Do Women Avoid Salary Negotiations? Evidence from a Large-Scale Natural Field Experiment

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1994

References

  • Babcock L, Laschever S (2003) Women Don’t Ask: Negotiation and the Gender Divide (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Babcock L, Gelfand M, Small D, Stayn H (2006) Gender differences in the propensity to initiate negotiations. Crèmer DD, Zeelenberg M, Murnighan JK, eds. Social Psychology and Economics (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ), 239–259.Google Scholar
  • Balafoutas L, Sutter M (2012) Affirmative action policies promote women and do not harm efficiency in the lab. Science 335(6068):579–582.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bertrand M (2010) Card OD, Ashenfelter O, eds. New Perspectives on Gender, Handbook of Labor Economics, Vol. 4B (Elsevier Science, Amsterdam), 1543–1590.Google Scholar
  • Beyer S (1990) Gender differences in the accuracy of self-evaluations of performance. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 59(5):960–970.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blau F, Kahn LM (2000) Gender differences in pay. J. Econom. Perspect. 14(4):75–99.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blau F, Feber M, Winkler A (2010) The Economics of Women, Men and Work (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Bowles HR, Babcock L, Lai L (2007) Social incentives for gender differences in the propensity to initiate negotiations: Sometimes it does hurt to ask. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 103(1):84–103.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bowles HR, Babcock L, McGinn KL (2005) Constraints and triggers: Situational mechanics of gender in negotiations. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 89(6):951–965.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Charness G, Gneezy U (2012) Strong evidence for gender differences in risk taking. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 83(1):50–58.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Charness G, Masclet D, Villeval MC (2014) The dark side of competition for status. Management Sci. 60(1):38–55.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Croson R, Gneezy U (2009) Gender differences in preferences. J. Econom. Literature 47(2):448–474.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Datta Gupta N, Poulsen A, Villeval MC (2013) Gender matching and competitiveness: Experimental evidence. Econom. Inquiry 51(1):816–835.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dreber A, von Essen E, Ranehill E (2014) Gender and competition in adolescence: Tasks matter. Experiment. Econom. 17(1):154–172.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eagly AH (1987) Sex Differences in Social Behavior: A Social-Role Interpretation (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ).Google Scholar
  • Eckel CC, Grossman PJ (2008a) Differences in the economic decisions of men and women: Experimental evidence. Plott CR, Smith VL, eds. Handbook of Experimental Economics Results, Vol. 1 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 1061–1073.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eckel CC, Grossman PJ (2008b) Men, women and risk aversion: Experimental evidence. Plott CR, Smith VL, eds. Handbook of Experimental Economics Results, Vol. 1 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 509–519.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fleiss JL (1981) Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 2nd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
  • Flory JA, Leibbrandt A, List JA (2015) Do competitive work places deter female workers? A large-scale natural field experiment on job-entry decisions. Rev. Econom. Stud. 82(1):122–155.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gerhart B, Rynes S (1991) Determinants and consequences of salary negotiations by male and female MBA graduates. J. Appl. Psych. 76(2):256–262.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gneezy U, Niederle M, Rustichini A (2003) Performance in competitive environments: Gender differences. Quart. J. Econom. 118(3):1049–1074.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldin C, Rouse C (2000) Orchestrating impartiality: The impact of “blind” auditions on female musicians. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90(4):715–741.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Greig F (2008) Propensity to negotiate and career advancement: Evidence from an investment bank that women are on a “slow elevator.” Negotiation J. 24(4):495–508.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hall R, Krueger A (2012) Evidence on the incidence of wage posting, wage bargaining, and on-the-job search. Amer. Econom. J.: Macroeconomics 4(4):56–67.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kuhn PJ, Villeval MC (2011) Do women prefer a co-operative work environment? IZA Discussion Paper 5999, IZA, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
  • Lax D, Sebenius J (1986) The Manager as Negotiator: Bargaining for Cooperation and Competitive Gain (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Maxwell NL (2006) The Working Life: The Labor Market for Workers in Low-Skilled Jobs (W.E. Upjohn Institute, Kalamazoo, MI).Google Scholar
  • Mischel W (1977) The interaction of person and situation. Magnusson D, Endler NS, eds. Personality at the Crossroads: Current Issues in Interactional Psychology (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ), 333–352.Google Scholar
  • Niederle M, Vesterlund L (2007) Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? Quart. J. Econom. 122(3):1067–1101.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Niederle M, Segal C, Vesterlund L (2013) How costly is diversity? Affirmative action in light of gender differences in competitiveness. Management Sci. 59(1):1–16.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Phipps S, Burton P, Lethbridge L (2001) In and out of the labor market: Long-term income consequences of child-related interruptions to women’s paid work. Canad. J. Econom. 34(2):411–429.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Raiffa H (1982) The Art and Science of Negotiation (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Google Scholar
  • Small DA, Gelfand M, Babcock L, Gettman H (2007) Who goes to the bargaining table? The influence of gender and framing on the initiation of negotiation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 93(4):600–613.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Spencer SJ, Steele CM, Quinn DM (1999) Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. J. Experiment. Soc. Psych. 35(1):4–28.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steele CM (1997) A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual ability and performance. Amer. Psychologist 52(6):613–629.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stuhlmacher AF, Citera M, Willis T (2007) Gender differences in virtual negotiation: Theory and research. Sex Roles 57(5–6):329–339.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2010) Table 9—Employed persons by occupation, sex, and age. Employment Earnings 57(1). http://www.bls.gov/opub/ee/empearn201001.pdf.Google Scholar
  • U.S. Department of Labor (2011) Highlights of women’s earnings in 2010. Report 1031, Table 2—Median usual weekly earnings of full-time wage and salary workers, by detailed occupation and sex, 2010 annual averages. http://www.bls.gov/cps/cpswom2010.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Walters AE, Stuhlmacher AF, Meyer LL (1998) Gender and negotiator competitiveness: A meta-analysis. Organ. Behav. Human Decision Processes 76(1):1–29.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Weichselbaumer D, Winter-Ebmer R (2007) The effects of competition and equal treatment laws on gender wage differentials. Econom. Policy 22(50):235–287.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.