The Threat from Within: Account Managers' Concern About Opportunism by Their Own Team Members

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1100.1298

References

  • Achrol R. S., Gundlach G. T. Legal and social safeguards against opportunism in exchange. J. Retailing (1999) 75(1):107–124CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson E. The salesperson as outside agent or employee: A transaction cost analysis. Marketing Sci. (1985) 4(3):234–254LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson E. Transaction costs as determinants of opportunism in integrated and independent sales forces. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (1988) 9(3):247–264CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson E., Weitz B. Determinants of continuity in conventional industrial channel dyads. Marketing Sci. (1989) 8(4):310–323LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson E., Weitz B. The use of pledges to build and sustain commitment in distribution channels. J. Marketing Res. (1992) 29(1):18–34CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arkes H. R., Hutzel L. The role of probability of success estimates in the sunk cost effect. J. Behav. Decision Making (2000) 13(3):295–306CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Axelrod R.The Evolution of Cooperation (1984) (Basic Books, New York) Google Scholar
  • Baker G., Gibbons R., Murphy K. J. Subjective performance measures in optimal incentive contracts. Quart. J. Econom. (1994) 109(4):1125–1156CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Becerra M., Gupta A. K. Perceived trustworthiness within the organization: The moderating impact of communication frequency on trustor and trustee effects. Organ. Sci. (2003) 14(1):32–44LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bell B. S., Kozlowski S. W. J. Active learning: Effects of core training design elements on self-regulatory processes, learning, and adaptability. J. Appl. Psych. (2008) 93(2):296–316CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bensaou M., Anderson E. Buyer-supplier relations in industrial markets: When do buyers risk making idiosyncratic investments? Organ. Sci. (1999) 10(4):460–481LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Brown J. R., Dev C. S., Lee D.-J. Managing marketing channel opportunism: The efficacy of alternative governance mechanisms. J. Marketing (2000) 64(2):51–65CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cummings J. N. Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Sci. (2004) 50(3):352–364LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Dutta S., Bergen M., Heide J. B., John G. Understanding dual distribution: The case of reps and house accounts. J. Law, Econom., Organ. (1995) 11(1):189–204Google Scholar
  • Eccles R. G., White H. C. Price and authority in inter-profit center transactions. Amer. J. Sociol. (1988) 94(Supplement):S17–S51CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M. Agency theory: An assessment and review. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14(1):57–74CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Festinger L.A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (1957) (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fisher C. D. Transmission of positive and negative feedback to subordinates: A laboratory investigation. J. Appl. Psych. (1979) 64(5):533–540CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fornell C., Larcker D. F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Marketing Res. (1981) 18(1):39–50CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Galunic D. C., Anderson E. From security to mobility: Generalized investments in human capital and agent commitment. Organ. Sci. (2000) 11(1):1–20LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gerbing D. W., Anderson J. C. An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. J. Marketing Res. (1988) 25(2):186–192CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Geyskens I., Steenkamp J.-B. E. M., Kumar N. Make, buy, or allay: A transaction cost theory meta-analysis. Acad. Management J. (2006) 49(3):519–543CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ghosh M., John G. Governance value analysis and marketing strategy. J. Marketing (1999) 63(4):131–145CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ghosh M., John G. Strategic fit in industrial alliances: An empirical test of governance value analysis. J. Marketing Res. (2005) 42(3):346–357CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ghoshal S., Moran P. Bad for practice: A critique of the transaction cost theory. Acad. Management Rev. (1996) 21(1):13–47CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gibbons R. Incentives in organizations. J. Econom. Perspect. (1998) 12(4):115–132CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heide J. B., John G. The role of dependence balancing in safeguarding transaction-specific assets in conventional channels. J. Marketing (1988) 52(1):20–35CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heide J. B., John G. Alliances in industrial purchasing: The determinants of joint action in buyer-supplier relationships. J. Marketing Res. (1990) 27(1):24–36CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heide J. B., John G. Do norms matter in marketing relationships? J. Marketing (1992) 56(2):32–44CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heide J. B., Miner A. S. The shadow of the future: Effects of anticipated interaction and frequency of contact on buyer-seller cooperation. Acad. Management J. (1992) 35(2):265–291CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Homburg C., Workman J. P., Jensen O. A configurational perspective on key account management. J. Marketing (2002) 66(2):38–60CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Huber G. P., Power D. J. Retrospective reports of strategic-level managers: Guidelines for increasing their accuracy. Strategic Management J. (1985) 6(2):171–180CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hult G. T. M., Ketchen D. J., Arrfelt M. Strategic supply chain management: Improving performance through a culture of competitiveness and knowledge development. Strategic Management J. (2007) 28(10):1035–1052CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hwang P. Asset specificity and the fear of exploitation. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. (2006) 60(3):423–438CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jap S. D. Pie-expansion efforts: Collaboration processes in buyer-supplier relationships. J. Marketing Res. (1999) 36(4):461–475CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jap S. D., Anderson E. Safeguarding interorganizational performance and continuity under ex post opportunism. Management Sci. (2003) 49(12):1684–1701LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jap S. D., Ganesan S. Control mechanisms and the relationship life cycle: Implications for safeguarding specific investments and developing commitment. J. Marketing Res. (2000) 37(2):227–245CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • John G. An empirical investigation of some antecedents of opportunism in a marketing channel. J. Marketing Res. (1984) 21(3):278–289CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jöreskog K. G., Sörbom D.LISREL 8: User's Reference Guide (1996) (Scientific Software International, Chicago) Google Scholar
  • Kidwell R. E., Bennett N. Employee propensity to withhold effort: A conceptual model to intersect three avenues of research. Acad. Management Rev. (1993) 18(3):429–456CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kivlighan D. M. Feedback in group psychotherapy review and implications. Small Group Res. (1985) 16(3):373–385CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Klein B., Crawford R. A., Alchian A. A. Vertical integration, appropriable rents, and the competitive contracting process. J. Law, Econom. (1978) 21(2):297–326CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kohli A. K. Determinants of influence in organizational buying: A contingency approach. J. Marketing (1989) 53(3):50–65CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Larson J. R. The performance feedback process: A preliminary model. Organ. Behav. Human Performance (1984) 33(1):42–76CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Larson J. R. The dynamic interplay between employees' feedback-seeking strategies and supervisors' delivery of performance feedback. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14(3):408–422CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lepine J., Van Dyne L. Peer responses to low performers: An attributional model of helping in the context of groups. Acad. Management Rev. (2001) 26(1):67–84CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Loewenstein G. F., Weber E. U., Hsee C. K., Welch N. Risk as feelings. Psych. Bull. (2001) 127(2):267–286CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lusch R. F., Brown J. R. Interdependency, contracting, and relational behavior in marketing channels. J. Marketing (1996) 60(4):19–38CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McKee T. L. E., Ptacek J. T. I'm afraid I have something bad to tell you: Breaking bad news from the perspective of the giver. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. (2001) 31(2):246–273CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mesquita L. F., Lazzarini S. G. Horizontal and vertical relationships in developing economies: Implications for SME's access to global markets. Acad. Management J. (2008) 51(2):359–380CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milgrom P., Roberts J. An economic approach to influence activities in organizations. Amer. J. Sociol. (1988) 94(Supplement):S154–S179CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morgan N. A., Vorhies D. W., Mason C. H. Market orientation, marketing capabilities, and firm performance. Strategic Management J. (2009) 30(8):909–920CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morran D. K., Stockton R., Bond L. Delivery of positive and corrective feedback in counseling groups. J. Counseling Psych. (1991) 38(4):410–414CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morrison E. W., Milliken F. J. Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world. Acad. Management Rev. (2000) 25(4):706–725CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moschandreas M. The role of opportunism in transaction cost economics. J. Econom. Issues (1997) 31(1):39–57CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Noordewier T. G., John G., Nevin J. R. Performance outcomes of purchasing arrangements in industrial buyer-vendor relationships. J. Marketing (1990) 54(4):80–93CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nunnally J. C.Psychometric Theory (1978) (McGraw-Hill, New York) Google Scholar
  • Nygaard A., Dahlstrom R. Role stress and effectiveness in horizontal alliances. J. Marketing (2002) 66(2):61–82CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Parkhe A. Strategic alliance structuring: A game theoretic and transaction cost examination of interfirm cooperation. Acad. Management J. (1993) 36(4):794–829CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ping R. A. A parsimonious estimating technique for interaction and quadratic latent variables. J. Marketing Res. (1995) 32(3):336–347CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ping R. A. Interpreting latent variable interactions. Amer. Marketing Assoc. Winter Educators' Conf. Proc. (2002) (American Marketing Association, Chicago) Google Scholar
  • Podsakoff P. M., Mackenzie S. B., Lee J.-Y., Podsakoff N. P. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88(5):879–903CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reagans R., Zuckerman E., Mcevily B. How to make the team: Social networks vs. demography as criteria for designing effective teams. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2004) 49(1):101–133CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rindfleisch A., Heide J. B. Transaction cost analysis: Past, present, and future applications. J. Marketing (1997) 61(4):30–54CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Robson M. J., Katsikeas C. S., Bello D. C. Drivers and performance outcomes of trust in international strategic alliances: The role of organizational complexity. Organ. Sci. (2008) 19(4):647–665LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Rokkan A. I., Heide J. B., Wathne K. H. Specific investments in marketing relationships: Expropriation and bonding effects. J. Marketing Res. (2003) 40(2):210–224CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rosen S., Tesser A. On reluctance to communicate undesirable information: The MUM effect. Sociometry (1970) 33(3):253–263CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schilling M. A., Steensma H. K. Disentangling the theories of firm boundaries: A path model and empirical test. Organ. Sci. (2002) 13(4):387–401LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sethi R. New product quality and product development teams. J. Marketing (2000) 64(2):1–14CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sethi R., Smith D. C., Whan Park C. Cross-functional product development teams, creativity, and the innovativeness of new consumer products. J. Marketing Res. (2001) 38(1):73–85CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stump R. L., Heide J. B. Controlling supplier opportunism in industrial relationships. J. Marketing Res. (1996) 33(4):431–441CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sunstein C. R. Probability neglect: Emotions, worst cases, and law. Yale Law J. (2002) 112(1):61–107CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sunstein C. R. Terrorism and probability neglect. J. Risk Uncertainty (2003) 26(2/3):121–136CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tesser A., Rosen S., Batchelor T. R. On the reluctance to communicate bad news (the MUM Effect): A role play extension. J. Personality (1972) 40(1):88–103CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Vázquez X. H. Allocating decision rights on the shop floor: A perspective from transaction cost economics and organization theory. Organ. Sci. (2004) 15(4):463–480LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Wathne K. H., Heide J. B. Opportunism in interfirm relationships: Forms, outcomes, and solutions. J. Marketing (2000) 64(4):36–51CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weenig M. W. H., Groenenboom A. C. W. J., Wilke H. A. M. Bad news transmission as a function of the definitiveness of consequences and the relationship between communicator and recipient. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2001) 80(3):449–461CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weiss A. M., Kurland N. Holding distribution channel relationships together: The role of transaction-specific assets and length of prior relationship. Organ. Sci. (1997) 8(6):612–623LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Weitz B. A., Bradford K. D. Personal selling and sales management: A relationship marketing perspective. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (1999) 27(2):241–254CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson O. E.Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications (1975) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Williamson O. E. Transaction-cost economics: The governance of contractual relations. J. Law Econom. (1979) 22(2):233–263CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Williamson O. E. Assessing contract. J. Law, Econom., Organ. (1985a) 1(1):177–208Google Scholar
  • Williamson O. E.The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (1985b) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
  • Wuyts S., Geyskens I. The formation of buyer-supplier relationships: Detailed contract drafting and close partner selection. J. Marketing (2005) 69(4):103–117CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.