Corporate Social Responsibility and Competitive Advantage: Overcoming the Trust Barrier

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1403

References

  • Agustin C., Singh J. Curvilinear effects of consumer loyalty determinants in relational exchanges. J. Marketing Res. (2005) 42(1):96–108CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ahluwalia R. Examination of psychological processes underlying resistance to persuation. J. Consumer Res. (2000) 27(2):217–232CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ahluwalia R., Burnkrant R. E., Unnava H. R. Consumer response to negative publicity: The moderating role of commitment. J. Marketing Res. (2000) 37(2):203–214CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Aiken L. S., West S. G.Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions (1991) (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA) Google Scholar
  • Alsop R. J. Communicating corporate citizenship. Leading Perspectives by Bus. Soc. Responsibility (2005) Summer):4–5Google Scholar
  • Bergkvist L., Rossiter J. R. The predictive validity of multiple-item versus single-item measures of the same constructs. J. Marketing Res. (2007) 44(2):175–184CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bhattacharya C. B., Sen S. Consumer-company identification: A framework for understanding consumers relationships with companies. J. Marketing (2003) 67(2):76–88CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bowman D., Gatignon H. Order of entry as a moderator of the effect of the marketing mix on market share. Marketing Sci. (1996) 15(3):222–242LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Cacioppo J. T., Petty R. E., Feinstein J. A., Jarvis W. B. G. Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psych. Bull. (1996) 119(2):197–253CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Center for Disease Control and Prevention Children's oral health. (2009) . Accessed July 18, http://www.cdc.gov/OralHealth/publications/factsheets/sgr2000_fs3.htmGoogle Scholar
  • Chua R. Y. J., Ingram P., Morris M. W. From the head and the heart: Locating cognition- and affect-based trust in managers professional networks. Acad. Management J. (2008) 51(3):436–452CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cone C., Darigan K. Cause branding picks up on a new issue for women and girls. (2010) . Accessed August 16, http://www.contributemedia.com/opinions_details.php?id=182Google Scholar
  • Cottrell C. A., Neuberg S. L., Li N. P. What do people desire in others? A sociofunctional perspective on the importance of different valued characteristics. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (2007) 92(2):208–231CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis I. What is the business of business. McKinsey Quart. (2005) 3(2):104–113Google Scholar
  • Deighton J., Romer D., McQueen J. Using drama to persuade. J. Consumer Res. (1989) 16(3):335–343CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Doney P. M., Cannon J. P. An examination of the nature of trust in buyer-seller relationships. J. Marketing (1997) 61(2):35–61CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Du S., Bhattacharya C. B., Sen S. Reaping relational rewards from corporate social responsibility: The role of competitive positioning. Internat. J. Res. Marketing (2007) 24(3):224–241CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Du S., Sen S., Bhattacharya C. B. Exploring the social and business returns of a corporate oral health initiative aimed at disadvantaged hispanic families. J. Consumer Res. (2008) 35(3):483–494CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eagly A. H., Chaiken S., Richard E., Petty A., Krosnick J. Attitude strength, attitude structure, and resistance to change. Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences (1995) 4(Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ) 413–432Google Scholar
  • Eisenhardt K. M. Building theory from case study research. Acad. Management Rev. (1989) 14(4):532–550CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ellen P. S., Webb D. J., Mohr L. A. Building corporate associations: Consumer attributions for corporate socially responsible programs. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (2006) 34(2):147–157CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Escalas J. E. Narrative processing: Building consumer connections to brands. J. Consumer Psych. (2004) 14(1/2):168–180CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fazio R. H., Zanna M. P., Berkowitz L. Direct experience and attitude-behavior consistency. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (1981) 14(Academic Press, New York) 161–202Google Scholar
  • Fisher-Owens S. A., Barker J. C., Adams S., Chung L. H., Gansky S. A., Hyde S., Weintraub J. A. Giving policy some teeth: Routes to reducing disparities in oral health. Health Affairs (2008) 27(2):404–412CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fournier S. Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research. J. Consumer Res. (1998) 24(4):343–373CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Garbarino E., Johnson M. S. The different roles of satisfaction, trust, and commitment in customer relationships. J. Marketing (1999) 63(2):70–87CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Girl Scouts Uniquely ME! The Girl Scout/Dove self-esteem program. (2010) . Accessed August 3, http://www.girlscouts.org/program/program_opportunities/leadership/uniquelyme.aspGoogle Scholar
  • Godfrey P. C., Merrill C. B., Hansen J. M. The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management J. (2009) 30(4):425–445CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hess D., Rogovsky N., Dunfee T. W. The next wave of corporate community involvement: Corporate social initiatives. California Management Rev. (2002) 44(2):110–125CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoch S. J., Deighton J. Managing what consumer learn from experience. J. Marketing (1989) 53(2):1–20CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Johnson D., Grayson K. Cognitive and affective trust in service relationships. J. Bus. Res. (2005) 58(4):500–507CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kotler P., Lee N. Best of breed. Stanford Soc. Innovation Rev. (2004) Spring):14–23Google Scholar
  • Kotler P., Lee N.Corporate Social Responsibility: Doing the Most Good for Your Company and Your Cause (2005) (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ) Google Scholar
  • Lackman C., Lanassa J. M. Family decision-making theory: An overview and assessment. Psych. Marketing (1993) 10(2):81–93CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lewit E. M., Kerrebrock N. Child indicators: Dental health. Future Children (1998) 8(1):133–42CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mahoney J. T., McGahan A. M., Pitelis C. N. The interdependence of private and public interests. Organ. Sci. (2009) 20(6):1034–1052LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Margolis J. D., Walsh J. P. Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Admin. Sci. Quart. (2003) 48(2):268–305CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McAllister D. J. Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Acad. Management J. (1995) 38(1):24–59CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McKinsey Quarterly Valuing corporate social responsibility: McKinsey global survey results. (2009) February). http://www.mckinseyquarterly.com/Valuing_corporate_social_responsibility_McKinsey_Global_Survey_Results_2309Google Scholar
  • Morgan A.Eating the Big Fish: How Challenger Brands Can Compete Against Brand Leaders (2009) (Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ) CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Morgan R. M., Hunt S. D. The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. J. Marketing (1994) 58(3):20–39CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pettigrew A. W., Smith N. C., Lenssen G. Corporate responsibility in strategy. Mainstreaming Corporate Responsibility (2009) (Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, UK) 12–20Google Scholar
  • Podsakoff P. M., Mackenzie S. B., Lee J.-Y., Podsakoff N. P. Common method bias in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. (2003) 88(5):879–904CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Porter M. E., Kramer M. R. The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2002) 80(12):56–69Google Scholar
  • Porter M. E., Kramer M. R. Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2006) 84(12):78–92Google Scholar
  • Porter M. E., Kramer M. R. Creating shared value. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2011) 89(1/2):62–77Google Scholar
  • Raghubir P., Roberts J., Lemon K. N., Winer R. S. Why, when, and how should the effect of marketing be measured? A stakeholder perspective for corporate social responsibility metrics. J. Public Policy Marketing (2010) 29(1):66–77CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Reichheld F. F. The one number you need to grow. Harvard Bus. Rev. (2003) 81(12):46–54Google Scholar
  • Rempel J. K., Holmes J. G., Zanna M. P. Trust in close relationships. J. Personality Soc. Psych. (1985) 49(1):95–112CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rousseau D., Sitkin S., Brut R., Camerer C. Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Acad. Management Rev. (1999) 23(3):393–404CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sen S., Bhattacharya C. B. Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. J. Marketing Res. (2001) 38(2):225–243CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sen S., Bhattacharya C. B., Korschun D. The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: A field experiment. J. Acad. Marketing Sci. (2006) 34(2):158–166CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shadish W. R., Cook T. D., Campbell D. T.Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference (2002) (Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA) Google Scholar
  • Shankar V., Carpenter G. S., Krishnamurthi L. Late mover advantage: How innovative late entrants outsell pioneers. J. Marketing Res. (1998) 35(1):54–70CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Simmons C. J., Becker-Olsen K. L. Achieving marketing objectives through social sponsorships. J. Marketing (2006) 70(4):154–169CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sirdeshmukh D., Singh J., Sabol B. Consumer trust, value, and loyalty in relational exchanges. J. Marketing (2002) 66(January):15–37CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Smith N. C. Corporate social responsibility: Whether or how? California Management Rev. (2003) 45(4):52–76CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Unilever Dove. (2010) . Accessed August 3, http://www.unilever.com/brands/personalcarebrands/dove/index.aspxGoogle Scholar
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Oral health in America: A report of the surgeon general—Executive summary. (2000) . National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, Department of Health and Human Services, Rockvile, MDGoogle Scholar
  • Waddock S.Leading Corporate Citizens: Vision, Values, and Value Added (2008) 3rd ed.(McGraw-Hill/Irwin, New York) Google Scholar
  • White House Task Force on Childhood Obesity Report to the President Solving the problem of childhood obesity within a generation. (2010) . Accessed August 16, http://www.letsmove.gov/white-house-task-force-childhood-obesity-report-presidentGoogle Scholar
  • Word D. L. Who responds/who doesn't? Analyzing variation in mail response rates during the 1990 census. (1997) . Working Paper 19, Population Division Bureau of the Census, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  • Yoon Y., Gurhan-Canli Z., Schwarz N. The effect of corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities on companies with bad reputations. J. Consumer Psych. (2006) 16(4):377–390CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhu T., Singh V., Manuszak M. D. Market structure and competition in the retail discount industry. J. Marketing Res. (2009) 46(4):453–466CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.