Pooling, Access, and Countervailing Power in Channel Governance

References

• Alchian A. A. Uncertainty, evolution and economic theory. J. Political Econom. (1950) 58(3):211–221Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson E., Coughlan A. T., Weitz B. A., Wensley R. Channel management: Structure, governance, and relationship management. Handbook of Marketing (2002) (Sage, London) 223–247Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bajari P., Tadelis S. Incentives versus transaction costs: A theory of procurement contracts. RAND J. Econom. (2001) 32(3):387–407Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balasubramanian S. Mail versus mall: A strategic analysis of competition between direct marketers and conventional retailers. Marketing Sci. (1998) 17(3):181–195Link, Google Scholar
• Bijman W. J. J. Essays on agricultural co-operatives; governance structure in fruit and vegetable markets. (2002) . Ph.D. thesis, Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
• Bijman W. J. J., Hendrikse G. W. J. Co-operatives in chains: Institutional restructuring in the dutch fruit and vegetable industry. J. Chain Network Sci. (2003) 3(2):95–107Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bolton P., Dewatripont M.Contract Theory (2005) (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Bolton P., Whinston M. D. Incomplete contracts, vertical integration, and supply assurance. Rev. Econom. Stud. (1993) 60(1):121–148Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chiang W. K., Chhajed D., Hess J. D. Direct marketing, indirect profits: A strategic analysis of dual-channel supply-chain design. Management Sci. (2003) 49(1):1–20Link, Google Scholar
• Coase R. H. The nature of the firm. Economica (1937) 4(16):386–405Crossref, Google Scholar
• Commission of the European Communities Co-operatives in enterprise Europe. (2001) . Commission of the European Communities, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
• Cook M. L. The future of U.S. agricultural cooperatives: A neo-institutional approach. Amer. J. Agricultural Econom. (1995) 77(5):1153–1159Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cook M. L., Iliopoulos C. Beginning to inform the theory of the cooperative firm: Emergence of the new generation cooperative. Finnish J. Bus. Econom. (1999) 4:525–535Google Scholar
• Coughlan A. T., Wernerfelt B. On credible delegation by oligopolists: A discussion of distribution channel management. Management Sci. (1989) 35(2):226–239Link, Google Scholar
• Dunn J. R. Basic cooperative principles and their relationship to selected practices. J. Agricultural Cooperation (1988) 3:83–93Google Scholar
• Galbraith J. K.American Capitalism: The Concept of Countervailing Power (1952) (Houghton-Mifflin, Boston) Google Scholar
• Grossman S. J., Hart O. D. The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration. J. Political Econom. (1986) 94(4):691–719Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansen G. S., Wernerfelt B. Determinants of firm performance: The relative importance of economic and organizational factors. Strategic Management J. (1989) 10(5):399–411Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hansmann H.The Ownership of Enterprise (1996) (The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA) Google Scholar
• Hart O. D., Moore J. Property rights and the nature of the firm. J. Political Econom. (1990) 98(6):1119–1158Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hendrikse G. W. J. On the coexistence of spot and contract markets: A delivery requirement explanation. Eur. Rev. Agricultural Econom. (2007) 34(2):137–162Google Scholar
• Hendrikse G. W. J., Veerman C. P. Marketing co-operatives: An incomplete contracting perspective. J. Agricultural Econom. (2001) 52(1):53–64Crossref, Google Scholar
• Holmström B. R., Milgrom P. The firm as an incentive system. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1994) 84(4):972–991Google Scholar
• Joskow P. L. The role of transaction cost economics in antitrust and public utility regulatory policies. J. Law, Econom., Organ. (1991) 7(special issue):53–83Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klein B., Crawford R. A., Alchian A. A. Vertical integration, appropriable rents, and the competitive contracting process. J. Law Econom. (1978) 21(2):297–326Crossref, Google Scholar
• Liu Y., Zhang Z. J. The benefits of personalized pricing in a channel. Marketing Sci. (2006) 25(1):97–105Link, Google Scholar
• Makadok R., Coff R. Both markets and hierarchy: An incentive-system theory of hybrid governance forms. Acad. Management Rev. (2009) 34(2):297–319Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nilsson J. The emergence of new organizational models for agricultural cooperatives. Swedish J. Agricultural Sci. (1998) 28(1):39–47Google Scholar
• Nourse E. G. The economic philosophy of cooperation. Amer. Econom. Rev. (1922) 12(4):577–597Google Scholar
• Perry M. K., Schmalensee R., Willig R. D. Vertical integration: Determinants and effects. Handbook of Industrial Organization (1989) (North Holland, Amsterdam) 183–255Crossref, Google Scholar
• Purohit D. Dual distribution channels: The competition between rental agencies and dealers. Marketing Sci. (1997) 16(3):228–245Link, Google Scholar
• Reardon T., Timmer C. P., Berdegue J. The rapid rise of supermarkets in developing countries: Induced organizational, institutional, and technological change in agrifood systems. Electronic J. Agricultural Development Econom. (2004) 1(2):168–183Google Scholar
• Shapley L., Kuhn H., Tucker A. W. A value for n-person games. Contributions to the Theory of Games (1953) II(Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ) 307–317Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutton J. Explaining everything, explaining nothing? Game theoretic models in industrial economics. Eur. Econom. Rev. (1990) 34(2–3):505–512Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt B. An efficiency criterion for marketing design. J. Marketing Res. (1994) 31(4):462–470Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williamson O. E.The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (1985) (Free Press, New York) Google Scholar
• Zettelmeyer F. Expanding to the internet: Pricing and communications strategies when firms compete on multiple channels. J. Marketing Res. (2000) 37(3):292–308Crossref, Google Scholar