Lone Inventors as Sources of Breakthroughs: Myth or Reality?

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1072

References

  • Ahuja G., Lampert C. Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: A longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22(6–7):521–543CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Albert M. B., Narin F., Avery D., McAllister P. Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents. Res. Policy (1991) 20:251–259CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baron R., Kenny D. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1986) 51(6):1173–1182CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Basalla G.The Evolution of Technology (1988) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Bikhchandani S., Hirshleifer D., Welch I. A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades. J. Political Econom. (1992) 100(5):992–1026CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brefka P. (2006) . Personal interview, July 10, BostonGoogle Scholar
  • Burt R. Structural holes and good ideas. Amer. J. Sociol. (2004) 110(2):349–99CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Campbell D. Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psych. Rev. (1960) 67:380–400CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Clogg C., Petkova E., Haritou A. Statistical methods for comparing regression coefficients between models. Amer. J. Sociol. (1995) 100:1261–1293CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Csikszentmihalyi M.Creativity (1999) (Harper Collins, New York) Google Scholar
  • Dahan E., Mendelson H. An extreme-value model of concept testing. Management Sci. (2001) 47(1):102–116LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dahlin K., Taylor M., Fichman M. Today's Edisons or weekend hobbyists: Technical merit and success of inventions by independent inventors. Res. Policy (2004) 33(8):1167–1183CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Diehl M., Stroebe W. Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1987) 53:497–509CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dougherty D. Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(2):179–202LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fleming L. Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Sci. (2001) 47(1):117–132LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fleming L. Finding the organizational sources of breakthrough invention: The story of Hewlett Packard's ink jet invention. Indust. Corporate Change (2002) 11(5):1059–1084CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fleming L. Breakthroughs and the “long tail” of innovation. Sloan Management Rev. (2007) 49(1):69–74Google Scholar
  • Fleming L., King C., Juda A. Small worlds and innovation. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(6):938–954LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gilfillan S. C.The Sociology of Invention (1935) (Follett Publishing, Chicago) . (Reprinted 1970. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.)Google Scholar
  • Girotra K., Terwiesch C., Ulrich K. Idea generation and the quality of the best idea. (2007) . Working paper, INSEAD, Fontainebleau, FranceGoogle Scholar
  • Grant R. M. Toward a knowledge-base theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:109–122CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hall B., Jaffe A., Trajtenberg M. Market value and patent citations. RAND J. Econom. (2005) 1:16–38Google Scholar
  • Harhoff D., Narin F., Scherer F., Vopel K. Citation frequency and the value of patented inventions. Rev. Econom. Statist. (1999) 81(3):511–515CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hooker C., Nakamura J., Csikszentmihalyi M., Paulus P., Nijstad B. The group as mentor: Social capital and the systems model of creativity. Group Creativity: Innovation Through Collaboration (2003) (Oxford University Press, New York) 225–244CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hughes T.American Genesis: A Century of Invention and Technological Enthusiasm 1870–1970 (2004) (Chicago University Press, Chicago) Google Scholar
  • Jaffe A., Trajtenberg M.Patents, Citations and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Janis I.Victims of Groupthink (1972) (Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Kavadias S., Sommer S. The effects of problem structure and team expertise on brainstorming effectiveness. (2007) . Working paperGoogle Scholar
  • Kenney S. (2006) . Personal interview, August 13, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • King G. Variance specification in event count models: From restrictive assumptions to a generalized estimator. Amer. J. Political Sci. (1989) 33(3):762–84CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Koenker R., Bassett G. W. Regression quantiles. Econometrica (1978) 46:33–50CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kogut B., Zander U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organ. Sci. (1992) 3(3):383–397LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Leonard-Barton D., Swap W.When Sparks Fly: Igniting Creativity in Groups (1999) (Harvard Business Press, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Levin R., Klevorick A., Nelson R., Winter S. Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development: Comments and discussion. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (1987) 3:783–831CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):71–87LinkGoogle Scholar
  • McFadyen M., Cannella A. Social capital and knowledge creation: Diminishing returns of the number and strength of exchange relationships. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47(5):735–746CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mokyr J.The Lever of Riches: Technological Creativity and Economic Progress (1990) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Mullen B., Johnson C., Salas E. Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta-analytic integration. Basic Appl. Soc. Psych. (1991) 12:3–23CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson R., Winter S.An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change (1982) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Office of Technology Assessment and Forecast U.S. Department of Commerce, Patent and Trademark Office, Sixth Report. (1976) (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
  • Paulus P., Brown V., Paulus P., Nijstad B. Enhancing ideational creativity in groups: Lessons from research and brainstorming. Group Creativity: Innovation Through Collaboration (2003) (Oxford University Press, New York) 110–136CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Paulus P., Nijstad B. Group creativity: An introduction. Group Creativity: Innovation Through Collaboration (2003) (Oxford University Press, New York) 3–12CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Perry-Smith J. E., Shalley C. E. The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective. Acad. Management Rev. (2003) 28:89–106CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ratliff E. Me translate pretty one day. Wired (2006) 14(12):210–213Google Scholar
  • Romer P. Ideas and things: The concept of production is being re-tooled. The Economist (1993) 328(7828):70–72Google Scholar
  • Runco M., Montuori A., Purser R. Creativity need not be social. Social Creativity (1999) 1(Hampton Press, Creskill, NJ) 237–264Google Scholar
  • Runco M., Smith W. Interpersonal and intrapersonal evaluations of creative ideas. Personality Individual Differences (1991) 13:295–302CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schumpeter J. A.The Theory of Economic Development (1934) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Simonton D. Quality, quantity, and age: The careers of 10 distinguished psychologists. Internat. J. Aging Human Development (1985) 21:241–254CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simonton D. K.Origins of Genius: Darwinian Perspectives on Creativity (1999) (Oxford University Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Singh J. Collaborative networks as determinants of knowledge diffusion patterns. Management Sci. (2005) 51(5):756–770LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Singh J. Asymmetry of knowledge spillovers between MNCs and host country firms. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (2007) 38(5):764–786CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Singh J. Distributed R&D, cross-regional knowledge integration and quality of innovative output. Res. Policy (2008) 37(1):77–96CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith A.Lectures on Jurisprudence (1766) . (Reprinted 1982. Lectures on Jurisprudence (Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith, Vol. 5). Liberty Fund, Indianapolis.)Google Scholar
  • Steinbeck J.East of Eden (1952) (Putnam Penguin, New York) Google Scholar
  • Sutton R., Hargadon A. Brainstorming groups in context: Effectiveness in a product design firm. Administration Sci. Quart. (1996) 41(4):685–718CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taylor A., Greve H. Superman or the Fantastic Four? Knowledge combination and experience in innovative teams. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49(4):723–740CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Trajtenberg M. A penny for your quotes: Patent citations and the value of innovations. RAND J. Econom. (1990) 21:172–187CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Trajtenberg M., Shiff G., Melamed R. The “names game”: Harnessing inventors' patent data for economic research. (2006) . NBER Working Paper 12479, National Bureau of Economic, Research, Cambridge, MACrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Uzzi B., Spiro J. Collaboration and creativity: The small world problem. Amer. J. Sociol. (2005) 111:447–504CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Watts D., Strogatz S. Collective dynamics of small-world networks. Nature (1998) 393:440–442CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weitzman M. Recombinant growth. Quart. J. Econom. (1998) 113:331–360CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wuchty S., Jones B., Uzzi B. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science (2007) 316(5827):1036–1039CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.