An Interproduct Competition Model Incorporating Branding Hierarchy and Product Similarities Using Store-Level Data

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2039

References

  • Ailawadi K, Kopalle PK, Neslin S (2005) Predicting competitive response to a major policy change: Combining game-theoretic and empirical analyses. Marketing Sci. 24(1):12–24.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ansari A, Mela CF (2003) E-customization. J. Marketing Res. 40(2):131–145.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Antoniak CE (1974) Mixtures of Dirichlet processes with applications to nonparametric problems. Ann. Statist. 2(4):1152–1174.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Berry S, Levinsohn J, Pakes A (1995) Automobile prices in market equilibrium. Econometrica 63(4):841–890.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Boatwright P, McCullogh R, Rossi P (1999) Account-level modeling for trade promotion: An application of a constrained parameter hierarchical model. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 94(448):1063–1073.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Braun M, Bonfrer A (2011) Scalable inference of customer similarities from interactions data using Dirichlet processes. Marketing Sci. 30(3):513–531.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Bresnahan TF (1981) Departures from marginal cost pricing in the American automobile industry: Estimates for 1977–1978. J. Econometrics 17(2):201–277.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bresnahan TF (1987) Competition and collusion in the American automobile industry: The 1955 price war. J. Indust. Econom. 35(4):457–482.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bronnenberg BJ, Vanhonacker WH (1996) Limited choice sets, local price response and implied measures of price competition. J. Marketing Res. 33(2):163–173.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Carpenter GS, Nakamoto K (1989) Consumer preference formation and pioneering advantage. J. Marketing Res. 26(3):285–298.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chintagunta PK, Jain DC, Vilcassim NK (1991) Investigating heterogeneity in brand preferences in logit models for panel data. J. Marketing Res. 28(4):417–428.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Chintagunta PK (1994) Heterogeneous logit model implications for brand positioning. J. Marketing Res. 31(2):304–312.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Conley TG, Hansen CB, McCullogh RE, Rossi PE (2008) A semi-parametric Bayesian approach to the instrumental variable problem. J. Econometrics 144(1):276–305.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Diebolt J, Robert CP (1994) Estimation of finite mixture distributions through Bayesian sampling. J. Royal Statist. Soc. Ser. B 56(2):363–375.Google Scholar
  • Dunson DB, Xue Y, Carin L (2008) The matrix stick-breaking process. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 103(481):317–327.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Eliashberg J, Chatterjee R (1985) Analytical models of competition with implications for marketing: Issues, findings, and outlook. J. Marketing Res. 22(3):237–261.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Elrod T, Keane MP (1995) A factor-analytic probit model for representing market structure in panel data. J. Marketing Res. 32(1):1–16.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Escobar MD, West M (1995) Bayesian density estimation and inference using mixtures. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 90(430):577–588.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fader PS, Hardie BGS (1996) Modeling consumer choice among SKUs. J. Marketing Res. 33(4):442–452.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Feenstra RC, Levinsohn JA (1995) Estimating markups and market conduct with multidimensional product attributes. Rev. Econom. Stud. 62(1):19–52.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ferguson TS (1973) A Bayesian analysis of some nonparametric problems. Ann. Statist. 1(2):209–230.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ghosh K, Ghosh P, Tiwari RC (2010) Invited discussion on nested Dirichlet process prior (by Rodriguez, Dunson and Gelfand). J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 103:1147–1149.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gilbride TJ, Allenby GM (2004) A choice model with conjunctive, disjunctive and compensatory screening rules. Marketing Sci. 23(3):391–406.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gilbride TJ, Lenk PJ (2010) Posterior predictive model checking: An application to multivariate normal heterogeneity. J. Marketing Res. 47(4):896–909.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Goldberg PK (1995) Product differentiation and oligopoly in international markets: The case of the U.S. automobile industry. Econometrica 63(4):891–951.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Handcock MS, Raftery AE, Tantrum JM (2007) Model-based clustering for social networks. J. Royal Statist. Soc. Ser. A 170(2):301–354.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hjort NL, Holmes C, Muller P, Walker SG (2010) Bayesian Nonparametrics (Cambridge University Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ho M-W, Tu W, Ghosh P, Tiwari CR (2013) A nested Dirichlet process analysis of cluster randomized trial data with application in geriatric care assessment. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 108(501): 48–68.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoch SJ, Kim BD, Montgomery AL, Rossi PE (1995) Determinants of store-level price elasticities. J. Marketing Res. 32(1):17–29.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hoff PD, Raftery AE, Handcock MS (2002) Latent space approaches to social network analysis. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 97(460): 1090–1098.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Horsky D, Nelson P (1992) New brand positioning and pricing in an oligopolistic market. Marketing Sci. 11(2):133–153.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Ishwaran H, James LF (2001) Gibbs sampling methods for stick-breaking priors. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 96(453):161–173.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kalwani MU, Morrison DG (1977) A parsimonious description of the Hendry System. Management Sci. 23(5):467–477.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kamakura WA, Russell GT (1989) A probabilistic choice model for market segmentation and elasticity structure. J. Marketing Res. 25:379–390.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kannan PK, Wright GP (1991a) Modeling and testing structured markets: A nested logit approach. Marketing Sci. 10(1):58–82.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kannan PK, Wright GP (1991b) On testing competitive market structures. Marketing Sci. 10(4):338–347.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kim JG, Menzefricke U, Feinberg FM (2004) Assessing heterogeneity in discrete choice models using a Dirichlet process prior. Rev. Marketing Sci. 2(1):1–39.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kim M, Chintagunta PK (2012) Investigating brand preferences across social groups and consumption contexts. Quant. Marketing Econom. 10(3):305–333.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kleinman KP, Ibrahim JG (1998) A semi-parametric Bayesian approach to generalized linear mixed models. Statist. Medicine 17(22):2579–2596.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kottas A, Muller P, Quintana F (2005) Nonparametric Bayesian modeling for multivariate ordinal data. J. Computational and Graphical Statist. 14(3):610–625.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lau JW, Green PJ (2007) Bayesian model-based clustering procedures. J. Computational and Graphical Statist. 16(3):526–558.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leeflang PSH, Wittink DR, Wedel M, Naert PA (2000) Building Models for Marketing Decisions (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Medvedovic M, Yeung KY, Bumgarner RE (2004) Bayesian mixture model based clustering of replicated microarray data. Bioformatics 20(8):1222–1232.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Molitor J, Papathomas M, Jerrett M, Richardson S (2010) Bayesian profile regression with an application to the national survey of children’s health. Biostatistics 11(3):484–498.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Moore WL, Pessemier EA, Lehmann DL (1986) Hierarchical representations of market structures and choice processes through preference trees. J. Bus. Res. 14(5):371–386.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nedungadi P (1990) Recall and consumer consideration sets: Influencing choice without altering brand evaluations. J. Consumer Res. 17(3):263–276.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ohlssen D, Sharples LD, Spiegelhalter DJ (2007) Flexible random-effects models using Bayesian semi-parametric models: Application to institutional comparisons. Statist. Medicine 26(9):2088–2112.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Park C, Srinivasan V (1994) A survey based method for measuring and understanding brand equity and its extendability. J. Marketing Res. 31(2):271–288.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Pinkse J, Slade M, Brett C (2002) Spatial price competition: A semiparametric approach. Econometrica 70(3):1111–1153.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rodríguez A, Dunson DB, Gelfand AE (2008) The nested Dirichlet process. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 103(483):1131–1154.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Russell GJ, Kamakura WA (1993) Understanding brand competition using micro and macro scanner data. J. Marketing Res. 31(2):289–303.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Sethuraman J (1994) A constructive definition of Dirichlet priors. Statistica Sinica 4:639–650.Google Scholar
  • Sethuraman R (2003) Measuring national brands’ equity over store brands. Rev. Marketing Sci. 1(2):1–26.Google Scholar
  • Shocker AD, Ben-Akiva M, Boccaro B (1991) Consideration set influences on consumer decision-making and choice: Issues, models, and suggestions. Marketing Lett. 2(3):181–197.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shugan SM (2014) Market structure research. Winer SR, Neslin SA, eds. The History of Marketing Science. (World Scientific Publishing, Singapore), 129–164.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Steckel JH, Vanhonacker WR (1993) Cross-validating regression models in marketing research. Marketing Sci. 12(4):415–427.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sudhir K (2001) Competitive pricing behavior in the auto market: A structural analysis. Marketing Sci. 20(1):42–60.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Sullivan MW (1998) How brand names affect the demand for twin automobiles. J. Marketing Res. 35(2):154–165.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Teh YW, Jordan MI, Beal MJ, Blei DM (2006) Hierarchical Dirichlet processes. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 101(476):1566–1581.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tversky A (1972) Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. Psych. Rev. 79(4):281–299.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Verboven F (1996) International price discrimination in the European car market. RAND J. Econom. 27(2):240–268.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wedel M, Zhang J (2004) Analyzing brand competition across subcategories. J. Marketing Res. 41(4):448–456.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Yang S, Allenby GM, Fennell G (2002) Modeling variation in brand preference: The roles of bjective environment and motivating conditions. Marketing Sci. 21(1):14–31.LinkGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.