Newspaper Reports and Consumer Choice: Evidence from the Do Not Call Registry
Published Online:25 Jul 2011https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1392
References
- consumer response to negative publicity: The moderating role of commitment. J. Marketing Res. (2000) 37(2):203–214Crossref, Google Scholar
- The impact of newspapers on consumer confidence: Does spin bias exist? Appl. Econom. (2008) 40(5):531–539Crossref, Google Scholar
- Bacon's InformationBacon's Newspaper Directory 2005 (2004) 53rd ed.(Bacon's Information, Chicago) Google Scholar
- Learning from the behavior of others: Conformity, fads, and informational cascades. J. Econom. Perspect. (1998) 12(3):151–170Crossref, Google Scholar
- Reviewing the reviewers: The impact of individual film critics on box office performance. Quant. Marketing Econom. (2006) 5(4):401–425Crossref, Google Scholar
- Media coverage and charitable giving after the 2004 tsunami. Southern Econom. J. (2008) 75(1):9–25Google Scholar
- Observational learning: Evidence from a randomized natural field experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. (2009) 99(3):864–882Crossref, Google Scholar
- The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. J. Marketing Res. (2006) 43(3):345–354Crossref, Google Scholar
- The effects of online user reviews on movie box office performance: Accounting for sequential rollout and aggregation across local markets. Marketing Sci. (2010) 29(5):944–957Link, Google Scholar
- The Fox News effect: Media bias and voting. Quart. J. Econom. (2007) 122(3):1187–1234Crossref, Google Scholar
- Editor & PublisherEditor & Publisher International Yearbook 2004 (2004) 84th ed.(Editor & Publisher, New York) . Part 1Google Scholar
- Television and voter turnout. Quart. J. Econom. (2006) 121(3):931–972Crossref, Google Scholar
- Media bias and reputation. J. Political Econom. (2006) 114(2):280–316Crossref, Google Scholar
- Competition and truth in the market for news. J. Econom. Perspect. (2008) 22(2):133–154Crossref, Google Scholar
- Does the media matter? A field experiment measuring the effect of newspapers on voting behavior and political opinions. Amer. Econom. J.: Appl. Econom. (2009) 1(2):35–52Crossref, Google Scholar
- Using online conversations to study word-of-mouth communication. Marketing Sci. (2004) 23(4):545–560Link, Google Scholar
- Firm-created word-of-mouth communication: Evidence from a field test. Marketing Sci. (2009) 28(4):721–739Link, Google Scholar
- Seasonality of moves and duration of residence. (1998) . Current Population Reports, Household Economic Studies, Report P70-66, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Panel data and unobservable individual effects. Econometrica (1981) 49(6):1377–1398Crossref, Google Scholar
- , Radach R., Hyona J., Deubel H. Reading or scanning? A study of newspaper and net paper reading. The Mind's Eye: Cognitive and Applied Aspects of Eye Movement Research (2003) (North Holland, Amsterdam) 657–670Chap. 30Crossref, Google Scholar
- Media coverage of biotech foods and influence on consumer choice. Amer. J. Agricultural Econom. (2004) 86(5):1238–1246Crossref, Google Scholar
- Word of mouth for movies: Its dynamics and impact on box office revenue. J. Marketing. (2006) 70(3):74–89Crossref, Google Scholar
- Pew Research Center Principles of journalism. (2009) . Project for Excellence in Journalism. Accessed January 19, 2010, http://www.journalism.org/resources/principles/Google Scholar
- Do newspapers matter? Evidence from the closure of the Cincinnati Post. (2009) . NBER Working Paper 14817, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
- Lessons from an “oops” at Consumer Reports: Consumers follow experts and ignore invalid information. J. Marketing Res. (2011) 48(1):1–12Crossref, Google Scholar
- Representing PR in the marketing mix: A study on public relations variables in marketing mix modeling. (2008) . Institute for Public Relations. Accessed January 20, 2010, http://www.instituteforpr.org/wp-content/uploads/BG_SmithKetchum1.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Radio's impact on public spending. Quart. J. Econom. (2004) 119(1):189–221Crossref, Google Scholar
- TNS Media Intelligence TNS Media Intelligence Reports U.S. advertising expenditures declined 4.1 percent in 2008. (2009) . Accessed January 20, 2010, http://www.tnsglobal.com/news/news-DFBC6A29065248558906AEDEF9D8397C.aspxGoogle Scholar
- U.S. Federal Trade Commission National Do Not Call Registry—Total registrations as of September 16. (2003a) . Accessed January 25, 2010, http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2003/09/030917dncstates.pdfGoogle Scholar
- U.S. Federal Trade Commission The status of the National Do Not Call Registry. (2003b) . Prepared statement before the Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, U.S. Senate, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- U.S. Federal Trade Commission Annual report to congress for FY2003 and 2004 pursuant to the Do Not Call Implementation Act on implementation of the National Do Not Call Registry. (2005) . Accessed January 25, 2010, http://www.ftc.gov/reports/donotcall/051004dncfy0304.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Who signed up for the do-not-call list? (2004) . Report 2009-034, School of Information, University of California, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
- The demographics of the do-not-call list. IEEE Security Privacy (2005) 3(1):34–39Crossref, Google Scholar
- No-call law will keep sell-phoners on hold. New York Post (2003) June 27). http://www.nypost.com/p/news/item_UgqWW93M7g6vPYju5pMSaJGoogle Scholar
- Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach (2006) 3rd ed.(Thomson Southwestern, Mason, OH) Google Scholar
- News consumption and media bias. Marketing Sci. (2007) 26(5):611–628Link, Google Scholar
- The sound of silence: Observational learning in the U.S. kidney market. Marketing Sci. (2010) 29(2):315–335Link, Google Scholar

