Membership Herding and Network Stability in the Open Source Community: The Ising Perspective

References

• Ahuja M., Carley K. Network structure in virtual organizations. Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(6):741–757Link, Google Scholar
• Aleksiejuk A., Holyst J. A., Stauffer D. Ferromagnetic phase transition in Barabasi-Albert networks. Physica A (2002) 310:260–266Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banerjee A. A simple model of herd behavior. Quart. J. Econom. (1992) 107(3):797–818Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barabasi L., Albert R. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science (1999) 286(5439):509–512Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bikhchandani S., Hirshleifer D., Welch I. Learning from the behavior of others: Conformity, fads, and informational cascades. J. Econom. Perspect. (1998) 2(3):151–170Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borgatti S. P., Everett M. G., Freeman L. C.Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis (2002) (Analytic Technologies, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Brown J., Duguid P.The Social Life of Information (2002) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Burt R. The contingent value of social capital. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1992) 42(2):339–365Crossref, Google Scholar
• Butler B. Membership size, communication activity, and sustainability: A resource-based model of online social structures. Inform. Systems Res. (2001) 12(4):346–362Link, Google Scholar
• Carley K. A theory of group stability. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1991) 56(3):331–354Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coleman J. Social capital in the creation of human capital. Amer. J. Sociol. (1988) 94(Suppl.):S95–S121Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dalle J.-M., Jullien N. “Libre” software: Turning fads into institutions? Res. Policy (2003) 32(1):1–11Crossref, Google Scholar
• Devenow A., Welch I. Rational herding in financial economics. Eur. Econom. Rev. (1996) 40(3–5):603–615Crossref, Google Scholar
• DiMaggio Paul J., Powell Walter W. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collectivity rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1983) 48(2):147–160Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duncan R. B. Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1972) 17(4):313–327Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erdős P., Rényi A. On the evolution of random graphs. Publ. Math. Inst. Hungarian Acad. Sci. (1960) 5:17–61Google Scholar
• Goldman D., Papadimitriou C., Istrail S. Algorithmic aspects of protein structure similarity. Proc. 40th Annual Sympos. Foundations Comput. Sci. (1999) New York:515–521Crossref, Google Scholar
• Graham J. Herding among investment newsletters: Theory and evidence. J. Finance (1999) 54(1):237–268Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guimera R., Sales-Pardo M., Amaral L. A. N. Modularity from fluctuations in random graphs and complex networks. Physical Rev. E (2004) 70:025101(R)Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gunn B., Brenner M., Mjosund A. The dynamic synthesis theory of motivation. Management Sci. (1968) 14(10):B601–B625Link, Google Scholar
• Healy K., Schussman A. The ecology of open-source development. (2003) . Working paper, MIT, Cambridge, MA, http://opensource.mit.edu/papers/healyschussman.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Hertel G., Niedner S., Herrmann S. Motivation of software developers in open source projects: An Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel. Res. Policy (2003) 32(7):1159–1177Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holyst J. A., Kacperski K. Social impact models of opinion dynamics. Annual Rev. Comput. Phys. (2001) 9:253–273Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ising E. Beitrag zur theorie des ferromagnetismus. Zeitschrift für Physik (1925) 31:253–258Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones Q., Ravid G., Rafaeli S. Information overload and the message dynamics of online interaction space: A theoretical model and empirical exploration. Inform. Systems Res. (2004) 15(2):194–210Link, Google Scholar
• Kacperski K., Holyst J. A. Phase transitions and hysteresis in a cellular automata-based model of opinion formation. J. Statist. Phys. (1996) 84:169–189Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lakhani K., Wolf B. Why hackers do what they do: Understanding motivation and effort in free/open source software projects. (2003) . Working paper, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA. http://freesoftware.mit.edu/papers/lakhaniwolf.pdfGoogle Scholar
• Lawrence P. R., Lorsch J. W.Organization and Environment (1967) (Harvard University Press, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
• Leone M., Vazquez A., Vespignani A., Zecchina R. Ferromagnetic ordering in graphs with arbitrary degree distribution. Eur. Physical J. B (2002) 28(2):191–197Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerner J., Tirole J. Some simple economics of the open source. J. Indust. Econom. (2002) 2(L):197–234Google Scholar
• Malarz K. Social phase transition in Solomon network. Internat. J. Modern Phys. C (2003) 14:561–565Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markus L., Fulk J., Steinfield C. Toward a “critical mass” theory of interactive media. Organizations and Communication Technology (1990) (Sage, Newbury Park, CA) 194–218Crossref, Google Scholar
• Markus L., Manville B., Agres C. What makes a virtual organization work? Sloan Management Rev. (2000) 42(1):13–26Google Scholar
• McClelland D. C. How motives, skills, and values determine what people do. Amer. Psych. (1985) 40(7):812–825Crossref, Google Scholar
• Michlmayr M. Managing volunteer activity in free software projects. Proc. 2004 USENIX Annual Tech. Conf., Freenix Track (2004) Boston, MA:93–102Google Scholar
• Milliken F. Three types of perceived uncertainties about the environment: State, effect and response uncertainty. Acad. Management Rev. (1987) 12(1):133–143Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Mahony S. Guarding the commons: How community managed software projects protect their work. Res. Policy (2003) 32(7):1179–1198Crossref, Google Scholar
• O’Mahony S., Ferraro F. Managing the boundary of an “open” project. (2004) . Harvard NOM Working Paper 03-60, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA, http://ssrn.com/abstract=474782Crossref, Google Scholar
• Onsager L. Crystal physics, I. A two-dimensional model with an order-disorder transition. Physical Rev. (1944) 65:117–149Crossref, Google Scholar
• Powell W. W., White D. R., Koput K. W., Owen-Smith J. Network dynamics and field evolution: The growth of inter-organizational collaboration in the life sciences. Amer. J. Sociol. (2005) 110(4):1132–1205Crossref, Google Scholar
• Putnam R.Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of the American Community (2000) (Simon & Schuster, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scharfstein D., Stein J. Herd behavior and investment. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1990) 80(3):465–479Google Scholar
• Shleifer A., Summers L. The noise trader approach to finance. J. Econom. Perspect. (1990) 4(2):19–33Crossref, Google Scholar
• Uzzi B. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42(1):35–67Crossref, Google Scholar
• Vaughan-Nichols S. J. Commercializing open-source stirs debate. eWeek (2005) August 4). http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1844060,00.aspGoogle Scholar
• von Hippel E., von Krogh G. Open source software and the private-collective innovation model: Issues for organization science. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(2):209–223Link, Google Scholar
• von Krogh G., Spaeth S., Lakhani K. Community, joining, and specialization in open source software innovation: A case study. Res. Policy (2003) 32(7):1217–1241Crossref, Google Scholar
• Winter D. G.The Power Motive (1973) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar