The Dual Role of Modularity: Innovation and Imitation

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1070.0775

References

  • Adami C. What is complexity? BioEssays (2002) 24:1085–1094CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aragones E., Gilboa I., Postlewaite A., Schmeidler D. Fact-free learning. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2005) 95(5):1355–1368CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baldwin C. (2005) . Personal communication, Harvard Business School, BostonGoogle Scholar
  • Baldwin C. Y., Clark K. B., Yoffie D. B. Sun wars: Competition within a modular cluster, 1985–1990. Competing in the Age of Digital Convergence (1997) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) 123–157Google Scholar
  • Baldwin C. Y., Clark K. B.Design Rules: The Power of Modularity (2000) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barney J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management (1991) 17(1):99–120CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Computerworld 35 years of IT leadership: The best and the worst. Computerworld (2002) 36(40, September 30):74Google Scholar
  • Conner K. R., Prahalad C. K. A resource-based theory of the firm: Knowledge versus opportunism. Organ. Sci. (1996) 7(5):477–501LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dawes R. M. Robust beauty of improper linear-models in decision-making. Amer. Psychologist (1979) 34(7):571–582CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ethiraj S. K., Levinthal D. A. Bounded rationality and the search for organizational architecture: An evolutionary perspective on the design of organizations and their evolvability. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2004a) 49(3):404–437CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ethiraj S. K., Levinthal D. A. Modularity and innovation in complex systems. Management Sci. (2004b) 50(2):159–173LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Garud R., Kumaraswamy A. Technological and organizational designs for realizing economies of substitution. Strategic Management J. (1995) 16(Special Issue):93–109CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garud R., Nayyar P. R. Transformative capacity: Continual structuring by intertemporal technology transfer. Strategic Management J. (1994) 15:365–386CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldberg D. E.Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning (1989) (Addison-Wesley Longman, Reading, MA) Google Scholar
  • Heath C., Soll J. B. Mental accounting and consumer decisions. J. Consumer Res. (1996) 23:40–52CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heath C., Staudenmayer N. Coordination neglect: How lay theories of organizing complicate coordination in organizations. Res. Organ. Behav. (2000) 22:153–191CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kauffman S. A.The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution (1993) (Oxford University Press, New York) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klein B., Crawford R. G., Alchian A. A. Vertical integration, appropriable rents, and the competitive contracting process. J. Law Econom. (1978) 21(2):297–326CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kogut B., Zander U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(3):383–397LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal D. A. Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. (1997) 43(7):934–950LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lippman S., Rumelt R. Uncertain imitability: An analysis of interfirm differences in efficiency under competition. Bell J. Econom. (1982) 13(2):418–453CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Page S. E. Two measures of difficulty. Econom. Theory (1996) 8(2):321–346CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parnas D. L. On the criteria to be used in decomposing systems into modules. Comm. ACM (1972) 15(12):1053–1058CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Porter M. E.Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors (1980) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Porter M. E. Towards a dynamic theory of strategy. Strategic Management J. (1991) 12(Winter):95–117CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Read D., Loewenstein G., Rabin M. Choice bracketing. J. Risk Uncertainty (1999) 19(1–3):171–197CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reed R., DeFillippi R. J. Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage. Acad. Management Rev. (1990) 15(1):88–102CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rivkin J. Imitation of complex strategies. Management Sci. (2000) 46(6):824–844LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rivkin J. Reproducing knowledge: Replication without imitation at moderate complexity. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(3):274–293LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rivkin J., Therivel L. Delta air lines (A): The low-cost carrier threat. (2004) . HBS Case 9-704-403, Harvard Business School, BostonGoogle Scholar
  • Rumelt R. P., Lamb R. B. Toward a strategic theory of the firm. Competitive Strategic Management (1984) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) 556–570Google Scholar
  • Schaefer S. Product design partitions with complementary components. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1999) 38(3):311–330CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon H. A.Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization (1957) 2nd ed.(Macmillan, New York) Google Scholar
  • Simon H. A. The architecture of complexity. Proc. Amer. Philos. Soc. (1962) 106:467–482Google Scholar
  • Simonin B. L. Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances. Strategic Management J. (1999) 20(7):595–623CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Szulanski G. Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17(Winter):27–43CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thaler R. H. Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Sci. (1985) 4:199–214LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson J. D.Organizations in Action (1967) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Ulrich K. T. The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Res. Policy (1995) 24:419–440CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wah L. Give ERP a chance. Management Rev. (2000) 89(3):20–24Google Scholar
  • Williamson O. E.Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting (1985) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Winter S. G., Teece D. Knowledge and competence as strategic assets. The Competitive Challenge (1987) (Ballinger, Cambridge, MA) 159–184Google Scholar
  • Winter S. G., Montgomery C. A. The four Rs of profitability: Rents, resources, routines, and replication. Resource-Based and Evolutionary Theories of the Firm: Towards a Synthesis (1995) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston) 147–178CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.