Gender Differences in the Willingness to Compete Emerge Early in Life and Persist

References

• Almås I, Cappelen AW, Salvanes KG, Sørensen EØ, Tungodden B (2014) Willingness to compete: Family matters. Working paper, Norwegian School of Economics (NHH), Bergen, Norway.Google Scholar
• Andersen S, Ertac S, Gneezy U, List JA, Maximiano S (2013) Gender, competitiveness and socialization at a young age: Evidence from a matrilineal and a patriarchal society. Rev. Econom. Statist. 95:1438–1443.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balafoutas L, Sutter M (2012) Affirmative action policies promote women and do not harm efficiency in the lab. Science 335:579–582.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Balafoutas L, Kerschbamer R, Sutter M (2012) Distributional preferences and competitive behavior. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 83:125–135.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blanco M, Engelmann D, Normann H-T (2011) A within-subject analysis of other-regarding preferences. Games Econom. Behav. 72:321–338.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Blau FD, Ferber MA, Winkler AE (2010) The Economics of Women, Men, and Work, 6th ed. (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
• Booth AL, Nolen PJ (2012) Choosing to compete: How different are girls and boys? J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 81:542–555.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buser T (2012) The impact of the menstrual cycle and hormonal contraceptives on competitiveness. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 83:1–10.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Buser T, Niederle M, Oosterbeek H (2014) Gender, competitiveness and career choices. Quart. J. Econom. 129:1409–1447.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Calsamiglia C, Franke J, Rey-Biel P (2013) The incentive effects of affirmative action in a real-effort tournament. J. Public Econom. 98:15–31.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cardenas J-C, Dreber A, von Essen E, Ranehill E (2012) Gender differences in competitiveness and risk taking: Comparing children in Colombia and Sweden. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 83:11–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cason TN, Masters WA, Sheremeta RM (2010) Entry into winner-take-all and proportional-prize contests: An experimental study. J. Public Econom. 94:604–611.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Croson R, Gneezy U (2009) Gender differences in preferences. J. Econom. Literature 47:448–474.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dariel A, Nikiforakis N (2014) Cooperators and reciprocators: A within-subject analysis of pro-social behavior. Econom. Lett. 122:163–166.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Datta Gupta N, Poulsen A, Villeval M-C (2013) Gender matching and competitiveness: Experimental evidence. Econom. Inquiry 51:816–835.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dohmen T, Falk A (2011) Performance pay and multi-dimensional sorting—Productivity, preferences and gender. Amer. Econom. Rev. 111:556–590.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dreber A, von Essen E, Ranehill E (2011) Outrunning the gender gap—Boys and girls compete equally. Experiment. Econom. 14:567–582.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dreber A, von Essen E, Ranehill E (2014) Gender and competition in adolescence: Task matters. Experiment. Econom. 17:154–172.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eisenberg N, Wolchik SA, Hernandez R, Pasternack JF (1985) Parental socialization of young children’s play: A short-term longitudinal study. Child Development 56:1506–1513.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Bernhard H, Rockenbach B (2008) Egalitarianism in young children. Nature 454:1079–1084.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fischbacher Urs (2007) Z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experiment. Econom. 10:171–178.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Flory JA, Leibbrandt A, List J (2014) Do competitive workplaces deter female workers? A large-scale natural field experiment on gender differences in job-entry decisions. Rev. Econom. Stud. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Freeman NK (2007) Preschoolers' perceptions of gender appropriate toys and their parents' beliefs about genderized behaviors: Miscommunication, mixed messages, or hidden truths? Early Childhood Ed. J. 34:357–366.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Rustichini A (2004) Gender and competition at a young age. Amer. Econom. Rev., Papers Proc. 94:377–381.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Leonard KL, List JA (2009) Gender differences in competition: Evidence from a matrilineal and a patriarchal society. Econometrica 77:1637–1664.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gneezy U, Niederle M, Rustichini A (2003) Performance in competitive environments: Gender differences. Quart. J. Econom. 118:1049–1074.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Günther C, Ekinci NA, Schwieren C, Strobel M (2010) Women can’t jump?—An experiment on competitive attitudes and stereotype threat. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 75:395–401.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hyde JS, Lindberg SM, Linn MC, Ellis AB, Williams CC (2008) Gender similarities characterize math performance. Science 321:494–495.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kail RV, Cavanaugh JC (2010) Human Development: A Life-Span View, 5th ed. (Wadsworth Publishing, Belmont, CA).Google Scholar
• Khachatryan K (2012) Gender differences in preferences at a young age? Experimental evidence from Armenia. Working paper, Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm.Google Scholar
• Meier S, Sprenger C (2014) Temporal stability of time preferences. Rev. Econom. Statist. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
• Miller AR, Segal C (2012) Does temporary affirmative action produce persistent effects? A study of black and female employment in law enforcement. Rev. Econom. Statist. 94:1107–1125.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niederle M, Vesterlund L (2007) Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? Quart. J. Econom. 122:1067–1101.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niederle M, Vesterlund L (2010) Gender and competition. Annual Rev. Econom. 3:601–630.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niederle M, Segal C, Vesterlund L (2013) How costly is diversity? Affirmative action in light of gender differences in competitiveness. Management Sci. 59:1–16.Link, Google Scholar
• Papaiakovou G, Giannakos A, Michailidis C, Patikas D, Bassa E, Kalopisis V, Anthrakidis N, Kotzamanidis C (2009) The effect of chronological age and gender on the development of sprint performance during childhood and puberty. J. Strength Conditioning Res. 23:2568–2573.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sutter M, Kocher MG, Glätzle-Rützler D, Trautmann ST (2013) Impatience and uncertainty: Experimental decisions predict adolescents' field behavior. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103:510–531.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Villeval M-C (2012) Ready, steady, compete. Science 335:544–545.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Volk S, Thöni C, Ruigrok W (2012) Temporal stability and psychological foundations of cooperation preferences. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 81:664–676.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weichselbaumer D, Winter-Ebmer R (2007) The effects of competition and equal treatment laws on gender wage differentials. Econom. Policy 22:236–287.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Weinberger N, Stein K (2008) Early competitive game playing in same- and mixed-gender peer groups. Merrill-Palmer Quart. 54:499–514.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wozniak D, Harbaugh WT, Mayr U (2014) The menstrual cycle and performance feedback alter gender differences in competitive choices. J. Labor Econom. 32:161–198.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang J (2013) Can experimental economics explain competitive behavior outside the lab? Working paper, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay.Google Scholar