Effort, Revenue, and Cost Sharing Mechanisms for Collaborative New Product Development

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1010

References

  • Abbott L. Vertical equilibrium under pure quality competition. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1953) 43(5):826–845Google Scholar
  • Aghion P., Tirole J. The management of innovation. Quart. J. Econom. (1994) 109(4):1185–1209CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Amaldoss W., Meyer R., Raju J. S., Rapoport A. Collaborating to compete. Marketing Sci. (2000) 19(2):105–126LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson E. G., Parker G. G. Project sourcing decisions in the presence of learning and integration costs. (2002) . Working paper, University of Texas, AustinCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Austin American Statesman Alliances, consulting let IBM share research costs. (2003) April 21Google Scholar
  • Cachon G. P., Lariviere M. A. Supply chain coordination with revenue sharing contracts: Strengths and limitations. Management Sci. (2005) 51(1):30–44LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen C. M., Klepper S. A reprise of size and R&D. Econom. J. (1996) 106(437):925–951Google Scholar
  • Cohen W. M., Klepper S. The anatomy of industry R&D intensity distributions. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1992) 82(4):773–799Google Scholar
  • Cvsa V., Gilbert S. M. Strategic commitment versus postponement in a two-tier supply chain. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2002) 141(3):526–543CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Doz Y., Hamel G.Alliance Advantage: The Art of Creating Value Through Partnering (1998) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Dutta S., Weiss A. M. The relationship between a firm's level of technological innovativeness and its pattern of partnership agreements. Management Sci. (1997) 43(3):343–356LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dyer J. H.Collaborative Advantage: Winning Through Extended Enterprise Supplier Networks (2003) (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
  • Erat S., Kavadias S. Introduction of new technologies to competing industrial customers. Management Sci. (2006) 52(11):1675–1688LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Financial Times Dell takes on printer market. (2003) March 25Google Scholar
  • Fine C. H., Whitney D. E. Is the make-buy decision process a core competence? (1996) . Working Paper 140-96, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA. http://ideas.repec.org/p/mit/sloanp/2605.htmlGoogle Scholar
  • Gerwin D., Ferris J. S. Organizing new product development projects in strategic alliances. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(1):22–37LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gilbert S. M., Cvsa V. Strategic commitment to price to stimulate downstream innovation in a supply chain. Eur. J. Oper. Res. (2003) 150(3):617–639CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grahovac J., Parker G. G. Component modularity, external economies of scale and outsourcing decisions in the supply chain. (2002) . Working paper, Tulane University, New OrleansGoogle Scholar
  • Grossman S. J., Hart O. D. The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration. J. Political Econom. (1986) 94(4):691–719CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grover J. M. The evolving role of collaboration in biotechnology. Nature Biotechnology (1998) 16:31–32CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gupta S., Loulou R. Process innovation, product differentiation, and channel structure: Strategic incentives in a duoploy. Marketing Sci. (1998) 17(4):301–316LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hachman M. Dell to enter printer market with Lexmark. Extreme Tech (2002) September 24). http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,3973,551678,00.aspGoogle Scholar
  • Iansiti M. Technology integration: Managing technological evolution in a complex environment. Res. Policy (1995) 24:521–542CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jeuland A. P., Shugan S. M. Managing channel profits. Marketing Sci. (1983) 2(3):239–272LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kamien M. I., Schwartz N. L.Market Structure and Innovation: A Survey (1992) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
  • Krishnan V., Bhattacharya S. Technology selection and commitment in new product development: The role of uncertainty and design flexibility. Management Sci. (2002) 48(3):313–327LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lee E., Staelin R. Vertical strategic interaction: Implications for channel pricing strategy. Marketing Sci. (1997) 16(3):185–207LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Loch C. H., Terwiesch C. Communication and uncertainty in concurrent engineering. Management Sci. (1998) 44(8):1032–1048LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McGuire T. W., Staelin R. An industry equilibrium analysis of downstream vertical integration. Marketing Sci. (1983) 2(2):161–191LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nash J. The bargaining problem. Econometrica (1950) 18(2):155–162CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nash J. Two-person cooperative games. Econometrica (1953) 21(1):128–140CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Novak S., Eppinger S. Sourcing by design: Product complexity and the supply chain. Management Sci. (2001) 47(1):189–204LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Owen G.Game Theory (1995) 3rd ed.(Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Quinn J. B. Outsourcing innovation: The new engine for growth. Sloan Management Rev. (2000) 41(4):13–28Google Scholar
  • Spencer B., Brander J. Pre-commitment and flexibility: Applications to oligopoly theory. Eur. Econom. Rev. (1992) 36(8):1601–1626CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thomke S. H., Krishnan V., Nimgade A. Product development at Dell Computer Corporation. (1999) . HBS Case 9-699-010, Harvard Business School, BostonGoogle Scholar
  • Ulrich K. T., Ellison D. Beyond make-buy: Internalization and integration of design and production. Production Oper. Management (2005) 14(4):315–330Google Scholar
  • Whalen J. Glaxo gives actelion sweet deal for drug. Wall Street Journal (2008) July 15):B9Google Scholar
  • Zenger T. R. Explaining organizational diseconomies of scale in R&D: Agency problems and the allocation of engineering talent, ideas, and effort by firm size. Management Sci. (1994) 40(6):708–729LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.