Diversification, Diseconomies of Scope, and Vertical Contracting: Evidence from the Taxicab Industry

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1100.1207

References

  • Adams J. S., Berkowitz L. Inequity in social exchange. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (1965) (Academic Press, New York) 267–299CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Argyres N. S., Liebeskind J. P. Contractual commitments, bargaining power, and governance inseparability: Incorporating history into transaction cost theory. Acad. Management Rev. (1999) 24(1):49–63CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Athey S. Product and process flexibility in an innovative environment. RAND J. Econom. (1995) 26(4):557–574CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Baumol W. J. On the proper costs tests for natural monopoly in a multiproduct industry. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1977) 67(5):809–822Google Scholar
  • Bresnahan T., Greenstein S., Henderson R. Schumpeterian competition and diseconomies of scope; illustrations from leading historical firms in computing. (2009) . Working paper, Stanford University, Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  • Capron L., Dussauge P., Mitchell W. Resource redeployment following horizontal acquisitions in Europe and North America. Strategic Management J. (1998) 19(7):631–661CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Capron L., Mitchell W., Swaminathan A. Asset divestiture following horizontal acquisitions: A dynamic view. Strategic Management J. (2001) 22(9):817–844CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coase R. H. The nature of the firm. Economica (1937) 4(16):386–405CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cox G. D. Tackling taxis: First step? National Law J. (1993) 15(47):1–3Google Scholar
  • Eccles R. G.The Transfer Pricing Problem: A Theory for Practice (1985) (Lexington Books, New York) Google Scholar
  • Evans D. S., Heckman J. J. A test for subadditivity of the cost function with an application to the bell system. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1984) 74(4):615–623Google Scholar
  • Fehr E., Schmidt K. M. A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quart. J. Econom. (1999) 114(3):817–868CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Festinger L. A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations (1954) 7(2):117–140CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Forbes S. J., Lederman M. Adaptation and vertical integration in the airline industry. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2009) 99(5):1831–1849CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gibbons R. Four formal(izable) theories of the firm? J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2005) 58(2):200–245CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gilbert G., Cook T. J., Nalevanko A., Everett-Lee L.Transit Cooperative Research Program Report 75: The Role of the Private-for-Hire Vehicle Industry in Public Transit (2002) (National Academy Press, Washington, DC) Google Scholar
  • Holmstrom B. Moral hazard and observability. Bell J. Econom. (1979) 10(1):74–91CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Holmstrom B. Moral hazard in teams. Bell J. Econom. (1982) 13(2):324–340CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Imbens G. Nonparametric estimation of average treatment effects under exogeneity: A review. Rev. Econom. Statist. (2004) 86(1):4–29CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jensen M. C., Meckling W. H. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J. Financial Econom. (1976) 3(4):305–360CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim S. Changes in the nature of urban spatial structure in the United States, 1890–2000. J. Regional Sci. (2007) 47(2):273–287CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kulik C. T., Ambrose M. L. Personal and situtational determinants of referent choice. Acad. Management Rev. (1992) 17(2):212–237CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lang L. H. P., Stulz R. E. Tobin's q, corporate diversification and firm performance. J. Political Econom. (1994) 102(6):1248–1280CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levinthal D., Wu X. Opportunity costs and non-scale free capabilities: Profit maximization, corporate scope, and profit margins. Strategic Management J. (2010) 31(7):780–801CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Luo M. Bids Exceed $300,000 in Medallion Auction. New York Times (2004) April 24):B2Google Scholar
  • Macher J. T., Richman B. D. Transaction cost economics: An assessment of empirical research in the social sciences. Bus. Politics (2008) 10(1):1–63CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milgrom P. Employment contracts, influence activities and efficient organization design. J. Political Econom. (1988) 96(1):42–60CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milgrom P., Roberts J. An economic approach to influence activities in organizations. Amer. J. Sociol. (1988) 94(Supplement):S154–S179CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milgrom P., Roberts J. The economics of modern manufacturing: Technology, strategy and organization. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1990) 80(3):511–28Google Scholar
  • Montgomery C. Corporate diversification. J. Econom. Perspect. (1994) 8(3):163–178CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nickerson J. A., Zenger T. R. Envy, comparison costs, and the economic theory of the firm. Strategic Management J. (2008) 29(13):1429–1450CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Novak S., Stern S. Complementarity among vertical integration decisions: Evidence from automobile product development. Management Sci. (2007) 55(2):311–332LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Penrose E.The Theory of the Growth of the Firm (1959) (John Wiley, New York) Google Scholar
  • Rajan R., Servaes H., Zingales L. The cost of diversity: The diversification discount and inefficient investment. J. Finance (2000) 55(1):35–80CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenbaum P. R., Rubin D. B. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika (1983) 70(1):41–55CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schneider H. Moral hazard in leasing contracts: Evidence from the New York City taxi industry. J. Law Econom. (2010) . ForthcomingCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schoar A. Effects of corporate diversification on productivity. J. Finance (2002) 57(2):2379–2403CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sheahan M., Smith P. Deviance and marginal occupations: The case of taxi drivers. Deviant Behav. (2003) 24(5):449–466CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shin H., Stulz R. Are internal capital markets efficient? Quart. J. Econom. (1998) 113(2):531–552CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Taxicab, Limousine & Paratransit Association (TLPA)Taxicab/ Paratransit Fact Book (1990) (TLPA, Kensington, MD) Google Scholar
  • Teece D. J. Economies of scope and the scope of the enterprise. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1980) 1(3):223–247CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Villalonga B. Diversification discount or premium? New evidence from the business information tracking series. J. Finance (2004) 59(2):479–506CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wernerfelt B., Montgomery C. Tobin's q and the importance of focus in firm performance. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1988) 78(1):246–250Google Scholar
  • Williamson O. E.Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications (1975) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Zhou Y. M. Synergy, coordination costs and diversification choices. Strategic Management J. (2010) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.