An Empirical Analysis of User Content Generation and Usage Behavior on the Mobile Internet

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1350

References

  • Albuquerque P., Pavlidis P., Chatow U., Chen K., Jamal Z., Koh K. Evaluating promotional activities in an online two-sided market for user-generated content. (2010) . Working paper, University of Rochester, Rochester, NYCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aral S., Muchnik L., Sundararajan A. Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks. Proc. National Acad. Sci. USA (2009) 106(51):21544–21549CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Arellano M. Computing robust standard errors for within-groups estimators. Oxford Bull. Econom. Statist. (1987) 49(4):431–434CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Banerjee S., Dholakia R. R. Does location based advertising work? Internat. J. Mobile Marketing (2008) 3(2):68–74Google Scholar
  • Baum C. F. CHECKREG3: Stata module to check identification status of simultaneous equations system. (2007) . Statistical Software Components, Department of Economics, Boston College, Boston. http://econpapers.repec.org/software/bocbocode/s456877.htmGoogle Scholar
  • Baye M., Rupert J., Gatti J., Kattuman P., Morgan J. Clicks, discontinuities, and firm demand online. J. Econom. Management Strategy (2009) 18(4):935–975CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Becker G. S. A theory of the allocation of time. Econom. J. (1965) 75(299):493–517Google Scholar
  • Biørn E. Regression systems for unbalanced panel data: A stepwise maximum likelihood procedure. J. Econom. (2004) 122(2):281–291CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dasgupta K., Singh R., Viswanathan B., Chakraborty D., Mukherjea S., Nanavati A., Joshi A. Social ties and their relevance to churn in mobile telecom networks. EDBT'08 Proc. 11th Internat. Conf. Extending Database Tech. (2008) (ACM, New York) 668–677CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dekimpe M. G., Hanssens D. M. The persistence of marketing effects on sales. Marketing Sci. (1995) 14(1):1–21LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Economist, The The mobile data challenge: A report from the Economist Intelligence Unit. (2010) . http://graphics.eiu.com/upload/eb/Innopath_MobileData_WEB.pdfGoogle Scholar
  • Ghose A., Han S. P. A dynamic structural model of user learning on the mobile Internet. (2009) . Working paper, New York University, New York. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1485049Google Scholar
  • Ghose A., Goldfarb A., Han S. How is the mobile Internet different? Search costs and local activities. (2011) . Working paper, New York University, New York. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1732759Google Scholar
  • Greene W. Fixed and random effects models for count data. (2007) . Working Paper NYU EC-07-16, Stern School of Business, New York University, New YorkCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hartmann W. R., Manchanda P., Nair H., Bothner M., Dodds P., Godes D., Hosanagar K., Tucker C. Modeling social interactions: Identification, empirical methods and policy implications. Marketing Lett. (2008) 19(3):287–304CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Heckman J. J. Sample selection bias a specification error. Econometrica (1979) 47(1):153–161CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hill S., Provost F., Volinsky C. Network-based marketing: Identifying likely adopters via consumer networks. Statist. Sci. (2006) 21(2):256–276CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Homans G. C. Social behavior as exchange. Amer. J. Sociol. (1958) 63(6):597–606CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iyengar R., Van den Bulte C., Valente T. W. Opinion leadership and social contagion in new product diffusion. Marketing Sci. (2011) 30(2):195–212LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Jacoby J., Szybillo G. J., Berning C. K. Time and consumer behavior: An interdisciplinary overview. J. Consumer Res. (1976) 2(1):320–339CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lahiri K., Schmidt P. On the estimation of triangular structural systems. Econometrica (1978) 46(5):1217–1221CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lancaster T. The incidental parameters problem since 1948. J. Econometrics (2000) 95(2):391–414CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Manski C. Identification of endogenous social effects. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1993) 60(3):531–542CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mundlak Y. On the pooling of time series and cross section data. Econometrica (1978) 46(1):69–85CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nair H. S., Manchanda P., Bhatia T. Asymmetric social interactions in physician prescription behavior: The role of opinion leaders. J. Marketing Res. (2010) 47(5):883–895CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nam S., Manchanda P., Chintagunta P. K. The effect of signal quality and contiguous word of mouth on customer acquisition for a video-on-demand service. Marketing Sci. (2010) 29(4):690–700LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Nerlove M. Experimental evidence on the estimation of dynamic economic relations from a time series of cross sections. Econom. Stud. Quart. (1967) 18(3):42–74Google Scholar
  • Nickell S. Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica (1981) 49(6):1417–1426CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oestreicher-Singer G., Sundararajan A. The visible hand? Demand effects of recommendation networks in electronic markets. (2010) . Working paper, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, IsraelGoogle Scholar
  • O'Hara K., Mitchell A., Vorbau A. Consuming video on mobile devices. Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors Comput. Systems (2007) (ACM, New York) 857–866CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Osborne M. Consumer learning, switching costs, and heterogeneity: A structural examination. (2007) . EAG Discussions paper 200710, Antitrust Division, Department of Justice, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  • Puhani P. The heckman correction for sample selection and its critique. J. Econom. Surveys (2000) 14(1):53–68CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rethink Wireless AT&T will use new device formats to introduce usage-based pricing. (2010) . Accessed November 1, http://www.rethink-wireless.com/article.asp?article_id=2722Google Scholar
  • Shim J. P., Park S., Shim J. M. Mobile TV phone: current usage, issues, and strategic implications. Indust. Management and Data Systems (2008) 108(9):1269–1282CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stewart M. B. Maximum simulated likelihood estimation of random—Effects dynamic probit models with autocorrelated errors. Stata J. (2006) 6(2):256–272CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stewart M. B. The interrelated dynamics of unemployment and low-wage employment. J. Appl. Econometrics (2007) 22(3):511–531CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stoeckl R., Rohrmeier P., Hess T. Motivations to produce user generated content: Differences between webloggers and video bloggers. BLED 2007 Proc. (2007) . Paper 30, http://aisel.aisnet.org/bled2007/30Google Scholar
  • Susarla A., Oh J.-H., Tan Y. Social networks and the diffusion of user-generated content: Evidence from YouTube. Inform. Systems Res. (2011) . ePub ahead of print April 8, http://is.journal.informs.org/cgi/content/abstract/isre.1100.0339v1Google Scholar
  • Trusov M., Bodapati A. V., Bucklin R. E. Determining influential users in Internet social networks. J. Marketing Res. (2010) 47(4):643–658CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tucker C. Identifying formal and informal influence in technology adoption with network externalities. Management Sci. (2008) 54(12):2024–2038LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Vanhonacker W. R., Mahajan V., Bronnenberg B. J. The emergence of market structure in new repeat-purchase categories: The interplay of market share and retailer distribution. J. Marketing Res. (2000) 37(1):16–31CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Verbeek M. On the estimation of a fixed effects model with selectivity bias. Econom. Lett. (1990) 34(3):267–270CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Verbeek M., Nijman T., Mátyás L., Sevestre P. Incomplete panels and selection bias. The Econometrics of Panel Data: A Handbook of the Theory with Applications (1996) (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands) 449–490CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wooldridge J. M.Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data (2002) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
  • Xia M., Huang Y., Duan W., Whinston A. B. To continue sharing or not to continue sharing? An empirical analysis of user decision in peer-to-peer sharing networks. Inform. Systems Res. (2011) . ePub ahead of print April 8, http://isr.journal.informs.org/cgi/content/abstract/isre.1100.0344v1Google Scholar
  • Zabel J. E. Estimating fixed and random effects models with selectivity. Econom. Lett. (1992) 40(3):269–272CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.