Interfirm Collaboration Networks: The Impact of Large-Scale Network Structure on Firm Innovation

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0624

References

  • Ahuja G. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45:425–455CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allison P. D., Waterman R. Fixed-effects negative binomial regression models. Soc. Methodology (2002) 32:247–265CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anand B. N., Khanna T. Do firms learn to create value? The case of alliances. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:295–315CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Basberg B. L. Patents and the measurement of technological change: A survey of the literature. Res. Policy (1987) 16:131–141CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baum J. A. C., Calabrese T., Silverman B. S. Don’t go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups’ performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:267–294CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baum J. A. C., Shipilov A. V., Rowley T. J. Where do small worlds come from? Indust. Corporate Change (2003) 12:697–725CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blundell R. R., Griffith R., Van Reenen J. Dynamic count data models of technological innovation. Econom. J. (1995) 105:333–344Google Scholar
  • Borgatti S. P., Everett M. G., Freeman L. C. Ucinet for Windows: Software for social network analysis. (2002) . Harvard, Analytic TechnologiesGoogle Scholar
  • Brown J., Duguid P. Organizational learning and communities of practice: Towards a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:40–57CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. S.Structural Holes (1992) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. S., Casella A., Rauch J. E. Bandwidth and echo: Trust, information, and gossip in social networks. Networks and Markets: Contributions from Economics and Sociology (2001) (Russel Sage Foundation, New York) 30–74Google Scholar
  • Cameron A. C., Trivedi P. K. Econometric models based on count data: Comparisons and applications of some estimators and tests. J. Appl. Econometrics (1986) 1:29–53CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cameron A. C., Trivedi P. K.Regression Analysis of Count Data (1998) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coleman J. S. Social capital in the creation of human capital. Amer. J. Sociol. (1988) 94:S95–S120CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cowan R., Jonard N. The dynamics of collective invention. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2003) 52:513–532CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dee T. S., Grabowski D. C., Morrisey M. A. Graduated driver licensing and teen traffic fatalities. J. Health Econom. (2005) 24:571–589CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deeds D. L., Hill C. W. L. Strategic alliances and the rate of new product development: An empirical study of entrepreneurial firms. J. Bus. Venturing (1996) 11:41–55CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dosi G. Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation. J. Econom. Literature (1988) 26:1120–1171Google Scholar
  • Dyer J. H., Singh H. The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23:660–679CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feldman M. P. The new economics of innovation, spillovers, and agglomeration: A review of empirical studies. Econom. Innovation New Tech. (1999) 8:5–25CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fleming L. Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Sci. (2001) 47:117–132LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fleming L., Juda A., King C. Small worlds and regional innovative advantage. (2004) . Harvard Business School Working Paper Series, 04-008, Harvard University, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Freeman C. Networks of innovators: A synthesis of research issues. Res. Policy (1991) 20:499–514CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Freeman L. A set of measures of centrality: I. Conceptual clarification. Soc. Networks (1979) 1:215–239CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gomes-Casseres B., Hagedoorn J., Jaffe A. Do alliances promote knowledge flows? J. Financial Econom. (2006) 80:5–33CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter M. S. The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. (1973) 78:1360–1380CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter M. S., Nohria N., Eccles R. Problems of explanation in economic sociology. Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action (1992) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA) 25–56Google Scholar
  • Greene W. H.Econometric Analysis (1997) 3rd ed.(Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Griliches Z. Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. J. Econom. Literature (1990) 28:1661–1707Google Scholar
  • Griliches Z. The search for R&D spillovers. Scandinavian J. Econom. (1992) 94(Suppl.):29–47CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gujarati D. N.Basic Econometrics (1995) 3rd ed.(McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Gulati R. Alliances and networks. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19:293–317CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R., Gargiulo M. Where do interorganizational networks come from? (1999) 104:1439–1493Google Scholar
  • Hansen M. T. The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44:82–111CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hansen M. T. Knowledge networks: Explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13:232–250LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hargadon A. B. Firms as knowledge brokers: Lessons in pursuing continuous innovation. California Management Rev. (1998) 40(3):209–227CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hargadon A. B., Fanelli A. Action and possibility: Reconciling dual perspectives of knowledge in organizations. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13:290–302LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hausman J., Hall B., Griliches Z. Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents-R&D relationship. Econometrica (1984) 52:909–938CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hecker D. High technology employment: A broader view. Monthly Labor Rev. (1999) 122(6):18–28Google Scholar
  • Heckman J. J. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica (1979) 47(1):153–161CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Henderson R., Clark K. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35:9–30CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jaccard J., Turrisi R.Interaction Effects in Multiple Regression (2003) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jaffe A. Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firms’ patents, profits and market value. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1986) 76:984–1001Google Scholar
  • Kogut B. The network as knowledge. Generative rules and the emergence of structure. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:405–425CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kogut B., Walker G. The small world of Germany and the durability of national networks. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (2001) 66:317–335CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Laumann E. O., Marsden P. V., Prensky D., Burt R. S., Minor M. J. The boundary specification problem in network analysis. Applied Network Analysis (1983) (Sage, Beverly Hills, CA) 18–34Google Scholar
  • Levin R., Klevorick A., Nelson R., Winter S. Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development. Brookings Papers Econom. Activity, Microeconomics (1987) 3:783–820CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mowery D. C., Oxley J. E., Silverman B. S. Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:77–91CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson R. R., Winter S.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Newman M. E. J., Strogatz S. H., Watts D. J. Random graph models of social networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (2002) 99:2566–2572CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Owen-Smith J., Powell W. W. Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15:5–21LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Phelps C. Technological exploration: A longitudinal study of the role of recombinatory search and social capital in alliance networks. (2003) . Unpublished dissertation, New York University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  • Powell W. W., Smith-Doerr L., Smelser N. J., Swedberg R. Networks and economic life. The Handbook of Economic Sociology (1994) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) 368–402Google Scholar
  • Powell W. W., Koput K. W., Smith-Doerr L. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41:116–145CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robinson D. T., Stuart T. E. Network effects in the governance of strategic alliances. J. Law, Econom., Organ. (2007) 23(1):242–273CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenkopf L., Almeida P. Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Sci. (2003) 49:751–766LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenkopf L., Metiu A., George V. P. From the bottom up? Technical committee activity and alliance formation. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2001) 46:748–772CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sampson R. The cost of misaligned governance in R&D alliances. J. Law, Econom., Organ. (2004) 20:484–526CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schmookler J.Invention and Economic Growth (1966) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shan W., Walker G., Kogut B. Interfirm cooperation and startup innovation in the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15:387–394CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith-Doerr L., Owen-Smith J., Koput K. W., Powell W. W., Leenders R., Gabbay S. Networks and knowledge production: Collaboration and patenting in biotechnology. Corporate Social Capital (1999) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA) 331–350CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Soh P.-H. The role of networking alliances in information acquisition and its implication for new product performance. J. Bus. Venturing (2003) 18:727–744CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stuart T. E. Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates in a high technology industry. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:791–812CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Trajtenberg M. Patents, citations, and innovations: Tracing the links. (1987) . Working Paper 2457, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MACrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Trajtenberg M. A penny for your quotes: Patent citations and the value of innovations. RAND J. Econom. (1990) 21:172–187CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1997) 42:35–67CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B., Spiro J. Collaboration and creativity: The small world problem. Amer. J. Sociol. (2005) 111:447–504CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vonortas N. S. Research joint ventures in the US. Res. Policy (1997) 26:577–595CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wasserman S., Faust K.Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (1994) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Watts D. J. Networks, dynamics, and the small-world phenomenon. Amer. J. Sociol. (1999) 105:493–528CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wellman B., Wellman B., Berkowitz S. D. Structural analysis: From method and metaphor to theory and substance. Social Structures: A Network Approach (1988) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) 19–61Google Scholar
  • Yamaguchi K. The flow of information through social networks: Diagonal-free measures of inefficiency and the structural determinants of inefficiency. Soc. Networks (1994) 16:57–86CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zander U., Kogut B. Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test. Organ. Sci. (1995) 6:76–92LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.