A Quantitative Measurement of Regret Theory
Published Online:6 Nov 2009https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1097
References
- Parameter-free elicitation of utility and probability weighting functions. Management Sci. (2000) 46(11):1497–1512Link, Google Scholar
- Reconciling introspective utility with revealed preference: Experimental arguments based on prospect theory. J. Econometrics (2007a) 138(1):356–378Crossref, Google Scholar
- A tractable method to measure utility and loss aversion under prospect theory. J. Risk Uncertainty (2008) 36(3):245–266Crossref, Google Scholar
- Measuring loss aversion under prospect theory: A parameter-free approach. Management Sci. (2007b) 53(10):1659–1674Link, Google Scholar
- Choice-based elicitation and decomposition of decision weights for gains and losses under uncertainty. Management Sci. (2005) 51(9):1384–1399Link, Google Scholar
- What drives the disposition effect? An analysis of a long-standing preference-based explanation. J. Finance (2009) 64(2):751–784Crossref, Google Scholar
- Individual preferences, monetary gambles, and stock market participation: A case for narrow framing. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2006) 96(4):1069–1090Crossref, Google Scholar
- The impact of incentives upon risky choice experiments. J. Risk Uncertainty (1997) 14(2):155–168Crossref, Google Scholar
- Regret in decision making under uncertainty. Oper. Res. (1982) 30(5):961–981Link, Google Scholar
- Risk premiums for decision regret. Management Sci. (1983) 29(10):1156–1166Link, Google Scholar
- An experimental investigation of violations of transitivity in choice under uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty (2008) 37(1):77–91Crossref, Google Scholar
- A parameter-free elicitation of the probability weighting function in medical decision analysis. Management Sci. (2000) 46(11):1485–1496Link, Google Scholar
- The impact of regret on the demand for insurance. J. Risk Insurance (2004) 71(4):737–767Crossref, Google Scholar
- On the validity of the random lottery incentive system. Experiment. Econom. (1998) 1(2):115–131Crossref, Google Scholar
- A direct test of the original version of regret theory. J. Behav. Decision Making (1988) 1(1):43–56Crossref, Google Scholar
- Regret and feedback information in first-price sealed-bid auctions. Management Sci. (2008) 54(4):808–819Link, Google Scholar
- Is probability weighting sensitive to the magnitude of consequences? An experimental investigation on losses. J. Risk Uncertainty (2004) 28(3):217–235Crossref, Google Scholar
- Auctions with anticipated regret: Theory and experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2007) 97(4):1407–1418Crossref, Google Scholar
- Measuring the utility of losses by means of the trade-off method. J. Risk Uncertainty (1998) 17(3):277–295Crossref, Google Scholar
- Non-transitive measurable utility. J. Math. Psych. (1982) 26(1):31–67Crossref, Google Scholar
- Individual decisions under risk, risk sharing, and asset prices with regret. (2006) . Working paper, University of Toulouse, Toulouse, FranceGoogle Scholar
- On the form of the probability weighting function. Cognitive Psych. (1999) 38(1):129–166Crossref, Google Scholar
- , Cox J. C., Harrison G. W. Risk aversion in the laboratory. Risk Aversion in Experiments. Research in Experimental Economics (2008) 12(Emerald, Bingley, UK) 41–196Crossref, Google Scholar
- Does prospect theory explain the disposition effect? (2006) . Working paper, University of Zurich, ZurichGoogle Scholar
- Regret aversion or event-splitting effects? More evidence under risk and uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty (1995) 11(3):263–274Crossref, Google Scholar
- Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica (1979) 47(2):263–291Crossref, Google Scholar
- Foundations of Measurement (1971) 1(Academic Press, New York) Google Scholar
- Motivational factors in decision theories: The role of self-protection. Psych. Bull. (1993) 113(3):440–450Crossref, Google Scholar
- Regret theory: An alternative theory of rational choice. Econom. J. (1982) 92(368):805–824Google Scholar
- Some implications of a more general form of regret theory. J. Econom. Theory (1987) 41(2):270–287Crossref, Google Scholar
- Observing violations of transitivity by experimental methods. Econometrica (1991) 59(2):425–439Crossref, Google Scholar
- Regret, pride, and the disposition effect. (2007) . Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
- Regret, portfolio choice, and guarantees in defined contribution schemes. Insurance, Math., Econom. (2006) 39(2):219–229Crossref, Google Scholar
- Regret in the newsvendor model with partial information. Oper. Res. (2008) 56(1):188–203Link, Google Scholar
- Explaining heterogeneity in utility functions by individual differences in decision modes. J. Econom. Psych. (2006) 27(3):386–401Crossref, Google Scholar
- Developments in non-expected utility theory: The hunt for a descriptive theory of choice under risk. J. Econom. Literature (2000) 38(2):332–382Crossref, Google Scholar
- Does the random-lottery incentive system elicit true preferences? An experimental investigation. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1991) 81(4):971–978Google Scholar
- Testing for juxtaposition and event-splitting effects. J. Risk Uncertainty (1993) 6(3):235–254Crossref, Google Scholar
- Cumulative prospect theory's functional menagerie. J. Risk Uncertainty (2006) 32(2):101–130Crossref, Google Scholar
- Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty (1992) 5(4):297–323Crossref, Google Scholar
- Contingent weighting in judgment and choice. Psych. Rev. (1988) 95(3):371–384Crossref, Google Scholar
- Eliciting von Neumann-Morgenstern utilities when probabilities are distorted or unknown. Management Sci. (1996) 42(8):1131–1150Link, Google Scholar
- Anticipated regret, expected feedback and behavioral decision making. J. Behav. Decision Making (1999) 12(2):93–106Crossref, Google Scholar
- Consequences of regret aversion: Effects of expected feedback on risky decision making. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes (1996) 65(2):148–158Crossref, Google Scholar

