Downside Loss Aversion and Portfolio Management

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0486

References

  • Artzner P., Delbaen F., Eber J., Heath D. Coherent measures of risk. Math. Finance (1999) 9(3):203–228CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Basak S., Shapiro A. Value-at-risk-based risk management: Optimal policies and asset prices. Rev. Financial Stud. (2001) 14(2):371–405CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bawa V. S. Optimal rules for ordering uncertain prospects. J. Financial Econom. (1975) 2:95–121CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bawa V. S. Safety first, stochastic dominance and optimal portfolio selection. J. Financial Quant. Anal. (1978) 13:255–271CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bawa V. S., Lindenberg E. B. Capital market equilibrium in a mean-lower partial moment framework. J. Financial Econom. (1977) 5:189–200CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bielecki T., Rutkowski M.Credit Risk: Modeling, Valuation and Hedging (2001) (Springer Verlag, New York) Google Scholar
  • Carty L. V., Lieberman D. Historical default rates of corporate bond issuers, 1920–1996. (1997) . Moody’s Investors Service, Global Credit Research http://www.moodyskymv.com/research/whitepaper/21727.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Christoffersen P. F., Diebold F. X. Optimal prediction under asymmetric loss. Econometric Theory (1997) 13:808–817CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cuoco D., He H., Issaenko S. Optimal dynamic trading strategies with risk limits. (2001) . Working paper, SSRN http://www.ssrn.comGoogle Scholar
  • Fishburn P. C. Mean-risk analysis with risk associated with below-target returns. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1977) 67(2):116–126Google Scholar
  • Frey R., McNeil A. J. VaR and expected shortfall in portfolios of dependent credit risks: Conceptual and practical insights. J. Banking Finance (2002) 26:1317–1334CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fu M. Optimization for simulation: Theory vs. practice. INFORMS J. Comput. (2002) 14(3):192–215LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Granger C. W. J. Prediction with a generalized cost of error function. Oper. Res. Quart. (1969) 20:199–207CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grootveld H., Hallerbach W. Variance vs. downside risk: Is there really that much difference? Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1999) 114:304–319CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harlow W. V., Rao R. K. S. Asset pricing in a generalized mean-lower partial moment framework. J. Financial Quant. Anal. (1989) 3:285–311CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jarrow R. Put option premiums and coherent risk measures. Math. Finance (2002) 12(2):135–142CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahneman D., Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica (1979) XLVII:263–291CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Krokhmal P., Palmquist J., Uryasev S. Portfolio optimization with conditional value-at-risk objective and constraints. J. Risk (2002) 4(2):43–68CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leland H. Beyond mean-variance: Performance measurement in a nonsymmetrical world. Financial Anal. J. (1999) 54(January/February):27–36CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liu J., Longstaff F., Pan J. Dynamic asset allocation with event risk? J. Finance (2003) 58(1):231–259CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meyer J. Two-moment decision models and expected utility maximization. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1987) 77(3):421–430Google Scholar
  • Pedersen C. S. Derivatives and downside risk. Derivatives Use, Trading Regulation (2001) 7(3):251–268Google Scholar
  • Rockafellar R. T., Uryasev S. Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions. J. Banking Finance (2002) 26(7):1443–1471CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steinbach M. C. Markowitz revisited: Mean-variance models in financial portfolio analysis. SIAM Rev. (2001) 43:31–85CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tasche D. Expected shortfall and beyond. J. Banking Finance (2002) 26:1519–1533CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tversky A., Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty (1992) 5:297–323CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Varian H. Equity, envy and efficiency. J. Econom. Theory (1974) 9:63–91CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zellner A. Bayesian estimation and prediction using asymmetric loss functions. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1986) 81:446–451CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.