Marriage and Managers' Attitudes to Risk

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1926

References

  • Alton WS (2010) Judge tosses out prenup: Dodgers ownership still undecided. On the Record (blog) (December 8), http://altonlaw.blogspot.com/2010_12_01_archive.html.Google Scholar
  • Baker MD, Maner JK (2008) Risk-taking as a situationally sensitive male mating strategy. Evolution Human Behav. 29(6):391–395.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Becker GS (1973) A theory of marriage: Part I. J. Political Econom. 81(4):813–846.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bloom N, Van Reenen J (2010) Why do management practices differ across firms and countries? J. Econom. Perspect. 24(1):203–224.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burnham TC (2007) High-testosterone men reject low ultimatum game offers. Proc. Biol. Sci. 274(1623):2327–2330.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Burnham TC, Chapman JF, Gray PB, McIntyre MH, Lipson SF, Ellison PT (2003) Men in committed, romantic relationships have lower testosterone. Hormones Behav. 44(2):119–122.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cole H, Mailath G, Postlewaite A (2001) Investment and concern for relative position. Rev. Econom. Design 6:241–261.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Coles JL, Daniel ND, Naveen L (2006) Managerial incentives and risk-taking. J. Financial Econom. 79(2):431–468.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fama EF, French KR (1997) Industry costs of equity. J. Financial Econom. 43(2):153–193.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guay WR (1999) The sensitivity of CEO wealth to equity risk: An analysis of the magnitude and determinants. J. Financial Econom. 53(1):43–71.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Guiso L, Rustichini A (2011) Understanding the size and profitability of firms: The role of a biological factor. Discussion paper, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London.Google Scholar
  • Levi M, Li K, Zhang F (2010) Deal or no deal: Hormones and the mergers and acquisitions game. Management Sci. 56(9):1462–1483.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Malmendier U, Tate G (2009) Superstar CEOs. Quart. J. Econom. 124(4):1593–1638.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mazzocco M (2004) Saving, risk sharing, and preferences for risk. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(4):1169–1182.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Panousi V, Papanikolaou D (2012) Investment, idiosyncratic risk, and ownership. J. Finance 67(3):1113–1148.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Roussanov N (2010) Diversification and its discontents: Idiosyncratic and entrepreneurial risk in the quest for social status. J. Finance 65(5):1755–1788.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sapienza P, Zingales L, Maestripieri D (2009) Gender differences in financial risk aversion and career choices are affected by testosterone. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106(36):15268–15273.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shemesh J (2010) CEO social status and risk taking. Working paper, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Voena A (2011) Yours, mine and ours: Do divorce laws affect the intertemporal behavior of married couples? SIEPR Discussion Paper 10-022, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.