Sequential Search and Learning from Rank Feedback: Theory and Experimental Evidence

References

• Bearden JN (2006) A new secretary problem with rank-based selection and cardinal payoffs. J. Math. Psych. 50:58–59.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bearden JN, Murphy RO (2007) On generalized secretary problems. Abdellaoui M, Luce RD, Machina MJ, Munier B, eds. Uncertainty and Risk: Mental, Formal and Experimental Representation (Springer, New York), 187–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bearden JN, Rapoport A, Murphy RO (2006) Sequential observation and selection with rank-dependent payoffs: An experimental study. Management Sci. 52:1437–1449.Link, Google Scholar
• Braunstein YM, Schotter A (1982) Labor market search: An experimental study. Econom. Inquiry 20:133–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cox JC, Oaxaca RL (1989) Laboratory experiments with a finite-horizon job-search model. J. Risk Uncertainty 2:301–330.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cox JC, Oaxaca RL (2000) Good news and bad news: Search from unknown wage offer distributions. Experiment. Econom. 2:197–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• David HA, Nagaraja HN (2003) Order Statistics, 3rd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferenstein EZ, Krasnosielska A (2010) No-information secretary problems with cardinal payoffs and Poisson arrivals. Statist. Probab. Lett. 80:221–227.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ferguson TS (1989) Who solved the secretary problem? Statist. Sci. 4:282–296.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischbacher U (2007) z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. 10:171–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Freeman PR (1983) The secretary problem and its extensions. Internat. Statist. Rev. 51:189–206.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gilbert JP, Mosteller F (1966) Recognizing the maximum of a sequence. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 61:35–73.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Heath C, Tversky A (1991) Preference and belief: Ambiguity and competence in choice under uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertainty 4:5–28.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hey JD (1987) Still searching. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 8:137–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Karlin S (1962) Stochastic models and optimal policy for selling an asset. Arrow KJ, Karlin S, Scarf H, eds. Studies in Applied Probability and Management Science (Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA) 148–158.Google Scholar
• Lippman SA, McCall JJ (1976) The economics of job search: A survey. Econom. Inquiry 14:155–189.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Loomes G, Moffat PG, Sugden R (2002) A microeconometric test of alternative stochastic theories of risky choice. J. Risk Uncertainty 24:103–130.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moorthy S, Ratchford BT, Talukdar D (1997) Consumer information search revisited: Theory and empirical analysis. J. Consumer Res. 23:263–277.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moser L (1956) On a problem of Cayley. Scripta Math. 22:289–292.Google Scholar
• Mucci AG (1973) Differential equations and optimal choice problems. Ann. Statist. 1:104–113.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Nyarko Y, Schotter A (2002) An experimental study of belief learning using elicited beliefs. Econometrica 70:971–1005.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Prastacos GP (1983) Optimal sequential investment decisions under conditions of uncertainty. Management Sci. 29:118–134.Link, Google Scholar
• Rapoport A, Tversky A (1970) Choice behavior in an optimal stopping task. Organ. Behav. Human Performance 5:105–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rogerson R, Shimer R, Wright R (2005) Search-theoretic models of the labor market: A survey. J. Econom. Literature 43:959–988.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sakaguchi M (1961) Dynamic programming of some sequential sampling design. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 2:446–466.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Samuel-Cahn E (2007) Optimal stopping for I.I.D. random variables based on the sequential information of the location of relative records only. Sequential Anal. 26:395–401.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schotter A, Braunstein YM (1981) Economic search: An experimental study. Econom. Inquiry 19:1–25.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seale DA, Rapoport A (1997) Sequential decision making with relative ranks: An experimental investigation of the secretary problem. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 69:221–236.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Seale DA, Rapoport A (2000) Optimal stopping behavior with relative ranks: The secretary problem with unknown population size. J. Behav. Decision Making 13:391–411.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sonnemans J (1998) Strategies of search. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 35:309–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sonnemans J (2000) Decisions and strategies in a sequential search experiment. J. Econom. Psych. 21:91–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stigler GJ (1961) The economics of information. J. Political Econom. 69:213–225.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Szajowski K (2009) A rank-based selection with cardinal payoffs and a cost of choice. Sci. Math. Jpn. 69:285–293.Google Scholar
• Wang SW (2011) Incentive effects: The case of belief elicitation from individuals in groups. Econom. Lett. 111:30–33.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zwick R, Rapoport A, Lo AKC, Muthukrishnan AV (2003) Consumer sequential search: Not enough or too much? Marketing Sci. 22:503–519.Link, Google Scholar