The Performance Consequences of Ambidexterity in Strategic Alliance Formations: Empirical Investigation and Computational Theorizing

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1070.0712

References

  • Abrahamson E., Rosenkopf L. Social network effects on the extent of innovation diffusion: A computer simulation. Organ. Sci. (1997) 8(3):289–309LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ahuja M. K., Galletta D. F., Carley K. M. Individual centrality and performance in virtual R&D groups: An empirical study. Management Sci. (2003) 49:21–38LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Anand B. N., Khanna T. Do firms learn to create value? The case of alliances. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:295–315CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Axelrod R.The Complexity of Cooperation: Agent-Based Models of Competition and Collaboration (1997) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ballesta M., Livnat J., Sinha N. Corporate reorganizations: Changes in the intensity of labor and capital expenditures. J. Bus. Finance Accounting (1999) 26:1205–1238CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baum J. A. C., Calabrese T., Silverman B. S. Don't go it alone: Alliance networks and startup performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management J. (2000b) 21:267–294CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baum J. A. C., Li S. X., Usher J. M. Making the next move: How experiential and vicarious learning shape the locations of chains' acquisitions. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000a) 45:766–801CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Beckman C. M., Haunschild P. R., Phillips D. J. Friends or strangers? Firm-specific uncertainty, market uncertainty, and network partner selection. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15:259–275LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bergh D. D., Lawless M. W. Portfolio restructuring and limits to hierarchical governance: The effects of environmental uncertainty and diversification strategy. Organ. Sci. (1998) 9:87–102LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. S.Structural Holes (1992) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. S., Sutton R. I., Staw B. M. The network structure of social capital. Research in Organizational Behavior (2000) (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. S. Bridge decay. Soc. Networks (2002) 24:330–363CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burton R. M., Obel B. The validity of computational models in organizations science: From model realism to purpose of the model. Computational Math. Organ. Theory (1995) 1:57–71CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burton R. M., DeSanctis G., Obel B.Organizational Design: A Step-by-Step Approach (2006) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Campbell D. T. Degrees of freedom and the case study. Comparative Political Stud. (1975) 8:178–193CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carley K. M., Prietula M. J., Carley K. M., Prietula M. J. ACTS theory: Extending the model of bounded rationality. Computational Organization Theory (1994) (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ) 55–88Google Scholar
  • Coleman J. S. Social capital in the creation of human capital. Amer. J. Sociol. (1988) 4:95–120CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dess G. G., Beard D. W. Dimensions of organizational task environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1984) 29:52–73CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Doz Y. L. The evolution of cooperation in strategic alliances: Initial conditions or learning processes? Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:55–83CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dyer J. H., Nobeoka K. Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: The Toyota case. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:345–367CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dyer J. H., Singh H. The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Acad. Management Rev. (1998) 23:660–679CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M. Building theories from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14:532–550CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M., Zbaracki M. J. Strategic decision making. Strategic Management J. (1992) 13:17–37CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Freeman L. C. Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Soc. Networks (1979) 1:215–239CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ghemawat P., Costa J. E. R. I. The organizational tension between static and dynamic efficiency. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14:59–73CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gibson C. B., Birkinshaw J. The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47:209–226CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. Amer. J. Sociol. (1985) 91:481–510CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grant R., Baden-Fuller C. A knowledge accessing theory of strategic alliances. J. Management Stud. (2004) 41:61–84CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R. Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Acad. Management J. (1995a) 38:85–112CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R. Social structure and alliance formation patterns: A longitudinal analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1995b) 40:619–652CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R. Alliances and networks. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19:293–317CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gulati R., Nohria N., Zaheer A. Strategic network. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21(Special Issue):203–215CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hambrick D. C., McMillan I. C., Day D. L. Strategic attributes and performance in the BCG matrix: A PIMs based analysis of industrial product businesses. Acad. Management J. (1982) 25:510–531CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hand J., Lev B.Intangible Assets: Values, Measurement, and Risk (2003) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Hannan M. T., Freeman E. R. The population ecology of organizations. Amer. J. Sociol. (1977) 82:929–964CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan M. T., Carroll G. R., Polos L. The organizational niche. Sociol. Theory (2003) 21:311–340CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • He Z., Wong P. K. Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15:481–494LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hill C. W. L., Rothaermel F. T. The performance of incumbent firms in the face of radical technological innovation. Acad. Management Rev. (2003) 28:257–274CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hitt M. A., Dacin M. T., Levitas E., Arregle J., Borza A. Partner selection in emerging and developed market contexts: Resource-based and organizational learning perspectives. Acad. Management J. (2000) 43:449–467CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoover S. V., Perry R. F.Simulation: A Problem-Solving Approach (1989) (Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Ibarra H. Network centrality, power, and innovation involvement: Determinants of technical and administrative roles. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36:471–501CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Inkpen A., Hitt M. A., Freeman R. E., Harrison J. S. Strategic alliances. Handbook of Strategic Management (2001) (Blackwell Publishing, New York) 409–432Google Scholar
  • Kleinbaum D. G., Kupper L. L., Muller K. E.Applied Regression Analysis and Other Multivariate Methods (1988) 2nd ed.(PWS-Kent, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Kogut B., Zander U. Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary-theory of the multinational-corporation. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (1993) 24:625–645CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koza M. P., Lewin A. Y. The co-evolution of strategic alliances. Organ. Sci. (1998) 3:255–264LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lant T. K., Milliken F. J., Batra B. The role of managerial learning and interpretation in strategic persistence and reorientation: An empirical exploration. Strategic Management J. (1992) 13:585–608CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lavie D., Rosenkopf L. Balancing exploration and exploitation in alliance formation. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49:797–818CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leonard-Barton D. A. Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic Management J. (1992) 13:111–125CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal D. A., March J. G. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14:95–112CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lin Z. The dynamics of interorganizational ties during crisis: Empirical evidence and computational analysis. Simulation Model. Practices Theory (2002) 10:387–415CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Madhavan R., Koka B. R., Prescott J. E. Network in transition: How industry events (re)shape interfirm relationships. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19:439–459CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:71–87LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Markino S., Inkpen A. C., Easterby-Smith M., Lyles M. A. Knowledge seeking FDI and learning across borders. The Blackwell Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management (2003) (Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA) 233–252Google Scholar
  • Mitton T. A cross-firm analysis of the impact of corporate governance on the East Asian financial crisis. J. Financial Econom. (2002) 64:215–241CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson R., Winter S. G.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • O'Reilly C. A., Tushman M. L. The ambidextrous organization. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2004) 82:74–81Google Scholar
  • Park S. H., Chen R., Gallagher S. Firm resources as moderators of the relationship between market growth and strategic alliances in semiconductor start-ups. Acad. Management J. (2002) 45:527–545CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perry-Smith J. E., Shalley C. E. The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective. Acad. Management Rev. (2003) 28:89–106CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pfeffer J., Salancik G. R.The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (1978) (Harper, New York) Google Scholar
  • Podolny J. M. Market uncertainty and the social character of economic exchange. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1994) 39:458–483CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Porter M. E.Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors (1980) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Powell W. W., Koput K. W., Smith-Doerr L. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1996) 41:116–145CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reagans R., Zuckerman E. W. Networks, diversity, and performance: The social capital of corporate R&D units. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12:502–517LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Repenning N. P. A simulation-based approach to understanding the dynamics of innovation implementation. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13:107–127LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenkopf L., Almeida P. Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Sci. (2003) 49:751–766LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenkopf L., Nerkar A. Beyond local search: Boundary-spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22:287–306CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rothaermel F. T., Deeds D. Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: A system of new product development. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25:201–221CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rowley T., Behrens D., Krackhardt D. Redundant governance structures: An analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:369–386CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon H. A.“Satisficing” in the New Palgrave: A Dictionary of Economics (1987) (Palgrave, London, UK) Google Scholar
  • Soda G., Usai A., Zaheer A. Network memory: The influence of past and current networks on performance. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47:893–906CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sorenson O. Interdependence and adaptability: Organizational learning and the long-term effect of integration. Management Sci. (2003) 49:446–463LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Straw B. M., Sandelands L. E., Dutton J. E. Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1981) 26:501–524CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stuart T. E. Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates in a high-technology industry. Strategic Management J. (2000) 21:791–811CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taber C. S., Timpone R. J.Computational Modeling (1996) (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tan J., Peng M. Organizational slack and firm performance during economic transitions: Two studies from an emerging economy. Strategic Management J. (2003) 24:1249–1263CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tushman M., O'Reilly C. A. The ambidextrous organization: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. Calif. Management Rev. (1996) 38:1–23CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1996) 61:674–698CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Van Looy B., Martens T., Debackere K. Organizing for continuous innovation: On the sustainability of ambidextrous organizations. Creativity Innovation Management (2005) 14:208–221CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Volberda H. W., Lewin A. Co-evolutionary dynamics within and between firms: From evolution to co-evolution. J. Management Stud. (2003) 40:2111–2136CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wasserman S., Faust K.Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (1994) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yin R. K.Case Study Research: Design and Methods (1994) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.