Cooperation in Evolving Social Networks

References

• Albert R., Barabasi A.-L. Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev. Modern Phys. (2002) 74(1):47–97Crossref, Google Scholar
• Albert R., Jeong H., Barabasi A.-L. Attack and error tolerance of complex networks. Nature (2000) 406:378–382Crossref, Google Scholar
• Axelrod R. M.The Evolution of Cooperation (1984) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Bendor J., Mookherjee D. Institutional structure and the logic of ongoing collective action. Amer. Political Sci. Rev. (1987) 81(1):129–154Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bergstrom T. C. Evolution of social behavior: Individual and group selection. J. Econom. Perspect. (2002) 16:67–88Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bergstrom T. C., Stark O. How altruism can prevail in an evolutionary environment. Amer. Econom. Rev. (Papers Proc.) (1993) 83:149–155Google Scholar
• Boorman S. A., Levitt P. R.The Genetics of Altruism (1980) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Bowles S., Gintis H. The evolution of strong reciprocity: Cooperation in heterogeneous populations. Theoret. Population Biol. (2004) 65(1):17–28Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bowles S., Fehr E., Gintis H. Strong reciprocity may evolve with or without group selection. Theoret. Primatology Project Newsletter (2003) 1Google Scholar
• Boyd R., Richerson P. J. The evolution of reciprocity in sizable groups. J. Theoret. Biol. (1988) 132:337–356Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boyd R., Gintis H., Bowles S., Richerson P. J. The evolution of altruistic punishment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (2003) 100(6):3531–3535Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt R. S.Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition (1992) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Callaway D. S., Newman M. E. J., Strogatz S. H., Watts D. J. Network robustness and fragility: Percolation on random graphs. PRL (2000) 85:5468–5471Crossref, Google Scholar
• Coleman J. S. Free riders and zealots: The role of social networks. Sociol. Theory (1988) 6:52–57Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dodds P. S., Watts D. J., Sabel C. F. Information exchange and the robustness of organizational networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (2003) 100(21):12516–12521Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eshel I., Samuelson L. Altruists, egoists, and hooligans in a local interaction model. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1998) 88:157–179Google Scholar
• Fehr E., Fischbacher U. The nature of human altruism. Nature (2003) 425:785–791Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D., Tirole J.Game Theory (1991) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Gintis H., Smith E. A. Costly signaling and cooperation. J. Theoret. Biol. (2001) 213:103–119Crossref, Google Scholar
• Granovetter M. S. The strength of weak ties. Amer. J. Sociol. (1973) 78:1360–1380Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huberman B. A., Glance N. S. Evolutionary games and computer simulations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (1993) 90(16):7716–7718Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jackson M. O., Watts A. On the formation of interaction networks in social coordination games. Games Econom. Behav. (2002) 41:265–291Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim H., Bearman P. S. The structure and dynamics of movement participation. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1997) 62:70–93Crossref, Google Scholar
• Macy M. W., Flache A. Learning dynamics in social dilemmas. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (2002) 99(Suppl. 3):7229–7236Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marwell G., Oliver P. E. Social networks and collective action: A theory of the critical mass. III.. Amer. J. Sociol. (1988) 94:502–534Crossref, Google Scholar
• May R. M., Bohoeffer S., Nowak M. A. Spatial games and evolution of cooperation. Proc. Third European Conf. Adv. Artificial Life (1995) 929:749–759Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newman M. E. J. Spread of epidemic disease on networks. Physical Rev. E (2002) 66article 016128Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nowak M. A., May R. M. Evolutionary games and spatial chaos. Nature (1992) 359:826–829Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oliver P. E. Rewards and punishments as selective incentives for collective action: Theoretical investigations. Amer. J. Sociol. (1980) 85:1356–1375Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oliver P. E., Marwell G. A theory of the critical mass. I. Interdependence, group heterogeneity, and the production of collective action. Amer. J. Sociol. (1985) 91(3):522–556Crossref, Google Scholar
• Oliver P. E., Marwell G. Whatever happened to critical mass theory? A retrospective and assessment. Sociol. Theory (2001) 19(3):292–311Crossref, Google Scholar
• Orbell J. M., Dawes R. M. Social welfare, cooperators’ advantage, and the option of not playing the game. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1993) 58(6):787–800Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ostrom E., Burger J., Field C. B., Norgaard R. B., Policansky D. Revisiting the commons: Local lessons, global challenges. Science (1999) 284:278–282Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rapoport A., Luce R. D., Bush R. R., Galanter E. Mathematical models of social interaction. Handbook of Mathematical Psychology (1963) 2(Wiley, New York) 493–579Google Scholar
• Skyrms B., Permantle R. A dynamic model of social network formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (2000) 97(16):9340–9346Crossref, Google Scholar
• Strogatz S. H. Exploring complex networks. Nature (2001) 410:268–276Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watts D. J. Networks, dynamics, and the small-world phenomenon. Amer. J. Sociol. (1999a) 105:493–527Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watts D. J.Small Worlds: The Dynamics of Networks Between Order and Randomness (1999b) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watts D. J. The “new” science of networks. Annual Rev. Sociol. (2004) 30:243–270Crossref, Google Scholar
• Watts D. J., Strogatz S. H. Collective dynamics of “small-world” networks. Nature (1998) 393:440–442Crossref, Google Scholar