Gender Differences in Willingness to Guess

References

• Anderson J (1989) Sex-related differences on objective tests among undergraduates. Educational Stud. Math. 20(2):165–177.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Atkins WJ, Leder GC, O'Halloran PJ, Pollard GH, Taylor P (1991) Measuring risk taking. Educational Stud. Math. 22(3):297–308.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Babcock L, Laschever S (2007) Women Don't Ask: The High Cost of Avoiding Negotiation—And Positive Strategies for Change (Bantam Books, New York).Google Scholar
• Ben-Shakhar G, Sinai Y (1991) Gender differences in multiple-choice tests: The role of differential guessing tendencies. J. Educational Measurement 28(1):23–35.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bernasek A, Shwiff S (2001) Gender, risk, and retirement. J. Econom. Issues 35(2):345–356.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Hallock K (2001) The gender gap in top corporate jobs. Indust. Labor Relations Rev. 55:3–21.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beyer S (1990) Gender differences in the accuracy of self-evaluations of performance. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 59(5):960–970.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beyer S (1998) Gender differences in self-perception and negative recall biases. Sex Roles 38(1/2):103–133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beyer S (1999) Gender differences in the accuracy of grade expectancies and evaluations. Sex Roles 41(3/4):279–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beyer S, Bowden E (1997) Gender differences in self-perceptions: Convergent evidence from three measures of accuracy and bias. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 23(2):157–172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Borghans L, Golsteyn B, Heckman J, Meijers H (2009) Gender differences in risk aversion and ambiguity aversion. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 7(2–3):649–658.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burns J, Halliday S, Keswell M (2012) Gender and risk taking in the classroom. SALDRU Working Paper 87, Southern Africa Labour and Development Research Unit, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa. http://opensaldru.uct.ac.za/handle/11090/178.Google Scholar
• Burton N, Ramist L (2001) Predicting success in college: SAT studies of classes graduating since 1980. Research Report 2001-2, College Board Publications, New York.Google Scholar
• Clark MJ, Grandy J (1984) Sex differences in the academic performance of scholastic aptitude test takers. Report 84-8, College Board Publications, New York.Google Scholar
• CollegeBoard.org (2010) SAT subject tests practice questions. Accessed January 5, 2010, http://sat.collegeboard.org/practice/sat-subject-test-preparation.Google Scholar
• Croson R, Gneezy U (2009) Gender differences in preferences. J. Econom. Literature 47(2):448–474.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eckel C, Grossman P (2002) Sex differences and statistical stereotyping in attitudes toward financial risk. Evolution and Human Behav. 23(4):281–295.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eckel C, Grossman P (2008a) Forecasting risk attitudes: An experimental study using actual and forecast gamble choices. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 68(1):1–17.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eckel C, Grossman P (2008b) Men, women, and risk aversion: Experimental evidence. Plott CR, Smith VL, eds. Handbook of Experimental Economics Results, Vol. 1, Chap. 113 (North-Holland, Amsterdam), 1061–1073.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferber MA, Birnbaum BG, Green CA (1983) Gender differences in economic knowledge: A reevaluation of the evidence. J. Econom. Ed. 14(2):24–37.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Niederle M, Rustichini A (2003) Performance in competitive environments: Gender differences. Quart. J. Econom. 118(3):1049–1074.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hirschfeld M, Moore R, Brown E (1995) Exploring the gender gap on the GRE subject test in economics. J. Econom. Ed. 26(1):3–15.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Johnson J, Powell P (1994) Decision-making, risk, and gender: Are managers different? British J. Management 5(2):123–138.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karni E (2009) A mechanism for eliciting probabilities. Econometrica 77(2):603–606.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Krawczyk M (2011) Framing in the field: A simple experiment on the reflection effect. Working Paper 14/2011(54), University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein S, Fischhoff B, Phillips L (1982) Calibration in probabilities: The state of the art to 1980. Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A, eds. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK), 306–334.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lumsden KG, Scott A (1987) The economics student reexamined: Male-female differences in comprehension. J. Econom. Ed. 18(4):365–375.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Möbius MM, Niederle M, Niehaus P, Rosenblatt TS (2012) Managing self-confidence: Theory and experimental evidence. Working paper, Microsoft Research, Redmond, WA.Google Scholar
• Mondak J, Anderson M (2004) The knowledge gap: A reexamination of gender-based differences in political knowledge. J. Politics 66(2):492–512.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore E, Eckel C (2003) Measuring ambiguity aversion. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
• Niederle M, Vesterlund L (2007) Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? Quart. J. Econom. 122(3):1067–1101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niederle M, Vesterlund L (2010) Explaining the gender gap in math test scores: The role of competition. J. Econom. Perspect. 24(2):129–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Norton E, Wang H, Ai C (2004) Computing interaction effects and standard errors in logit and probit models. Stata J. 4(2):154–167.Crossref, Google Scholar
• O'Neill J (2003) The gender gap in wages, circa 2000. Amer. Econom. Rev. 93(2):309–314.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ramist L, Lewis C, McCamley-Jenkins L (1994) Student group differences in predicting college grades: Sex, language, and ethnic groups. Report 93-1, College Board Publications, New York.Google Scholar
• Ramos I, Lambating J (1996) Gender difference in risk-taking behavior and their relationship to SAT-mathematics performance. School Sci. Math. 96(4):202–207.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schubert R, Gysler M, Brown M, Brachinger H-W (2000) Gender specific attitudes towards risk and ambiguity: An experimental investigation. Working Paper 00/17, ETH Zurich, Zurich.Google Scholar
• Skaalvik S, Skaalvik E (2004) Gender differences in math and verbal self-concept, performance expectations, and motivation. Sex Roles 50(3/4):241–252.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Steele CM (1997) A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. Amer. Psychologist 52:613–629.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Swineford F (1941) Analysis of a personality trait. J. Educational Psych. 32(6):438–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Tannenbaum DI (2012) Do gender differences in risk aversion explain the gender gap in SAT scores? Uncovering risk attitudes and the test score gap. Unpublished paper, University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
• Walstad W, Robson D (1997) Differential item functioning and male-female differences on multiple-choice tests in economics. J. Econom. Ed. 28(2):155–171.Crossref, Google Scholar