of Strategic Conversation (1996) (Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK) Google Scholar
• Victor D.The Collapse of the Kyoto Protocol and the Struggle to Slow Global Warming (2001) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
• Watson S. R., Buede D. M.Decision Synthesis (1987) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
• Zhou K., Doyle J., Glover K.Robust and Optimum Control Theory (1996) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar