Recruiting for Ideas: How Firms Exploit the Prior Inventions of New Hires

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1100.1253

References

  • Agarwal R., Ganco M., Ziedonis R. Reputations for toughness in patent enforcement: Implications for knowledge spillovers via inventor mobility. Strategic Management J. (2009) 30(13):1349–1374CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agarwal R., Echambadi R., Franco A., Sarkar M. B. Knowledge transfer through inheritance: Spin-out generation, development, and survival. Acad. Management J. (2004) 47(4):501–522CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agrawal A., Goldfarb A. Restructuring research: Communication costs and the democratization of university innovation. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2008) 98(4):1578–1590CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agrawal A., Henderson R. Putting patents in context: Exploring knowledge transfer from MIT. Management Sci. (2002) 48(1):44–60LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Agrawal A., Cockburn I., McHale J. Gone but not forgotten: Labor flows, knowledge spillovers, and enduring social capital. J. Econom. Geography (2006) 6(5):571–591CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Agrawal A., Kapur D., McHale J. How do spatial and social proximity influence knowledge flows? Evidence from patent data. J. Urban Econom. (2008) 64(2):258–269CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alcacer J., Gittelman M. Patent citations as a measure of knowledge flows: The influence of examiner citations. Rev. Econom. Statist. (2006) 88(4):774–779CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allison P. D., Waterman R. P.Sociol. Methodology (2002) 32(1):247–265CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Almeida P., Kogut B. The localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Sci. (1999) 45(7):905–917LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Angrist J. D., Krueger A. B. Why do World War II veterans earn more than nonveterans? J. Labor Econom. (1994) 12(1):74–97CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Angrist J. D., Pischke J.Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion (2009) (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arrow K. J., Nelson R. R. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors (1962) 13(Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) 609–625NBER Special Conference SeriesCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Azoulay P., Ding W., Stuart T. The impact of academic patenting on the rate, quality and direction of (public) research output. J. Indust. Econom. (2009) 57(4):637–676CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Azoulay P., Graff Zivin J. S., Wang J. Superstar extinction. Quart. J. Econom. (2010) 125(2):549–589CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barney J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Management (1991) 17(1):99–120CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Becker G. S. Investment in human capital: A theoretical analysis. J. Political Econom. (1962) 70(5):9–49CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Breschi S., Lissoni F. Mobility of skilled workers and co-invention networks: An anatomy of localized knowledge flows. J. Econom. Geography (2009) 9(4):439–468CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chesbrough H.Open Innovation (2003) (Harvard Business School Press, Boston) Google Scholar
  • Coff R. W. Human assets and management dilemmas: Coping with hazards on the road to resource-based theory. Acad. Management Rev. (1997) 22(2):374–402CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cohen W. M., Levinthal D. A. Innovation and learning: The two faces of R&D. Econom. J. (1989) 99(397):569–596Google Scholar
  • Corredoira R. A., Rosenkopf L. Should auld acquaintance be forgot? The reverse transfer of knowledge through mobility ties. Strategic Management J. (2010) 31(2):159–181CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dahl M. S., Sorenson O. The migration of technical workers. J. Urban Econom. (2010) 67(1):33–45CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DiMaggio P., Powell W. W. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Amer. Sociol. Rev. (1983) 48(2):147–160CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dosi G. Sources, procedures and microeconomic effects of innovation. J. Econom. Literature (1988) 26(3):1120–1171Google Scholar
  • Duguet E., MacGarvie M. How well do patent citations measure knowledge spillovers? Evidence from French innovation surveys. Econom. Innovation New Tech. (2005) 14(5):375–393CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fleming L. Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Sci. (2001) 47(1):117–132LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fleming L., King C., Juda A. Small worlds and innovation. Organ. Sci. (2007) 18(6):938–954LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Franco A. M., Mitchell M. F. Covenants not to compete, labor mobility, and industry dynamics. J. Econom. Management Strategy (2008) 17(3):581–606CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Furman J. L., Stern S. Climbing atop the shoulders of giants: The impact of institutions on cumulative research. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2011) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Gompers P., Lerner J., Scharfstein D. Entrepreneurial spawning: Public corporations and the genesis of new ventures, 1986 to 1999. J. Finance (2005) 60(2):517–614CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Groysberg B., Lee L.-E., Nanda A. Can they take it with them? The portability of star knowledge workers' performance. Management Sci. (2008) 54(7):1213–1230LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hall B. H., Mairesse J., Turner L. Identifying age, cohort and period effects in scientific research productivity: Discussion and illustration using simulated and actual data on French physicists. Econom. Innovation New Tech. (2007) 16(2):159–177CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hansen M. T. The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Admin. Sci. Quart. (1999) 44(1):82–111CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heckman J., Navarro-Lozano S. Using matching, instrumental variables, and control functions to estimate economic choice models. Rev. Econom. Statist. (2004) 86(1):30–67CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoisl K. Tracing mobile inventors—The causality between inventor mobility and inventor productivity. Res. Policy (2007) 36(5):619–636CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iacus S. M., King G., Porro G. Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. (2009) . Working paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Imbens G. W. Nonparametric estimation of average treatment effects under exogeneity: A review. Rev. Econom. Statist. (2004) 86(1):4–29CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jaffe A. B., Trajtenberg M.Patents, Citations, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jaffe A. B., Trajtenberg M., Henderson R. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quart. J. Econom. (1993) 108(3):577–598CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jovanovic B. Job matching and the theory of turnover. J. Political Econom. (1979) 87(5):972–990CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klepper S., Sleeper S. Entry by spin-offs. Management Sci. (2005) 51(8):1291–1306LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Lacetera N., Cockburn I. M., Henderson R. M., McGahan A. M., Baum J. A. C. Do firms change capabilities by hiring new people? A study of the adoption of science-based drug discovery. Advances in Strategic Management (2004) 21(JAI Press, Greenwich, CT) 133–159Google Scholar
  • Lampe R. Strategic citation. Rev. Econom. Statist. (2011) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Lazear E. P. Raids and offer matching. Res. Labor Econom. (1986) 8:141–165Google Scholar
  • Levin S. G., Stephan P. E. Research productivity over the life cycle: Evidence for academic scientists. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1991) 81(1):114–132Google Scholar
  • Llorente G., Michaely R., Saar G., Wang J. Dynamic volume-return relation of individual stocks. Rev. Financial Stud. (2002) 15(4):1005–1047CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Malamud O., Pop-Eleches C. General education versus vocational training: Evidence from an economy in transition. Rev. Econom. Statist. (2010) 92(1):43–60CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • March J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):71–87LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Marx M., Strumsky D., Fleming L. Mobility, skills, and the Michigan non-compete experiment. Management Sci. (2009) 55(6):875–889LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Mehta A., Rysman M., Simcoe T. Identifying the age profile of patent citations: New estimates of knowledge diffusion. J. Appl. Econometrics (2009) . ePub ahead of print September 1, http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jae.1086/abstractGoogle Scholar
  • Moen J. Is mobility of technical personnel a source of R&D spillovers? J. Labor Econom. (2005) 23(1):81–114CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moffitt R. A. Introduction to the symposium on the econometrics of matching. Rev. Econom. Statist. (2004) 86(1):1–3CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Murray F., Stern S. Do formal intellectual property rights hinder the free flow of scientific knowledge? An empirical test of the anti-commons hypothesis. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2007) 63(4):648–687CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson R. R., Winter S. G. An evolutionary theory of economic change. (1982) . Belknap, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  • Oettl A. Productivity and helpfulness: A new taxonomy for star scientists. (2009) . Working paper, Georgia Institute of Technology, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  • Oettl A., Agrawal A. International labor mobility and knowledge flow externalities. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (2008) 39:1242–1260CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Penrose E. T.The Theory of the Growth of the Firm (1959) (Blackwell, Oxford, UK) Google Scholar
  • Peteraf M. A. The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management J. (1993) 14(3):179–191CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosenkopf L., Almeida P. Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility. Management Sci. (2003) 49(6):0751–0766LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rysman M., Simcoe T. Patents and the performance of voluntary standard-setting organizations. Management Sci. (2008) 54(11):1920–1934LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Samila S., Sorenson O. Non-compete covenants: Incentives to innovate or impediments to growth. Management Sci. (2011) . ForthcomingGoogle Scholar
  • Saxenian A. L.Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 (1994) (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Simon C. J., Warner J. Matchmaker, matchmaker: The effect of old boy networks on job match quality, earnings, and tenure. J. Labor Econom. (1992) 10(3):306–330CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simon H. A. Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organ. Sci. (1991) 2(1):125–134LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Singh J. Collaborative networks as determinants of knowledge diffusion patterns. Management Sci. (2005) 51(5):756–770LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Singh J. Asymmetry of knowledge spillovers between MNCs and host country firms. J. Internat. Bus. Stud. (2007) 38(5):764–786CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Singh J. Distributed R&D, cross-regional knowledge integration and quality of innovative output. Res. Policy (2008) 37(1):77–96CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Singh J., Fleming L. Lone inventors as sources of breakthroughs: Myth or reality? Management Sci. (2010) 56(1):41–56LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Singh J., Hansen M. T., Podolny J. M. The world is not small for everyone: Inequity in searching for knowledge in organizations. Management Sci. (2010) 56(9):1415–1438LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Song J., Almeida P., Wu G. Learning by hiring: When is mobility more likely to facilitate interfirm knowledge transfer? Management Sci. (2003) 49(4):351–365LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Thompson P., Fox-Kean M. Patent citations and the geography of knowledge spillovers: A reassessment. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2005) 95(1):450–460CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Trajtenberg M. The “names game”: Harnessing inventors' patent data for economic research. (2006) . NBER Working Paper 12479, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MACrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tzabbar D., Silverman B. S., Aharonson B. S. Learning by hiring or hiring to avoid learning? Organizational exploration via individuals' exploitation. (2009) . Working paper, University of Central Florida, OrlandoGoogle Scholar
  • Weitzman M. Recombinant growth. Quart. J. Econom. (1998) 113(2):331–360CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wooldridge J. M. Distribution-free estimation of some nonlinear panel data models. J. Econometrics (1999) 90(1):77–97CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.