Introduction of New Technologies to Competing Industrial Customers

References

• Bagnoli M., Salant S. W., Swierbinski J. E. Durable-goods monopoly with discrete demand. J. Political Econom. (1989) 91:1459–1478Google Scholar
• Balcer Y., Lippman S. Technological expectations and adoption of improved technology. J. Econom. Theory (1984) 34:292–318Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baldwin C. Y., Clark K. B.Design Rules: Volume I. The Power of Modularity (1999) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Bell D. E., Keeney R. L., Little J. D. C. A market share theorem. J. Marketing Res. (1975) 12(May):136–141Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bulow J. I. Durable-goods monopolists. J. Political Econom. (1982) 90:314–332Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coase R. Durability and monopoly. J. Law Econom. (1972) 15:143–149Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen M. A., Eliashberg J., Ho T. New product development: The performance and time-to-market trade-offs. Management Sci. (1996) 42(2):173–186Link, Google Scholar
• Dhebar A. Durable-goods monopolists, rational consumers, and improving products. Marketing Sci. (1994) 13(1):100–120Link, Google Scholar
• Dhebar A. Speeding high-tech producer, meet the balking consumer. Sloan Management Rev. (1996) 37(2):37–49Google Scholar
• Erat S., Kavadias S. Introduction of new technologies to competing industrial customers. (2004) . Technical report, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GAGoogle Scholar
• Greenhouse effect: DuPont is racing to propel its new technology out of the labsForbes Magazine (2003) February 3Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D., Tirole J. Pre-emption and rent equalization in the adoption of new technology. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1985) 52:383–401Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gaimon C. Dynamic game results on the acquisition of new technology. Oper. Res. (1989) 37(3):410–425Link, Google Scholar
• Gruca T., Sudharshan D. Equilibrium characteristics of multinomial logit market share models. J. Marketing Res. (1991) 28(November):480–482Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guth W., Ritzberger K. On durable goods monopolies and the coase-conjecture. Rev. Econom. Design (1998) 3:215–236Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hendricks K. B., Singhal V. R. Delays in new product introduction and the market value of the firm: The consequences of being late to the market. Management Sci. (1997) 43(4):422–436Link, Google Scholar
• Jensen R. Adoption and diffusion of an innovation of uncertain profitability. J. Econom. Theory (1982) 27(1):182–193Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kornish L. J. On optimal replacement thresholds with technological expectations. J. Econom. Theory (1999) 89(2):261–266Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kornish L. J. Pricing for a durable-goods monopolist under rapid sequential innovation. Management Sci. (2001) 47(11):1552–1561Link, Google Scholar
• Krishnan V., Ramachandran K. Design architecture and introduction timing for rapidly improving industrial products. (2006) . Working paper, Rady School of Management, La Jolla, CAGoogle Scholar
• Mamer J. W., McCardle K. F. Uncertainty, competition, and the adoption of new technology. Management Sci. (1987) 33(2):161–177Link, Google Scholar
• McCardle K. F. Information acquisition and the adoption of new technology. Management Sci. (1985) 31(11):1372–1389Link, Google Scholar
• Miller R. W. Informal Sorona GT presentation and private discussions. (2002) . Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GAGoogle Scholar
• Monahan G. E. The structure of equilibria in market share attraction models. Management Sci. (1987) 33(February):228–243Link, Google Scholar
• Moorthy K. S., Png I. P. L. Market segmentation, cannibalization, and the timing of product introductions. Management Sci. (1992) 38(3):345–359Link, Google Scholar
• Naert P. A., Weverbergh M. On the prediction power of market share attraction models. J. Marketing Res. (1981) 18(May):146–153Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vendors aim for extra revenues from licensingRCR Wireless News (2003) March 10Google Scholar
• Reinganum J. On the diffusion of new technology: A game theoretic approach. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1981a) 48(3):395–405Crossref, Google Scholar
• Reinganum J. Market structure and the diffusion of new technology. Bell J. Econom. (1981b) 12(2):618–624Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilling M. Towards a general modular system theory and its application to inter-firm product modularity. Acad. Management Rev. (2000) 25:312–334Google Scholar
• Topkis D. M. Minimizing a submodular function on a lattice. Oper. Res. (1978) 26(2):305–321Link, Google Scholar
• Tushman M., Murmann P. Dominant designs, technology cycles and organizational outcomes. Res. in Organ. Behav. (1998) 20:231–266Google Scholar
• Varian Hal, Schmalensee R., Willig R. Price discrimination. Handbook of Industrial Organisation (1989) 1(North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) 597–654Crossref, Google Scholar
• DuPont to sell textiles unit to Koch—Deal for $4.4 billion allows chemical maker to focus on faster-growing sectorsWall Street Journal (2003) November 18):A6Google Scholar
• One word of advice: Now it’s corn—Plastics manufactured from the plant grow more appealing amid soaring oil pricesWall Street Journal (2004) October 12):B1Google Scholar