Counterfeiters: Foes or Friends? How Counterfeits Affect Sales by Product Quality Tier

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1932

References

  • AQSIQ (1996) Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine Year Book (National Bureau of Statistics of China, Beijing).Google Scholar
  • Berger J, Ward M (2010) Subtle signals of inconspicuous consumption. J. Consumer Res. 37:555–569.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berger J, Sorensen AT, Rasmussen SJ (2010) Positive effects of negative publicity: When negative reviews increase sales. Marketing Sci. 29(5):815–827.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Biais B, Perotti E (2008) Entrepreneurs and new ideas. RAND J. Econom. 39(4):1105–1125.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bresnahan T, Greenstein S, Henderson R (2011) Schumpeterian competition and diseconomies of scope: Illustrations from the histories of Microsoft and IBM. HBS Working Paper 11-077, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
  • Castro J, Balkin D, Shepherd D (2008) Can entrepreneurial firms benefit from product piracy? J. Bus. Venturing 23(1):75–90.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cogitamus Consulting (2009) The global footwear market: Athletic and non-athletics shoes, packaged facts (August), http://wulibraries.typepad.com/files/footwear.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Conner KR, Rumelt RP (1991) Software piracy: An analysis of protection strategies. Management Sci. 37(2):125–139.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Fink C, Maskus K, Qian Y (2010) The economic effects of counterfeiting and piracy. Advisory Committee on Enforcement WIPO 9/3/2010, World Intellectual Property Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  • Gabriel SJ (1998) Is banking reform in china still on track? Satya Gabriel's Online Papers: China Essay Series. Last accessed July 20, 2014, http://www.satya.us.Google Scholar
  • Givon M, Mahajan V, Muller E (1995) Software piracy—Estimation of lost sales and the impact on software diffusion. J. Marketing 59(1):29–37.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Godes D, Mayzlin D (2009) Firm-created word-of-mouth communication: Evidence from a field test. Marketing Sci. 28(4):721–739.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gosline R (2009) Simultaneous distinction, democratization and omnivorism effects: A longitudinal analysis of dynamic symbolic boundaries in counterfeit consumption networks. Dissertation, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
  • Gosline R (2010) Counterfeit labels: Good for luxury brands? Forbes (February 12), http://www.forbes.com/2010/02/11/luxury-goods-counterfeit-fakes-chanel-gucci-cmo-network-renee-richardson-gosline.html.Google Scholar
  • Grossman G, Shapiro C (1988a) Foreign counterfeiting of status goods. Quart. J. Econom. 103(1):79–100.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grossman G, Shapiro C (1988b) Counterfeit-product trade. Amer. Econom. Rev. 78(1):59–75.Google Scholar
  • Hong S-H (2013) Measuring the effect of Napster on recorded music sales: Difference-in-differences estimates under compositional changes. J. Applied Econom. 28(2):297–324.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hui K-L, Png IPL (2003) Piracy and the legitimate demand for recorded music. Contributions to Econom. Anal. Policy 2(1):Article 11.Google Scholar
  • Katz ML, Shapiro C (1994) Systems competition and network effects. J. Econom. Perspect. 8(2):93–115.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Keller K (2003) Brand synthesis: The multidimensionality of brand knowledge. J. Consumer Res. 29(4):595–600.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Khan BZ (2004) Does copyright piracy pay? The effects of U.S. international copyright laws on the market for books, 1790–1920. NBER Working Paper 10271, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • KPMG China (2010) Refined strategies: Luxury extends its reach across China. Last accessed July 20, 2014, https://www.kpmg.com/CN/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/Documents/Luxury-extends-its-reach-across-China-201005.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Kuksov D, Xie Y (2012) Competition in a status goods market. J. Marketing Res. 49(5):609–623.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kyle MK, McGahan AM (2012) Investments in pharmaceuticals before and after TRIPS. Rev. Econom. Statist. 94(4):1157–1172.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lerner J (2009) The empirical impact of intellectual property rights on innovation: Puzzles and clues. Amer. Econom. Rev.: Papers Proc. 99(2):343–348.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Liebowitz SJ (2006) Economists examine file-sharing and music sales. Illing G, Peitz M, eds. Industrial Organization and the Digital Economy (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 145–174.Google Scholar
  • Lin J (2011) Fake Stuff (Routledge, Taylor & Francis, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mortimer JH, Nosko C, Sorensen A (2012) Supply responses to digital distribution: Recorded music and live performances. Inform. Econom. Policy 24(1):3–14.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • National Bureau of Statistics of China (1995) Codebook for the Third Chinese National Industrial Census (National Bureau of Statistics of China, Beijing).Google Scholar
  • National Bureau of Statistics of China (1995–2004) National Statistics Year Books (National Bureau of Statistics of China, Beijing).Google Scholar
  • Naughton B (2002) China's economic think tanks: Their changing role in the 1990s. China Quart. 171:625–635.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Oberholzer-Gee F, Strumpf K (2009) File sharing and copyright. Lerner J, Stern S, eds. Innovation Policy and the Economy, Vol. 10 (University of Chicago Press, Chicago), 19–55.Google Scholar
  • Piller C (2006) How piracy opens doors for windows. Los Angeles Times (April 9), http://articles.latimes.com/2006/apr/09/business/fi-micropiracy9.Google Scholar
  • Qian Y (2007) Do national patent laws stimulate domestic innovation in a global patenting environment? A cross-country analysis of pharmaceutical patent protection: 1978–2002. Rev. Econom. Statist. 89(3):436–453.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Qian Y (2008) Impacts of entry by counterfeiters. Quart. J. Econom. 123(4):1577–1609.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Qian Y (2009) Are national patent laws the blossoming rain?—Evidence from domestic innovation, technology transfers, and international trade post patent implementations from 1978–2002. Netanel N, ed. The Development Agenda: Global Intellectual Property and Developing Countries (Oxford University Press, London).Google Scholar
  • Qian Y (2014) Brand management and strategies against counterfeits. J. Econom. Management Strategy 23(2):317–343.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Qian Y, Shih V (2011) Code book for Board of Directors of Chinese firms. Memo, last accessed July 20, 2014, http://www.nber.org/~yiqian/board_codebook.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Qian Y, Xie H (2011) No customer left behind: A distribution-free Bayesian approach to accounting for missing Xs in marketing models. Marketing Sci. 30(4):717–736.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Qian Y, Xie H (2014) Which customers are lost to counterfeiters? An application of new data fusion approaches. Marketing Sci. 33(3):437–448.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Qian Y, Anderson E, Simester D (2014) Spillover effects of a low-quality entrant. Working paper, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.Google Scholar
  • Raustiala K, Sprigman C (2006) The piracy paradox: Innovation and intellectual property in fashion design. Virginia Law Rev. 92(8):1687–1777.Google Scholar
  • Raustiala K, Sprigman C (2010) Why imitation is the sincerest form of fashion. New York Times (August 12), http://www.nytimes.com/.Google Scholar
  • Rob R, Waldfogel J (2006) Piracy on the high Cs: Music downloading, sales displacement, and social welfare in a sample of college students. J. Law Econom. 49(1):29–62.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schmidle N (2010) Inside the knockoff-tennis-shoe factory. New York Times (August 19), http://www.nytimes.com/.Google Scholar
  • Takeyama LN (1994) The welfare implications of unauthorized reproduction of intellectual property in the presence of demand network externalities. J. Indust. Econom. 42(2):155–166.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Thursby M, Jensen R, Thursby J (1991) Smuggling, camouflaging, and market structure. Quart. J. Econom. 106(3):789–814.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Zhang Y, Li Y, Zhu T (2011) How multiple anchors affect judgment? Evidence from the lab and eBay. Working paper, National University of Singapore, Singapore.Google Scholar
  • Zhao M (2006) Conducting R&D in countries with weak intellectual property rights protection. Management Sci. 52(8):1185–1199.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.