Call-Center Labor Cross-Training: It’s a Small World After All

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0621

References

  • Aksin O. Z., Karaesmen F. Designing flexibility characterizing the value of cross-training practices. (2002) . Working paper, INSEAD, Fontainebleau Cedex, FranceGoogle Scholar
  • Albert R., Barabási A. L. Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev. Modern Phys. (2002) 74:47–97CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dorogovtsev S. N., Mendes J. F. F. Evolution of networks. Adv. Phys. (2002) 51:1079–1187CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Graves S. C., Tomlin B. T. Process flexibility in supply chains. Management Sci. (2003) 49(7):907–919LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Guimera R., Uzzi B., Spiro J., Amaral L. A. N. Team assembly mechanisms determine collaboration network structure and team performance. Science (2005) 308:697–702CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gurumurthi S., Benjaafar S. Modeling and analysis of flexible queueing systems. Naval Res. Logist. (2004) 51:755–782CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hopp W. J., Van Oyen M. P. Agile workforce evaluation: A framework for cross-training and coordination. IIE Trans. (2004) 36(10):919–940CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hopp W. J., Tekin E., Van Oyen M. P. Benefits of skill chaining in production lines with cross-trained workers. Management Sci. (2004) 50(1):83–98LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Iravani S. M. R., Van Oyen M. P., Sims K. T. Structural flexibility: A new perspective on the design of manufacturing and service operations. Management Sci. (2005) 51(2):151–166LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jordan W. J., Graves S. C. Principles on the benefits of manufacturing process flexibility. Management Sci. (1995) 41(4):577–594LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jordan W., Inman R., Blumenfeld D. Chained cross-training of workers for robust performance. IIE Trans. (2004) 36(10):953–967CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mandelbaum A., Reiman M. I. On pooling in queueing networks. Management Sci. (1998) 44(7):971–981LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McClain J. O., Schultz K. L., Thomas L. J. Management of worksharing systems. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2000) 2(1):49–67LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Newman M. E. J. Small worlds: The structure of social networks. (2000) . Working paper, Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM, http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/514903.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Sennott L., Van Oyen M. P., Iravani S. M. R. Optimal dynamic assignment of a flexible worker on an open production line with specialists. Eur. J. Res. (EJOR) (2006) 170(2):541–566CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sheikhzadeh M., Benjaafar S., Gupta D. Machine sharing in manufacturing systems: Flexibility versus chaining. Internat. J. Flexible Manufacturing Systems (1998) 10(4):351–378CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tekin E., Hopp W. J., Van Oyen M. P. Pooling strategies for call center agent cross-training. (2004) . Working paper, Industrial Engineering and Management Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, ILGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B., Spiro J. Collaboration and creativity: Big differences from small world networks. Amer. J. Sociol. (2005) 111:447–504CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Watts D. J.Small Worlds: The Dynamics of Networks Between Order and Randomness (1999) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Watts D. J., Strogatz S. H. Collective dynamics of “small-world” networks. Nature (1998) 393:440–442CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wasserman S., Faust K.Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (1994) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.