The Effect of Social Interaction on Economic Transactions: Evidence from Changes in Two Retail Formats

References

• Ahmad F, Hogg-Johnson S, Stewart DE, Skinner HA, Glazier RH, Levinson W (2009) Computer-assisted screening for intimate partner violence and control: A randomized trial. Ann. Internal Medicine 151(2):93–102.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akerlof GA, Kranton RE (2000) Economics and identity. Quart. J. Econom. 115(3):715–753.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Aldred H, Gott M, Gariballa S (2005) Advanced heart failure: Impact on older patients and informal carers. J. Advanced Nursing 49(2):116–124.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Allen-O’Donnell M, Cottingham M, Nowak T, Snyder K (2011) Impact of group settings and gender on meals purchased by college students. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 41(9):2268–2283.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ariely D, Levav J (2000) Sequential choice in group settings: Taking the road less traveled and less enjoyed. J. Consumer Res. 27(3):279–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baddeley AD, Thomson N, Buchanan M (1975) Word length and the structure of short-term memory. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 14(6):575–589.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banaji M, Prentice D (1994) The self in social contexts. Annual Rev. Psych. 45(1):297–332.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Belk RW (1980) Effects of consistency of visible consumption patterns on impression formation. Adv. Consumer Res. 7:365–371.Google Scholar
• Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S (2004) How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Quart. J. Econom. 119(1):249–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bollinger B, Leslie P, Sorensen A (2011) Calorie posting in chain restaurants. Amer. Econom. J.: Econom. Policy 3(1):91–128.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boyd KJ, Murray SA, Kendall M, Worth A, Benton TF, Clausen H (2004) Living with advanced heart failure: A prospective, community based study of patients and their carers. Eur. J. Heart Failure 6(5):585–591.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Hu Y, Simester D (2011) Goodbye Pareto principle, hello long tail: The effect of search costs on the concentration of product sales. Management Sci. 57(8):1373–1386.Link, Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Hu YJ, Smith M (2003) Consumer surplus in the digital economy: Estimating the value of increased product variety at online booksellers. Management Sci. 49(11):1580–1596.Link, Google Scholar
• Card D, Dahl GB (2011) Family violence and football: The effect of unexpected emotional cues on violent behavior. Quart. J. Econom. 126(1):103–143.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chapple A, Ziebland S, McPherson A (2004) Qualitative study of men’s perceptions of why treatment delays occur in the UK for those with testicular cancer. British J. General Practice 54(498): 25–32.Google Scholar
• Coopersmith J (2000) Pornography, videotape, and the Internet. IEEE Tech. Soc. Magazine 19(1):27–34.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dahl D, Gorn G, Weinberg C (1998) The impact of embarrassment on condom purchase behavior. Canadian J. Public Health 89(6):368–370.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Daughety A, Reinganum J (2010) Public goods, social pressure, and the choice between privacy and publicity. Amer. Econom. J.: Microeconomics 2(2):191–221.Crossref, Google Scholar
• De Los Santos B, Hortaçsu A, Wildenbeest MR (2012) Testing models of consumer search using data on Web browsing and purchasing behavior. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(6):2955–2980.Crossref, Google Scholar
• DellaVigna S, List JA, Malmendier U (2012) Testing for altruism and social pressure in charitable giving. Quart. J. Econom. 127(1):1–56.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Edelman B (2009) Red light states: Who buys online adult entertainment? J. Econom. Perspect. 23(1):209–220.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Frosch DL, May SG, Rendle KAS, Tietbohl C, Elwyn G (2012) Authoritarian physicians and patients’ fear of being labeled “difficult” among key obstacles to shared decision making. Health Affairs 31(5):1030–1038.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Gackenbach J (2007) Psychology and the Internet: Intrapersonal, Interpersonal, and Transpersonal Implications (Academic Press, Waltham, MA).Google Scholar
• Goffman E (1956) Embarrassment and social organization. Amer. J. Soc. 62(3):264–271.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goffman E (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (Doubleday Anchor Books, Garden City, NY).Google Scholar
• Griffiths MD (2001) Sex on the Internet: Observations and implications for Internet sex addiction. J. Sex Res. 38(4):333–342.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Herman CP, Polivy J (1996) What does abnormal eating tell us about normal eating? Meiselman HL, MacFie HJH, eds. Food Choice, Acceptance, and Consumption (Springer, New York), 207–238.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ifcher J, Zarghamee H (2011) Happiness and time preference: The effect of positive affect in a random-assignment experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 101(7):3109–3129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imai K, King G, Nall C (2009) The essential role of pair matching in cluster-randomized experiments, with application to the Mexican universal health insurance evaluation. Statist. Sci. 24(1):29–53.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imbens GW (2011) Experimental design for unit and cluster randomid trials. Working paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
• Keltner D, Buswell BN (1997) Embarrassment: Its distinct form and appeasement functions. Psych. Bull. 122(3):250–270.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kotler P, Keller KL (2009) Marketing Management, 13th ed. (Pearson-Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ).Google Scholar
• Lee A, Goldman M (1979) Effect of staring on normal and overweight students. J. Soc. Psych. 108(2):165–169.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lerman C, Rimer B, Trock B, Balshem A, Engstrom P (1990) Factors associated with repeat adherence to breast cancer screening. Preventive Medicine 19(3):279–290.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li H, Rosenzweig M, Zhang J (2010) Altruism, favoritism, and guilt in the allocation of family resources: Sophie’s choice in Mao’s mass send-down movement. J. Political Econom. 118(1):1–38.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McDevitt R, Roberts J (2014) Market structure and gender disparity in health care: Preferences, competition, and quality of care. RAND J. Econom. 45(1):116–139.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Meischke H, Eisenberg MS, Schaeffer SM, Damon SK, Larsen MP, Henwood DK (1995) Utilization of emergency medical services for symptoms of acute myocardial infarction. Heart Lung 24(1):11–18.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Niemi R (1976) Costs of voting and nonvoting. Public Choice 27(1):115–119.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Olsson C, Lyon P, Hornell A, Ivarsson A, Sydner YM (2009) Food that makes you different: The stigma experienced by adolescents with celiac disease. Qualitative Health Res. 19(7):976–984.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Polivy J, Herman C, Hackett R, Kuleshnyk I (1986) The effects of self-attention and public attention on eating in restrained and unrestrained subjects. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 50(6):1253–1260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pozzi A (2012) Shopping cost and brand exploration in online grocery. Amer. Econom. J.: Microeconomics 4(3):96–120.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rabin M (1993) Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. Amer. Econom. Rev. Papers Proc. 83(5):1281–1302.Google Scholar
• Roland G, Fryer J (2014) Injecting charter school best practices into traditional public schools: Evidence from field experiments. Quart. J. Econom. 129(3):1355–1407.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Rosman K (2012) Books women read when no one can see the cover. Wall Street Journal (March 14), http://www.wsj.com/.Google Scholar
• Roth D, Herman C, Polivy J, Pliner P (2001) Self-presentational conflict in social eating situations: A normative perspective. Appetite 36(2):165–171.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sabini J, Siepmann M, Stein J, Meyerowitz M (2000) Who is embarrassed by what? Cognition Emotion 14(2):213–240.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Scott Morton F (2006) Consumer benefit from use of the Internet. Jaffee AB, Lerner J, Stern S, eds. Innovation Policy and the Economy, Vol. 6 (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA), 67–90.Google Scholar
• Seim K, Waldfogel J (2013) Public monopoly and economic efficiency: Evidence from the Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board’s entry decisions. Amer. Econom. Rev. 103(2):831–862.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Skog O (2000) An experimental study of a change from over-the-counter to self-service sales of alcoholic beverages in monopoly outlets. J. Studies on Alcohol 61(1):95–100.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Suler J (2004) The online disinhibition effect. Cyber Psych. Behav. 7(3):321–326.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Waters A, Hill A, Waller G (2001) Internal and external antecedents of binge eating episodes in a group of women with bulimia nervosa. Internat. J. Eating Disorders 29(1):17–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zentner A, Smith M, Kaya C (2013) How video rental patterns change as consumers move online. Management Sci. 59(11):2622–2634.Link, Google Scholar