Performance Contracting in After-Sales Service Supply Chains

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1070.0741

References

  • Bolton P., Dewatripont M.Contract Theory (2005) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Cachon G. P., Graves S., de Kok T. Supply chain coordination with contracts. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Supply Chain Management (2003) (Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) . Chap. 6.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chen F. Salesforce incentives, market information, and production/inventory planning. Management Sci. (2005) 51(1):60–75LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen F., Federgruen A. Mean-variance analysis of basic inventory models. (2000) . Working paper, Columbia University, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen M. A., Agrawal V., Agrawal N. Achieving breakthrough service delivery through dynamic asset deployment strategies. Interfaces (2006) 36(3):259–271LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen M. A., Kamesam P., Kleindorfer P., Lee H., Tekerian A. OPTIMIZER: A multi-echelon inventory system for service logistics management. Interfaces (1990) 20(1):65–82LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Corbett C. J. Stochastic inventory systems in a supply chain with asymmetric information: Cycle stocks, safety stocks, and consignment stock. Oper. Res. (2001) 49(4):487–500LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cummins J. M. Incentive contracting for national defense: A problem of optimal risk sharing. Bell J. Econom. (1977) 8:168–185CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Defense Acquisition University Defense acquisition guidebook. (2005a) . http://akss.dau.mil/dagGoogle Scholar
  • Defense Acquisition University Performance based logistics: A program manager's product support guide. (2005b) . http://www.dau.mil/pubs/misc/PBL_Guide.aspGoogle Scholar
  • Dennis M. J., Kambil A. Service management: Building profits after the sale. Supply Chain Management Rev. (2003) 7(1):42–48Google Scholar
  • Feeney G. J., Sherbrooke C. C. The (s−1, s) Inventory policy under compound poisson demand. Management Sci. (1966) 12(5):391–411LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Holmström B., Milgrom P. Multitask principal-agent analyses: Incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design. J. Law, Econom., Organ. (1991) 7:24–52CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iyer A. V., Schwarz L. B., Zenios S. A. A principal-agent model for product specification and production. Management Sci. (2005) 51(1):106–119LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kim S.-H., Cohen M. A., Netessine S. Reliability of inventory? Contracting strategies for after-sales product support. (2007) . Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PAGoogle Scholar
  • Laffont J.-J., Tirole J.A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation (1993) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Lutze H. S., Ozer O. Promised lead time contracts under asymmetric information. Oper. Res. (2006) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Macfarlan W. G., Mansir B. Supporting the warfighter through performance-based contracting. Defense Standardization Program J. (2004) July/September):38–43 http://www.dsp.dla.mil/APP_UIL/content/newsletters/journal/DSPJ-07-04.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • McAfee R. P., McMillan J. Bidding for contracts: A principal-agent analysis. RAND J. Econom. (1986) 17(3):326–338CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Muckstadt J. A.Analysis and Algorithms for Service Parts Supply Chains (2005) (Springer, New York) Google Scholar
  • Plambeck E. L., Taylor T. A. Partnership in a dynamic production system with unobservable actions and noncontractible output. Management Sci. (2006) 52(10):1509–1527LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Plambeck E. L., Zenios S. A. Performance-based incentives in a dynamic principal-agent model. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2000) 2(3):240–263LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Scherer F. M. The theory of contractual incentives for cost reduction. Quart. J. Econom. (1964) 78(2):257–280CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sherbrooke C. C. METRIC: A multi-echelon technique for recoverable item control. Oper. Res. (1968) 16(1):122–141LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sherbrooke C. C.Optimal Inventory Modeling of Systems: Multi-Echelon Techniques (1992) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
  • So K. C., Tang C. S. Modeling the impact of an outcome-oriented reimbursement policy on clinic, patients, and pharmaceutical firms. Management Sci. (2000) 46(7):875–892LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Su X., Zenios S. A. Recipient choice can address the efficiency-equity trade-off in kidney transplantation: A mechanism design model. Management Sci. (2006) 52(11):1647–1660LinkGoogle Scholar
  • U.S. Department of Defense Department of Defense Directive 5000.1. (2003) . U.S. Department of Defense, Washington, D.C., http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/500001p.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • U.S. Department of Defense DoD guide for achieving reliability, availability, and maintainability. (2005) . U.S. Department of Defense, Washington, D.C., http://www.dote.osd.mil/reports/RAMGuide.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Van Mieghem J. A. Risk mitigation in newsvendor networks: Resource diversification, flexibility, sharing, and hedging. Management Sci. (2007) 53(8):1269–1288LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wang Y., Cohen M. A., Zheng Y.-S. A two-echelon repairable inventory system with stocking-center-dependent depot replenishment lead times. Management Sci. (2000) 46(11):1441–1453LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.