Reality Check: Combining Choice Experiments with Market Data to Estimate the Importance of Product Attributes

References

• Allenby G. M., Ginter J. L. Using extremes to design products and segment markets. J. Marketing Res. (1995) 32(4):392–349Crossref, Google Scholar
• Andrews R. L., Ainslie A., Currim I. S. An empirical comparison of logit choice models with discrete versus continuous representations of heterogeneity. J. Marketing Res. (2002) 39(11):479–487Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ben-Akiva M., Morikawa T. Estimation of switching models from revealed preferences and stated intentions. Transportation Res. A (1990) 24A(6):485–495Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ben-Akiva M., Bradley M., Morikawa T., Benjamin J., Novak T., Oppewal H., Rao V. Combining revealed and stated preferences data. Marketing Lett. (1994) 5(4):335–350Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bhat C. R., Castelar S. A unified mixed logit framework for modeling revealed and stated preferences: Formulation and application to congestion pricing analysis in the San Francisco Bay area. Transportation Res. B (2002) 36(7):593–616Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blamey R., Bennett J., Bennett J., Blamey R. Yea-saying and validation of a choice model of green product choice. The Choice Modeling Approach to Environmental Valuation (2001) (Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA) 178–201Google Scholar
• Bradley M., Daly A. Use of the logit scaling approach to test for rank-order and fatigue effects in stated preference data. Transportation (1994) 21(2):167–184Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brooks S. P., Gelman A. General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations. J. Comput. Graphical Statist. (1998) 7(4):434–455Google Scholar
• Brownstone D., Bunch D. S., Train K. Joint mixed logit models of stated and revealed preferences for alternative-fuel vehicles. Transportation Res. B (2000) 34(5):315–338Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chib S., Greenberg E. Analysis of multivariate probit models. Biometrika (1998) 85(2):347–361Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ding M., Grewal R., Liechty J. Incentive-aligned conjoint analysis. J. Marketing Res. (2005) 42(1):67–82Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Bruyn A., Liechty J. C., Huizingh E. K. R. E., Lilien G. L. Offering online recommendations with minimum customer input through conjoint-based decision aids. Marketing Sci. (2008) 27(3):443–460Link, Google Scholar
• Dominici F., Parmigiani G., Reckhow K. H., Wolpert R. L. Combining information from related regressions. J. Agricultural, Biol. Environ. Statist. (1997) 2(3):313–332Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fennell G., Allenby G. M., Yang S., Edwards Y. The effectiveness of demographic and psychographic variables for explaining brand and product category use. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2003) 1(2):223–244Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbride T. J., Lenk P. J., Brazell J. D. Market share constraints and the loss function in choice-based conjoint analysis. Marketing Sci. (2008) 27(6):995–1011Link, Google Scholar
• Green P. E., Rao V. R. Conjoint measurement for quantifying judgmental data. J. Marketing Res. (1971) 8(3):355–363Crossref, Google Scholar
• Green P. E., Krieger A. M., Wind Y. J. Thirty years of conjoint analysis: Reflections and prospects. Interfaces (2001) 31(3):S56-S73Google Scholar
• Haario H., Saksman E., Tamminen J. An adaptive metropolis algorithm. Bernoulli (2001) 7(2):223–242Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heckman J. J. Sample bias as a specification error. Econometrica (1979) 47(1):153–162Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ibrahim J. G., Lipsitz S. R., Chen M.-H. Missing covariates in generalized linear models when the missing data mechanism is non-ignorable. J. Roy. Statist. Soc., Ser. B (1999) 61(1):173–190Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krishnan V., Ulrich K. T. Product development decisions: A review of the literature. Management Sci. (2001) 47(1):1–21Link, Google Scholar
• Little R. J. A., Rubin D. B.Statistical Analysis with Missing Data (2002) 2nd ed.(Wiley Interscience, Hoboken, NJ) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Louviere J. J., Hensher D. A., Swait J. D.Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Application (2000) (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Louviere J. J., Meyer R. J., Bunch D. S., Carson R., Dellaert B., Hanemann W. M., Hensher D., Irwin J. Combining sources of preference data for modeling complex decision processes. Marketing Lett. (1999) 10(3):205–217Crossref, Google Scholar
• Manski C. F., Lerman S. R. The estimation of choice probabilities from choice based samples. Econometrica (1977) 45(8):1977–1988Crossref, Google Scholar
• McCulloch R., Rossi P. E. An exact likelihood analysis of the multinomial probit model. J. Econometrics (1994) 64(1–2):207–240Crossref, Google Scholar
• Newton M. A., Raftery A. E. Approximate Bayesian inference with the weighted likelihood bootstrap. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B (Methodological) (1994) 56(1):3–48Google Scholar
• Orme B., Johnson R. External effect adjustments in conjoint analysis. (2006) . Research paper, Sawtooth Software, Sequim, WAGoogle Scholar
• Rossi P. E., Allenby G. M., McCulloch R.Bayesian Statistics and Marketing (2005) (John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, UK) Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sándor Z., Wedel M. Profile construction in experimental choice designs for mixed logit models. Marketing Sci. (2002) 21(4):455–475Link, Google Scholar
• Swait J., Andrews R. L. Enriching scanner panel models with choice experiments. Marketing Sci. (2003) 22(4):442–460Link, Google Scholar
• Swait J., Louviere J. The role of the scale parameter in the estimation and comparison of multinomial logit models. J. Marketing Res. (1993) 30(3):305–314Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tanner M. A., Wong W. H. The calculation of posterior distributions by data augmentation. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. (1987) 82(398):528–540Crossref, Google Scholar
• Urban G. L., Hauser J. R., Roberts J. H. Prelaunch forecasting of new automobiles. Management Sci. (1990) 36(4):401–421Link, Google Scholar
• Zeithammer R., Lenk P. Bayesian estimation of multivariate-normal models when dimensions are absent. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2006) 4(3):241–265Crossref, Google Scholar