Relative Performance Compensation, Contests, and Dynamic Incentives

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1021

References

  • Al-Najjar N. I. Large games and the law of large numbers. Games Econom. Behav. (2008) 64:1–34CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson T. W., Hsiao C. Formulation and estimation of dynamic models using panel data. J. Econometrics (1982) 18:47–82CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Antle R., Smith A. An empirical investigation of the relative performance evaluation of corporate executives. J. Accounting Res. (1986) 24(1):1–39CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arellano M., Bond S. Some tests of specification for panel data: MonteCarlo evidence & application to employment equations. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1991) 58:277–297CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bandiera O., Barankay I., Rasul I. Social preferences and the response to incentives: Evidence from personnel data. Quart. J. Econom. (2005) 120(3):917–962Google Scholar
  • Brickley J., Zimmerman J. Changing incentives in a multitask environment: Evidence from a top-tier business school. J. Corporate Finance (2001) 7:367–396CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bull C., Schotter A., Weigelt K. Tournaments and piece rates: An experimental study. J. Political Econom. (1987) 95(1):1–33CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Casas-Arce P., Martínez-Jerez F. A. The all-pay auction with handicaps. (2009) . Working paper, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, SpainGoogle Scholar
  • Ehrenberg R., Bognanno M. Do tournaments have incentive effects? J. Political Econom. (1990) 98(6):1307–1324CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feltham G., Xie J. Performance measure congruity and diversity in multi-task principal/agent relations. Accounting Rev. (1994) 69(3):429–453Google Scholar
  • Gibbons R., Murphy K. Relative performance evaluation for chief executive officers. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. (1990) 43:30–51CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gibbs M. Promotions and incentives. (1996) . Working paper, University of Chicago, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  • Hannan L., Krishnan R., Newman A. The effects of disseminating relative performance feedback in tournament and individual performance compensation plans. Accounting Rev. (2008) 83(4):893–913CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holmstrom B. Moral hazard in teams. Bell J. Econom. (1982) 13:324–340CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holmstrom B., Milgrom P. Aggregation and linearity in the provision of intertemporal incentives. Econometrica (1987) 55(2):303–328CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holmstrom B., Milgrom P. Multi-task principal-agent analyses: Incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design. J. Law, Econom., Organ. (1991) 7:24–52CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Knoeber C., Thurman W. Testing the theory of tournaments: An empirical analysis of broiler production. J. Labor Econom. (1994) 12(2):155–179CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazear E. Performance pay and productivity. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2000) 90:1346–61CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazear E., Rosen S. Rank-order tournaments as optimum labor contracts. J. Political Econom. (1981) 89(5):841–864CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Locke E. A., Latham G. P.A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance (1990) (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Main B., O'Reilly C., Wade J. Top executive pay: Tournament or teamwork? J. Labor Econom. (1993) 11(4):606–628CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Matsumura E., Shin J. An empirical analysis of an incentive plan with relative performance measures: Evidence from a postal service. Accounting Rev. (2006) 81:533–566CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Meyer M. Biased contests and moral hazard: Implications for career profiles. Annales d'Économie et de Statistique (1992) 25/26:165–187CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moldovanu B., Sela A. The optimal allocation of prizes in contests. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2001) 91(3):542–558CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Müller W., Schotter A. Workaholics and dropouts in organizations. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. (2009) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Murphy K., Ashenfelter O., Card D. Executive compensation. Handbook of Labor Economics (1999) 3B(North Holland, Amsterdam) 2485–2563chap 38Google Scholar
  • Nickell S. Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica (1981) 49:1417–1426CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Orrison A., Schotter A., Weigelt K. Multiperson tournaments: An experimental examination. Management Sci. (2004) 50(2):268–279LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rosen S. Prizes and incentives in elimination tournaments. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1986) 76:701–715Google Scholar
  • Skinner B. F.Contingencies of Reinforcement (1969) (Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York) Google Scholar
  • Slade M. Multitask agency and contract choice: An empirical exploration. Internat. Econom. Rev. (1996) 37:465–86CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vroom V. H.Work and Motivation (1964) (John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.