An Example and a Proposal Concerning the Correlation of Worker Processing Times in Parallel Tasks

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1080

References

  • Adams S. J., Derkowitz L. Inequity in social exchange. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (1965) 2(Academic Press, New York) 267–299CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Adams J. S., Freedman S., Berkowitz L., Walster E. Equity theory revisited: Comments and annotated bibliography. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (1976) 2(Academic Press, New York) 43–90Google Scholar
  • Argote L.Organizational Learning: Creating and Transferring Knowledge (1999) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Bendoly E., Hur D. Bipolarity in reactions to operatopnal “constraints”: OM bugs under an OB lens. J. Oper. Management (2007) 25(1):1–13CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blake M. J. F. Time of day effects on performance in a range of tasks. Psychodynamic Sci. (1967) 9:349–350CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bobrowski P. M., Park P. S. An evaluation of labor assignment rules when workers are not perfectly interchangeable. J. Oper. Management (1993) 11(3):257–268CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boyer K. K., Swink M. L. Empirical elephants—Why multiple methods are essential to quality research in operations and supply chain management. J. Oper. Management (2008) 26:337–348CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Camacho L. M., Paulus P. B. The role of social anxiousness in group brainstorming. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1995) 68(6):1071–1080CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Colquitt J. A., Conlon D. E., Wesson M. J., Porter C. O. L. H., Ng K. Y. Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. J. Appl. Psych. (2001) 86(3):425–445CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dallery Y., Gershwin S. B. Manufacturing flow line systems: A review of models and analytical results. Queuing Systems (1992) 12(1–2):3–94CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Doerr K. H., Mitchell T. R., Klastorin T. D., Brown K. A. Impact of material flow policies and goals on job outcomes. J. Appl. Psych. (1996) 81(2):142–152CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Donovan J. J., Anderson N., Ones D. S., Sinangil H. K., Viswesvaran C. Work motivation. Handbook of Industrial, Work and Organizational Psychology (2001) 2(Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA) 53–76Chap. 3CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dreher G. F., Ash R. A., Hancock P. The role of the traditional research design in underestimating the validity of the employment interview. Personnel Psych. (1988) 41(2):315–327CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Edie L. C. Traffic delays at toll booths. J. Oper. Res. Soc. America (1954) 2(2):107–138LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Festinger L. A theory of social comparison process. Human Relations (1954) 7:117–140CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fisher R. Personal communication with K. L. Schultz, February 26. (2009) . University of Alberta School of Business, AB, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  • Goodman P. S. An examination of referents used in evaluations of pay. Org. Behav. Human Perf. (1974) 12:170–195CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greenberg J., Greenberg J., Cohen R. L. Approaching equity and avoiding inequity in groups and organizations. Equity and Justice in Social Behavior (1982) (Academic Press, New York) 389–436CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hertel G., Kerr N. L., Messé L. A. Motivation gains in performance groups: Paradigmatic and theoretical developments on the Köhler effect. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2000) 79(4):580–601CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hopp W. J. Fifty years of Management Science. Management Sci. (2004) 50(1):1–7LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Huseman R. C., Hatfield J. D., Miles E. W. A new perspective on equity theory: The equity sensitivity construct. Acad. Management Rev. (1987) 12(2):222–234CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kerr N. L., Messé L. A., Seok D., Sambolec E. J., Lount R. B., Park E. S. Psychological mechanisms underlying the Köhler motivation gain. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. (2007) 33(6):828–841CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Laird D. A. Relative performance of college students as conditioned by time of day and day of week. J. Experiment. Psych. (1925) 8(1):50–63CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Latane B., Williams K., Harkins S. Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1979) 37(6):822–832CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lawler E. E.Motivation in Work Organizations (1973) (Brooks/Cole Publishers, Belmont, CA) Google Scholar
  • McClain J. K., Schultz K. L., Thomas L. J. Management of worksharing systems. Manufacturing Service Oper. Management (2000) 2(1):49–67LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Melnyk S. A., Handfield R. B. May you live in interesting times…the emergence of theory-driven empirical research. J. Oper. Management (1998) 16(4):311–319CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mowday R. T., Steers R. M., Porter L. W. Equity theory predictions of behavior in organizations. Motivation and Work Behavior (1979) (McGraw Hill, New York) 89–110Google Scholar
  • Nembhard D. A., Uzumeri M. V. An individual-based description of learning within an organization. IEEE Trans. Engrg. Management (2000a) 47(3):370–378CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nembhard D. A., Uzumeri M. V. Experiential learning and forgetting for manual and cognitive tasks. Internat. J. Indust. Ergonomics (2000b) 25(4):315–326CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Opsahl R. L., Dunnette M. The role of financial compensation in industrial motivation. Psych. Bull. (1966) 66(2):94–118CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parkinson C. N. Parkinson's law. The Economist (1955) 177:23–25Google Scholar
  • Patchen M. A conceptual framework and some empirical data regarding comparisons of social rewards. Sociometry (1961) 24:136–156CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Paulus P. B., Dzindolet M. T. Social influence processes in group brainstorming. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1993) 64(4):575–586CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Powell S. G., Schultz K. L. Throughput in serial lines with state-dependent behavior. Management Sci. (2004) 50(8):1095–1105LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Pritchard R. D. Equity theory: A review and critique. Organ Behav. Human Performance (1969) 4(2):176–211CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ronen S.Comparative and Multinational Management (1986) (Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Schultz K. L., Juran D., Boudreau J. The effects of low inventory on the development of productivity norms. Management Sci. (1999) 45(12):1664–1678LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Schultz K. L., McLain J. O., Robinson L. W., Thomas L. J. The use of framing in inventory decisions. (2008) . Working paper, Johnson School of Management, Cornell University, Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
  • Schultz K. L., Juran D., Boudreau J., McClain J., Thomas L. J. Modeling and worker motivation in JIT production systems. Management Sci. (1998) 44(12):1595–1607LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Shafer S. M., Nembhard D. A., Uzumeri M. V. The effects of worker learning, forgetting, and heterogeneity on assembly line productivity. Management Sci. (2001) 47(12):1639–1653LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Siemsen E., Balasubramanian S., Roth A. V. Incentives that induce task-related effort, helping and knowledge sharing in workgroups. Management Sci. (2007) 53(1):1533–1550LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Stratman J. K., Roth A. V., Gilland W. G. The deployment of temporary production workers in assembly operations: A case study of the hidden costs of learning and forgetting. J. Oper. Management (2004) 21(5):689–707CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Summers T. P., DeNisi A. S. In Search of Adams' other: Reexamination of referents used in the evaluation of pay. Human Relations (1990) 43(6):497–511CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Telly C. S., French W. L., Scott W. G. The relationship of inequity to turnover among hourly workers. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1971) 16:164–172CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tolman E. C., Koch S. Principles of purposive behaviorism. Psychology: A Study of Science (1959) 2(McGraw-Hill, New York) 92–157Google Scholar
  • Uzumeri M. V., Nembhard D. A. A population of learners: A new way to measure organizational learning. J. Oper. Management (1998) 16(5):515–528CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wong P. S. P, Cheung S. O., Hardcastle Cl. Embodying learning effect in performance prediction. J. Construction Engrg. Management (2007) 133(6):474–482CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yerkes R. M., Dodson J. D. The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit-formation. J. Comparative Neurology Psych. (1908) 18:459–482CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.