High Touch Through High Tech: The Impact of Salesperson Technology Usage on Sales Performance via Mediating Mechanisms

References

• Ahearne M., Srinivasan N., Weinstein L. Effects of technology on sales performance: Progressing from technology acceptance to technology usage and consequences. J. Personal Selling Sales Management (2004) 4:297–310Google Scholar
• Anderson E., Narus J. A model of distributor firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships. J. Marketing (1990) 54(1):42–58Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson J. C., Gerbing D. W. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psych. Bull. (1988) 103:411–423Crossref, Google Scholar
• Atuahene-Gima K. Involving organizational buyers in new product development. Indust. Marketing Management (1995) 24:215–226Crossref, Google Scholar
• Avlontis G. J., Panagopoulos N. G. Antecedents and consequences of CRM technology acceptance in the sales force. Indust. Marketing Management (2005) 34:355–368Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bagozzi R. P., Yi Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (1988) 16:74–94Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron R. M., Kenny D. A. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1986) 51:1173–1182Crossref, Google Scholar
• Behrman D. N., Perreault W. D. A role stress model of the performance and satisfaction of industrial salespersons. J. Marketing (1984) 48:9–21Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bentler P. M. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psych. Bull. (1990) 107:238–246Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bitner M. J. Evaluating service encounters: The effects of physical surroundings and employee responses. J. Marketing (1990) 54:69–82Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bitner M. J., Booms B. H., Mohr L. A. Critical service encounters: The employee's viewpoint. J. Marketing (1994) 58:95–106Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blum J. Drugmakers want U.S. to allow “generic” biotech medicines. Bloomberg News (2007) . republished in Salem News (January 12), http://www.salemnews.com/pubiz/local_story_012121849Google Scholar
• Boorom M. L., Goolsby J. R., Ramsey R. P. Relational communication traits and their effect on adaptiveness and sales performance. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (1998) 26:16–31Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown S., Peterson R. The effect of effort on sales performance and job satisfaction. J. Marketing (1994) 58:70–80Crossref, Google Scholar
• Churchill G. A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. J. Marketing Res. (1979) 16:64–73Crossref, Google Scholar
• Churchill G. A., Ford N., Hartley S., Walker O. The determinants of salesperson performance: A meta-analysis. J. Marketing Res. (1985) 22:103–118Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen M. D., Bacdayan P. Organizational routines are stored as procedural memory: Evidence from laboratory study. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5:554–568Link, Google Scholar
• Collopy F. Biases in retrospective self-reports of time use: An empirical study of computer users. Management Sci. (1996) 42:758–767Link, Google Scholar
• Crosby L. A., Evans K. R., Cowles D. Relationship quality in services selling: An interpersonal influence perspective. J. Marketing (1990) 54:68–81Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dennis A. R., Wixom B. H., Vandenberg R. J. Understanding fit and appropriation effects in group support systems via meta-analysis. MIS Quart. (2001) 25:167–193Crossref, Google Scholar
• Devaraj S., Kohli R. Performance impacts of information technology: Is actual usage the missing link? Management Sci. (2003) 49:273–289Link, Google Scholar
• Duncan T., Moriarty S. E. A communication-based marketing model for managing relationships. J. Marketing (1998) 62:1–13Crossref, Google Scholar
• Erffmeyer R. C., Johnson D. A. An exploratory study of sales force automation practices: Expectations and realities. J. Personal Selling Sales Management (2001) 21Google Scholar
• Fornell C., Larcker D. F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Marketing Res. (1981) 28:39–50Crossref, Google Scholar
• Girard K. Stats not good for sales technology. Computerworld (1998) 32(April 6):29Google Scholar
• Gohmann S. F., Guan B. J., Faulds D. J. Perceptions of sales force automation: Differences between sales force and management. Indust. Marketing Management (2005) 34:337–343Crossref, Google Scholar
• Good D., Stone R. W. Computer technology and the marketing organization. J. Bus. Res. (1995) 34:197–209Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodhue D. L., Thompson R. L. Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quart. (1995) 19:213–228Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goolsby J. R., Lagace R., Boorom M. L. Psychological adaptiveness and sales performance. J. Personal Selling Sales Management (1992) 12:51–66Google Scholar
• Griffith T. L., Northcraft G. B. Distinguishing between the forest and the trees: Media, features, and methodology in electronic communication research. Organ. Sci. (1994) 5(2):272–285Link, Google Scholar
• Haas M., Hansen M. When using knowledge can hurt performance: The value of organizational capabilities in a management consulting company. Strategic Management J. (2005) 26:1–24Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hartline M. D., Ferrell O. C. The management of customer-contact service employees: An empirical investigation. J. Marketing (1996) 60:52–70Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huber G. A theory of effects of advanced information technologies or organizational design, intelligence and decision making. Acad. Management Rev. (1990) 15:47–71Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huber G. Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2:88–115Link, Google Scholar
• Humphreys M. A., Williams M. R. Exploring the relative effects of salesperson interpersonal processes attributes and technical attributes. J. Personal Selling Sales Management (1996) 16:47–57Google Scholar
• Igbaria M., Tan M. The consequences of information technology acceptance on subsequent individual performance. Inform. Management (1997) 32:113–122Crossref, Google Scholar
• James L., Demaree R. G., Wolf G. Estimating within-group reliability with and without response bias. J. Appl. Psych. (1984) 69:85–98Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa D. L., Ives B. The global network organization of the future: Information management opportunities and challenges. J. Management Inform. Systems (1994) 10:25–57Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jones E., Sundaram S., Chin W. Factors leading to sales force automation use: A longitudinal analysis. J. Personal Selling Sales Management (2002) 22:145Google Scholar
• Kim K. The relation among fit indexes, power, and sample size in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Model. (2005) 12(3):368–390Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ko D.-G., Dennis A. R. Sales force automation and sales performance: Do experience and expertise matter? J. Personal Selling Sales Management (2004) 4:311–322Google Scholar
• Kohli A. K. Effects of supervisory behavior: The role of individual differences among salespeople. J. Marketing (1989) 53:40–50Crossref, Google Scholar
• Landis R. S., Beal D. J., Tesluk P. E. A comparison of approaches to forming composite measures in structural equation models. Organ. Res. Methods (2000) 3:186–207Crossref, Google Scholar
• Leigh T. W., Marshall G. W. Research priorities in sales strategy and performance. J. Personal Selling Sales Management (2001) 21:83–91Google Scholar
• Marcolin B. L., Compeau D. R., Munro M. C., Huff S. L. Assessing user competence: Conceptualization and measurement. Inform. Systems Res. (2000) 11(1):37–60Link, Google Scholar
• Marshall G. W., Moncrief W. C., Lassk F. G. The current state of sales force activities. Indust. Marketing Management (1999) 28:87–99Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mathieu J. E., Taylor S. R. Clarifying conditions and decision points for mediational type inferences in organizational behavior. J. Organ. Behav. (2006) 27:1031–1056Crossref, Google Scholar
• Millman Z., Hartwick J. The impact of automated office systems on middle managers and their work. MIS Quart. (1987) 11:478–491Crossref, Google Scholar
• Mohr J., Nevin J. Communication strategies in marketing channels: A theoretical perspective. J. Marketing (1990) 54:36–51Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moncrief W. C. Selling activity and sales position taxonomies for industrial sales forces. J. Marketing Res. (1986) 23:261–270Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moncrief W. C., Lamb C., MacKay J. Laptop computers in industrial sales. Indust. Marketing Management (1991) 20:279–285Crossref, Google Scholar
• Morgan A. J., Inks S. A. Technology and the sales force—Increasing acceptance of sales force automation. Indust. Marketing Management (2001) 30:463–472Crossref, Google Scholar
• Parasuraman A., Zeithaml V. A., Berry L. L. A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. J. Marketing (1985) 49:41–50Crossref, Google Scholar
• Podsakoff P., MacKenzie S., Lee J. Y., Podsakoff N. P. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88:879–903Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pullig C., Maxham J. G., Hair J. Sales force automation systems: An exploratory examination of organizational factors associated with effective implementation and sales force productivity. J. Bus. Res. (2002) 55:401–415Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rivers M. L., Dart J. The acquisition and use of sales force automation by mid-sized manufacturers. J. Personal Selling Sales Management (1999) 19(2):59–74Google Scholar
• Sawhney M., Zabin J. Managing and measuring relational equity in the network economy. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (2002) 30:313–332Crossref, Google Scholar
• Saxe R., Weitz B. A. The SOCO scale: A measure of the customer orientation of salespeople. J. Marketing Res. (1982) 29:343–351Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sharda R., Barr S., McDonnell J. Decision support system effectiveness: A review and an empirical test. Management Sci. (1988) 34:139–159Link, Google Scholar
• Speier C., Venkatesh V. The hidden minefields in the adoption of sales force automation technologies. J. Marketing (2002) 66:98–111Crossref, Google Scholar
• Spiro R. L., Weitz B. A. Adaptive selling: Conceptualization, measurement, and nomological validity. J. Marketing Res. (1990) 27:61–69Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sproull L., Kiesler S. Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Sci. (1986) 32:1492–1501Link, Google Scholar
• Sujan H., Weitz B. A., Kumar N. Learning orientation, working smart, and effective selling. J. Marketing (1994) 58:39–48Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sujan H., Weitz B. A., Sujan M. Increasing sales productivity by getting salespeople to work smarter. J. Personal Selling Sales Management (1988) 8:9–19Google Scholar
• Sulek J., Maruchek A. A study of the impact of an integrated information technology on the time utilization of information workers. Decision Sci. (1992) 23:1174–1191Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sundaram S., Schwarz A., Jones E., Chin W. Technology use on the front line: How technology enhances individual performance. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (2007) 35:101–112Crossref, Google Scholar
• Szymanski D. Determinants of selling effectiveness: The importance of declarative knowledge to the personal selling concept. J. Marketing (1988) 52:64–77Crossref, Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V. Where to go from here? Thoughts on future directions for research on individual-level technology adoption with a focus on decision making. Decision Sci. (2006) 37(4):497–518Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weitz B. A., Sujan H., Sujan M. Knowledge, motivation, and adaptive behavior: A framework for improving selling effectiveness. J. Marketing (1986) 50:174–191Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zeithaml V. A., Berry L. L., Parasuraman A. Communication and control processes in the delivery of service quality. J. Marketing (1988) 52:35–48Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zmud R. W., Apple L. E. Measuring technology incorporation/infusion. J. Product Innovation Management (1992) 9:148–155Crossref, Google Scholar