Research Note—Should Consumers Use the Halo to Form Product Evaluations?

References

• Balzer W. K., Sulsky L. M. Halo and performance appraisal research: A critical examination. J. Appl. Psych. (1992) 77(6):975–985Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bawa V. S., Brown S., Klein R. W.Estimation Risk and Optimal Portfolio Choice (1979) (North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam) Google Scholar
• Beckwith N. E., Lehmann D. R. The importance of halo effects in multi-attribute attitude models. J. Marketing Res. (1975) 12(3):265–275Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burke M. C., Edell J. A. The impact of feelings on ad-based affect and cognition. J. Marketing Res. (1989) 26(1):69–83Crossref, Google Scholar
• Casella G., Berger R. L.Statistical Inference (1990) (Wadsworth, Pacific Grove, CA) Google Scholar
• Cooper W. H. Conceptual similarity as a source of illusory halo in job performance ratings. J. Appl. Psych. (1981) 66:302–307Crossref, Google Scholar
• Efron B., Morris C. Stein's estimation rule and its competitors—An empirical Bayes approach. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1973) 68(341):117–130Google Scholar
• Efron B., Morris C. Data analysis using Stein's estimator and its generalizations. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1975) 70(350):311–319Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feldman J. M. A note on the statistical correction of halo error. J. Appl. Psych. (1986) 71:173–176Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green E. J., Strawderman W. E. A James-Stein type estimator for combining unbiased and possibly biased estimators. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1991) 86(416):1001–1006Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huber J., McCann J. The impact of inferential beliefs on product evaluations. J. Marketing Res. (1982) 19(3):324–333Crossref, Google Scholar
• James W., Stein C. Estimation with quadratic loss. Proc. Fourth Berkeley Sympos. Math. Statist. Probab. (1960) 1(University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) 361–379Google Scholar
• Jorion P. Bayes-Stein estimation for portfolio analysis. J. Financial Quant. Anal. (1986) 21(3):279–292Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kim T.-H., White H. James-Stein-type estimators in large samples with application to the least absolute deviations estimator. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (2001) 96(454):697–705Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kirmani A., Rao A. R. No pain, no gain: A critical review of the literature on signaling unobservable product quality. J. Marketing (2000) 64(2):66–79Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lance C. E., Woehr D. J. Statistical control of halo: Clarification from two cognitive models of the performance appraisal process. J. Appl. Psych. (1986) 71(4):679–685Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lance C. E., LaPointe J. A., Stewart A. M. A test of the context dependency of three causal models of halo rater error. J. Appl. Psych. (1994) 79(3):332–340Crossref, Google Scholar
• Murthi B. P. S., Choi Y. K., Desai P. Efficiency of mutual funds and portfolio performance measurement: A non-parametric approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (1997) 98(2):408–418Crossref, Google Scholar
• Neumann J. V., Morgenstern O.Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (1944) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) Google Scholar
• Robert C. P.The Bayesian Choice (1994) (Springer-Verlag, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts J. H., Urban G. Modeling multiattribute utility, risk, and belief dynamics for new consumer durable brand choice. Management Sci. (1988) 34(2):167–185Link, Google Scholar
• Ross W. T., Creyer E. H. Making inferences about missing information: The effects of existing information. J. Consumer Res. (1992) 19(1):14–25Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rossi P. E., Allenby G. M. A Bayesian approach to estimating household parameters. J. Marketing Res. (1993) 30(2):171–182Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sine W. D., Shane S., DiGregorio D. The halo effect and technology licensing: The influence of institutional prestige on the licensing of university inventions. Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):478Link, Google Scholar
• Stein C. Inadmissibility of the usual estimator for the mean of a multivariate distribution. Proc. Third Berkeley Sympos. Math. Statist. Probab. 1954–1955 (1956) 1(University of California Press, Berkeley, CA) 197–206Google Scholar