Risk Management with Benchmarking

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0476

References

  • Admati A. R., Pfleiderer P. Does it all add up? Benchmarks and the compensation of active portfolio managers. J. Bus. (1997) 70(3):323–350CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alexander G., Baptista A. A comparison of VaR and CVaR constraints on portfolio selection with the mean-variance model. Management Sci. (2004) 50:1261–1273LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Artzner P., Delbaen F., Eber J., Heath D. Coherent measures of risk. Math. Finance (1999) 9(3):203–228CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bajeux-Besnainou I., Portrait R., Tergny G. Dynamic asset allocation with benchmarking. (2003) . Working paper, George Washington University, CNAM, and ESSECGoogle Scholar
  • Basak S. A general equilibrium model of portfolio insurance. Rev. Financial Stud. (1995) 8(4):1059–1090CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Basak S., Shapiro A. Value-at-risk-based risk management: Optimal policies and asset prices. Rev. Financial Stud. (2001) 14(2):371–405CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Basak S., Pavlova A., Shapiro A. Offsetting the incentives: Risk shifting, and benefits of benchmarking in money management. (2005) . CEPR discussion paper 5006, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  • Black F., Scholes M. The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. J. Political Econom. (1973) 81(3):637–654CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brennan M. J. Agency and asset pricing. (1993) . Working paper, University of California, Los Angeles, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Browne S. Beating a moving target: Optimal portfolio strategies for outperforming a stochastic benchmark. Finance Stochastics (1999) 3:275–294CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chan L. K. C., Karceski J., Lakonishok J. On portfolio optimization: Forecasting covariances and choosing the risk model. Rev. Financial Stud. (1999) 12(5):937–974CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chow G. Portfolio selection based on return, risk, and relative performance. Financial Analysts J. (1995) 52(March–April):54–60CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cox J. C., Huang C. Optimal consumption and portfolio policies when asset prices follow a diffusion process. J. Econom. Theory (1989) 49:33–83CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cvitanić J., Karatzas I. Convex duality in constrained portfolio optimization. Ann. Appl. Probab. (1992) 2(4):767–818CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Detemple J. B., Murthy S. Equilibrium asset prices and no arbitrage with portfolio constraints. Rev. Financial Stud. (1997) 10(4):1133–1174CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Economist, The The benchmarking bone. (2001) September):60–61Google Scholar
  • Fama E. F., French K. R. The equity premium. J. Finance (2002) 57(2):637–659CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Foster F. D., Stutzer M. Performance and risk aversion of funds with benchmarks: A large deviations approach. (2002) . Working paper, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IAGoogle Scholar
  • Fung W., Hsieh D. A. Empirical characteristics of dynamic trading strategies: The case of hedge funds. Rev. Financial Stud. (1997) 10:275–302CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fung W., Hsieh D. A. The risk in hedge fund strategies: Theory and evidence from trend followers. Rev. Financial Stud. (2001) 14(2):313–341CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Glauber R. Relative values. Risk (1998) January):39–40Google Scholar
  • Gómez J., Zapatero F. Asset pricing implications of benchmarking: A two-factor CAPM. Eur. J. Finance (2003) 9:343–357CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Góomez J., Priestley R., Zapatero F. An international CAPM with consumption externalities and non-financial wealth. (2004) . Working paper, Norwegian School of Management, and University of Southern CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  • Grossman S. J., Zhou Z. Equilibrium analysis of portfolio insurance. J. Finance (1996) 51(4):1379–1403CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnsen T. H., Donaldson J. B. The structure of intertemporal preferences under uncertainty and time consistent plans. Econometrica (1985) 53(6):1451–1458CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jorion P.Value at Risk: The New Benchmark for Managing Market Risk (2000) 2nd ed.(McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Jorion P. Portfolio optimization with constraints on tracking error. Financial Analysts J. (2003) 59(5):70–82CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Karatzas I., Shreve S. E.Methods of Mathematical Finance (1998) (Springer-Verlag, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Karatzas I., Lehoczky J. P., Shreve S. E. Optimal portfolio and consumption decisions for a “small investor” on a finite horizon. SIAM J. Control Optim. (1987) 25(6):1557–1586CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keynes J. M.The General Theory of Employment, Interest, and Money (1958) (Harcourt Brace, New York) Google Scholar
  • Kosowski R. Do mutual funds perform when it matters most to investors? U.S. mutual fund performance and risk in recessions and booms 1962–2000. (2002) . Working paper, INSEAD, Fontainebleau, FranceGoogle Scholar
  • Kritzman M., Rich D. Risk containment for investors with multivariate utility functions. J. Derivatives (1998) 6:28–44CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lucas R. E. Asset prices in an exchange economy. Econometrica (1978) 46(6):1429–1445CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mehra R., Prescott E. C. The equity premium: A puzzle. J. Monetary Econom. (1985) 15(2):145–161CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Merton R. C. Optimum consumption and portfolio rules in a continuous-time model. J. Econom. Theory (1971) 3:373–413CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moskowitz T. J. Discussion: Mutual fund performance: An empirical decomposition into stock-picking talent, style, transaction costs, and expenses. J. Finance (2000) 55(4):1695–1703CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pastor L., Stambaugh R. F. The equity premium and structural breaks. J. Finance (2001) 56:1207–1239CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rees S. VaR for fund managers. RISK (2000) June):67–70Google Scholar
  • Roll R. A mean-variance analysis of tracking error. J. Portfolio Management (1992) 18(4):13–22CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teplá L. Optimal investment with minimum performance constraints. J. Econom. Dynam. Control (2001) 25:1629–1645CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Watson G., Mina J. The value of relative VaR. RISK (2000) December):520–525Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.