A Theoretical Framework for Managing the New Product Development Portfolio: When and How to Use Strategic Buckets

References

• Adams M., Boike D. The PDMA foundation 2004 comparative performance assessment study. Visions (2004) 28(3):26–29Google Scholar
• Ali A., Kalwani M., Kovenock D. Selecting product development projects: Pioneering versus incremental innovation strategies. Management Sci. (1993) 39(3):255–274Link, Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya S., Kavadias S. Investments in sequential new product development with learning. (2007) . Working paper, INSEAD, Fontainebleau, FranceGoogle Scholar
• Brenner M. S. Practical R&D project prioritization. Res. Tech. Management (1994) 37(5):38–42Crossref, Google Scholar
• Business Week DuPont tries to unclog a pipeline. (2003) January 27):103–104Google Scholar
• Christensen C., Suarez F., Utterback J. Strategies for survival in fast-changing industries. Management Sci. (1998) 44(12):207–221Link, Google Scholar
• Christensen C., Verlinden M., Westerman G. Disruption, disintegration, and the dissipation of differentiability. Indust. Corporate Change (2002) 11(5Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cooper R., Edgett S. J., Kleinshmidt E. J.Portfolio Management for New Products (1998) (Perseus Books, New York) Google Scholar
• Denardo E., Rothblum U., Van der Heyden L. Index policies for stochastic search in a forest with applications to R&D project management. Math. Oper. Res. (2004) 29(1):162–181Link, Google Scholar
• Eppinger S., Whitney D., Smith R., Gebala D. A model-based method for organizing tasks in product development. Res. Engrg. Design (1994) 6(1):1–13Crossref, Google Scholar
• Financial Times Novartis first-half profits increase 12%. (2000) August 22Google Scholar
• Fleming L., Sorenson O. Science as a map in technological search. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25(8/9):909–929Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forbes Can kodak make up for lost moments? (2003) October 6Google Scholar
• Gavetti G., Levinthal D. Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2000) 45(1):113–137Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gittins J.Multi-Armed Bandit Allocation Indices (1989) (Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Hammonds J., Keeney R., Raiffa H. Even swaps: A rational method for making tradeoffs. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1998) 76(2):137–149Google Scholar
• Henderson R., Clark K. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(1):9–31Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kauffman S.The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution (1993) (Oxford University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kauffman S., Lobo J., Macready W. Optimal search on a technology landscape. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2000) 43(2):141–167Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kavadias S., Chao R., Loch C. H., Kavadias S. Resource allocation and new product development portfolio management. Handbook of New Product Development Management (2007) (Elsevier/Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK) 135–163Google Scholar
• Kavadias S., Loch C. H., Tapper U. A. S. Allocating the R&D budget at gemstone. (2005) . Working paper, INSEAD, Fontainebleau, FranceGoogle Scholar
• Levinthal D. Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Sci. (1997) 43(7):934–951Link, Google Scholar
• Liberatore M. J. An extension of the analytical hierarchy process for industrial R&D project selection. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (1987) 34(1):12–18Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loch C. H. Tailoring product development to strategy: The case of a European technology manufacturer. Eur. Management J. (2000) 18(3):246–258Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loch C. H., Kavadias S. Dynamic portfolio selection of NPD programs using marginal returns. Management Sci. (2002) 48(10):1227–1242Link, Google Scholar
• Loch C. H., Kavadias S. Managing new product development: An evolutionary framework. Handbook of New Product Development Management (2007) (Elsevier/Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK) 1–26Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loch C. H., Pich M., Urbschat M., Terwiesch C. Selecting R&D projects at BMW: A case study of adopting mathematical programming models. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (2001) 48(1):70–80Crossref, Google Scholar
• Macready W., Wolpert D. Bandit problems and the exploration/exploitation tradeoff. IEEE Trans. Evolutionary Comput. (1998) 2(1):2–22Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nelson R., Winter S.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (Belknap, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Ofek E., Srinivasan V. How much does the market value an improvement in a product attribute? Marketing Sci. (2002) 21(4):398–411Link, Google Scholar
• Rivkin J., Siggelkow N. Balancing search and stability: Interdependencies among elements of organizational design. Management Sci. (2003) 49(3):290–311Link, Google Scholar
• Roussel P., Saad K., Erickson T.Third Generation R&D Managing the Link to Corporate Strategy (1991) (Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Saaty T. How to make a decision: The analytical hierarchy process. Interfaces (1994) 24(6):19–43Link, Google Scholar
• Schumpeter J.The Theory of Economic Development (1934) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Shane S., Ulrich K. Technological innovation, product development, and entrepreneurship in management science. Management Sci. (2004) 50(2):133–144Link, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N., Levinthal D. Temporarily divide to conquer: Centralized, decentralized, and reintegrated organizational approaches to exploration and adaptation. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(6):650–669Link, Google Scholar
• Siggelkow N., Rivkin J. Speed and search: Designing organizations for turbulence and complexity. Organ. Sci. (2005) 16(2):101–122Link, Google Scholar
• Simon H.The Science of the Artificial (1969) (MIT Press, Boston) Google Scholar
• Smith W. Various optimizers for single-stage production. Naval Res. Logist. (1959) 3:59–66Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sommer S., Loch C. H. Selectionism and learning in projects with complexity and unforeseeable uncertainty. Management Sci. (2004) 50(10):1334–1347Link, Google Scholar
• Tushman M., Anderson P. Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1986) 31(3):439–465Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tushman M., O'Reilly C. Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Rev. (1996) 38(4):8–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Utterback J. Radical innovation and corporate regeneration. Res. Tech. Management (1994) 37(4):10–18Crossref, Google Scholar
• Van Mieghem J. Dynamic scheduling with convex delay costs: The generalized cμ rule. Ann. Appl. Probab. (1995) 5(3):809–833Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wheelwright S., Clark K.Revolutionizing New Product Development (1992) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Wu Y., Loch C. H., Van der Heyden L. A model of fair process and its limits. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2008) . ePub ahead of print January 4, http://msom.journal.informs.org/cgi/content/abstract/msom.1070.0189v1Link, Google Scholar