The Impact of Misalignment of Organizational Structure and Product Architecture on Quality in Complex Product Development

References

• Adler P. S., Mandelbaum A., Nguyen V., Schwerer E. From project to process management: An empirically-based framework for analyzing product development time. Management Sci. (1995) 41(3):458–484Link, Google Scholar
• Baldwin C. Y., Clark K. B.Design Rules: The Power of Modularity (2000) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baltagi B.Econometric Analysis of Panel Data (2001) 2nd ed.(John Wiley & Sons, New York) Google Scholar
• Bennett J., Boudette N. E. Ford and GM show gains in quality survey. Wall Street Journal (2008) June 5). http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121259964651445519.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Borgatti S. P., Everett M. G., Freeman L. C.UCINET for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis (2002) (Analytic Technologies, Harvard, MA) Google Scholar
• Brown S. L., Eisenhardt K. M. Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions. Acad. Management Rev. (1995) 20(2):343–378Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burt R. S. Structural holes and good ideas. Amer. J. Sociol. (2004) 110(2):349–399Crossref, Google Scholar
• Carlile P. R. A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(4):442–455Link, Google Scholar
• Clark K. B., Fujimoto T. The power of product integrity. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1990) 68(November–December):107–118Google Scholar
• Clark K. B., Fujimoto T.Product Development Performance: Strategy, Organization, and Management in the World Auto Industry (1991) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
• Clark K. B., Chew W. B., Fujimoto T., Meyer J., Scherer F. M. Product development in the world auto industry. Brookings Papers Econom. Activity (1987) 1987(3):729–781Crossref, Google Scholar
• Contractor N. S., Monge P. R. Managing knowledge networks. Management Comm. Quart. (2002) 16(2):249–258Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cook R. D., Weisberg S.Residuals and Influence in Regression (1982) (Chapman and Hall, London) Google Scholar
• Ethiraj S. K., Levinthal D. Modularity and innovation in complex systems. Management Sci. (2004) 50(2):159–173Link, Google Scholar
• Fleming L., Sorenson O. Science as a map in technological search. Strategic Management J. (2004) 25:909–928Crossref, Google Scholar
• Greene W. H.Econometric Analysis (2008) 6th ed.(Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ) Google Scholar
• Hansen M. T. Knowledge networks: Explaining effective knowledge sharing in multiunit companies. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(3):232–248Link, Google Scholar
• Hausman J. A. Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica (1978) 46(6):1251–1271Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman J. J., Borjas G. J. Does unemployment cause future unemployment? Definitions, questions and answers from a continuous-time model of heterogeneity and state dependence. Economica (1980) 47(187):247–283Crossref, Google Scholar
• Henderson R. M., Clark K. B. Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1990) 35(1):9–30Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hsiao C.Analysis of Panel Data (1986) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Google Scholar
• Huang G. Q., Mak K. L. Current practices of engineering change management in UK manufacturing industries. Internat. J. Oper. Production Management (1999) 19(1):21–37Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ibarra H. Network centrality, power, and innovation involvement: Determinants of technical and administrative roles. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36(3):471–501Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jensen C. Design quirks erode '06 quality ratings. New York Times (2006) June 11). http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/11/automobiles/11QUALITY.htmlGoogle Scholar
• Kraatz M. S., Zajac E. J. How organizational resources affect strategic change and performance in turbulent environments: Theory and evidence. Organ. Sci. (2001) 12(5):632–657Link, Google Scholar
• Krackhardt D., Hanson J. R. Informal networks: The company behind the chart. Harvard Bus. Rev. (1993) 71(4):104–111Google Scholar
• Krishnan V., Ulrich K. T. Product development decisions: A review of the literature. Management Sci. (2001) 47(1):1–21Link, Google Scholar
• Loch C. H., Terwiesch C. Accelerating the process of engineering change orders: Capacity and congestion effects. J. Product Innovation Management (1999) 16(2):145–159Crossref, Google Scholar
• McGregor J. The world's most innovative companies. Bus. Week (2006) April 24). http://www.businessweek.com/print/magazine/content/06_17/b3981401.htmGoogle Scholar
• Mihm J., Loch C., Huchzermier A. Problem-solving oscillations in complex engineering projects. Management Sci. (2003) 49(6):733–750Link, Google Scholar
• Nerkar A., Paruchuri S. Evolution of R&D capabilities: The role of knowledge networks within a firm. Management Sci. (2005) 51(5):771–785Link, Google Scholar
• Nonaka I., Takeuchi H.The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation (1995) (Oxford University Press, New York) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Petersen T., Koput K. W. Density dependence in organizational mortality: Legitimacy or unobserved heterogeneity? Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1991) 56(3):399–409Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sanchez R., Mahoney J. T. Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design. Strategic Management J. (1996) 17:63–76Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schilling M. A. Toward a general modular systems theory and its application to interfirm product modularity. Acad. Management Rev. (2002) 25(2):312–334Google Scholar
• Song J., Almeida P., Wu G. Learning-by-hiring: When is mobility more likely to facilitate interfirm knowledge transfer? Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):351–365Link, Google Scholar
• Sosa M. E., Eppinger S. D., Rowles C. M. The misalignment of product architecture and organizational structure in complex product development. Management Sci. (2004) 50(12):1674–1689Link, Google Scholar
• Sosa M. E., Gargiulo M., Rowles C. Component connectivity, team network structure and the attention to technical interfaces in complex product development. (2007) . Working paper, INSEAD, FranceCrossref, Google Scholar
• Terwiesch C., Loch C. H. Managing the process of engineering change orders: The case of the climate control system in automobile development. J. Product Innovation Management (1999) 16(2):160–172Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ulrich K. The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Res. Policy (1995) 24(3):419–441Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wasserman S., Faust K.Social Network Analysis (1994) (Cambridge University Press, London) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wooldridge J. M.Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar