Do I Follow My Friends or the Crowd? Information Cascades in Online Movie Ratings

References

• Ahluwalia R (2002) How prevalent is the negativity effect in consumer environments? J. Consumer Res. 29(2):270–279.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Anderson LR, Holt CA (1997) Information cascades in the laboratory. Amer. Econom. Rev. 87(5):847–862.Google Scholar
• Banerjee AV (1992) A simple model of herd behavior. Quart. J. Econom. 107(3):797–817.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Banerjee AV (1993) The economics of rumours. Rev. Econom. Stud. 60(2):309–327.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Barasch A, Berger J (2014) Broadcasting and narrowcasting: How audience size affects what people share. J. Marketing Res. 51(3):286–299.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berger J, Heath C (2008) Who drives divergence? Identity signaling, outgroup dissimilarity, and the abandonment of cultural tastes. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 95(3):593–607.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Berry WD, Golder M, Milton D (2012) Improving tests of theories positing interaction. J. Politics 74(3):653–671.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bikhchandani S, Hirshleifer D, Welch I (1992) A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades. J. Political Econom. 100(5):992–1026.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bikhchandani S, Hirshleifer D, Welch I (1998) Learning from the behavior of others: Conformity, fads, and informational cascades. J. Econom. Perspect. 12(3):151–170.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bramoullé Y, Djebbari H, Fortin B (2009) Identification of peer effects through social networks. J. Econometrics 150(1):41–55.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Brown JJ, Reingen PH (1987) Social ties and word-of-mouth referral behavior. J. Consumer Res. 14(3):350–362.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Celen B, Kariv S (2004) Distinguishing informational cascades from herd behavior in the laboratory. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(3):484–498.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen P-Y, Wu S-y, Yoon J (2004) The impact of online recommendations and consumer feedback on sales. Proc. Internat. Conf. Inform. Systems (ICIS 2004) (Association for Information Systems, Atlanta), 711–724.Google Scholar
• Chevalier JA, Mayzlin D (2006) The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. J. Marketing Res. 43(3):345–354.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chintagunta PK, Gopinath S, Venkataraman S (2010) The effects of online user reviews on movie box office performance: Accounting for sequential rollout and aggregation across local markets. Marketing Sci. 29(5):944–959.Link, Google Scholar
• Cho J, Roy S (2004) Impact of search engines on page popularity. Proc. 13th Internat. Conf. World Wide Web (WWW ’04) (ACM, New York), 20–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cialdini RB (2009) Influence: Science and Practice, 5th ed. (HarperCollins, New York).Google Scholar
• Craig KD, Prkachin KM (1978) Social modeling influences on sensory decision theory and psychophysiological indexes of pain. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 36(8):805–815.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dellarocas C (2003) The digitization of word of mouth: Promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms. Management Sci. 49(10):1407–1424.Link, Google Scholar
• Dellarocas C, Narayan R (2006) A statistical measure of a population’s propensity to engage in post-purchase online word-of-mouth. Statist. Sci. 21(2):277–285.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dellarocas C, Gao G, Narayan R (2010) Are consumers more likely to contribute online reviews for hit products or niche products? J. Management Inform. Systems 27(2):127–157.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dellarocas C, Zhang X, Awad NF (2007) Exploring the value of online product reviews in forecasting sales: The case of motion pictures. J. Interactive Marketing 21(4):23–45.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duan W, Gu B, Whinston AB (2008) Do online reviews matter?—An empirical investigation of panel data. Decision Support Systems 45(4):1007–1016.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Duan W, Gu B, Whinston AB (2009) Informational cascades and software adoption on the Internet: An empirical investigation. MIS Quart. 33(1):23–48.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Forman C, Ghose A, Wiesenfeld B (2008) Examining the relationship between reviews and sales: The role of reviewer identity disclosure in electronic markets. Inform. Systems Res. 19(3):291–313.Link, Google Scholar
• Fleder D, Hosanagar K (2009) Blockbuster culture’s next rise or fall: The impact of recommender systems on sales diversity. Management Sci. 55(5):697–712.Link, Google Scholar
• Godes D, Mayzlin D (2004) Using online conversations to study word-of-mouth communication. Marketing Sci. 23(4):545–560.Link, Google Scholar
• Godes D, Silva J (2012) The sequential and temporal dynamics of online opinion. Marketing Sci. 31(3):448–473.Link, Google Scholar
• Heckman JJ (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1):153–161.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hu Y, Li X (2011) Context-dependent product evaluations: An empirical analysis of Internet book reviews. J. Interactive Marketing 25(3):123–133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jussim L, Osgood W (1989) Influence and similarity among friends: An integrative model applied to incarcerated adolescents. Soc. Psych. Quart. 52(2):98–112.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuksov D (2007) Brand value in social interaction. Management Sci. 53(10):1634–1644.Link, Google Scholar
• Kuran T, Sunstein CR (1999) Availability cascades and risk regulation. Stanford Law Rev. 51(4):683–768.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Li X, Hitt LM (2008) Self-selection and information role of online product reviews. Inform. Systems Res. 19(4):456–474.Link, Google Scholar
• Liu Y (2006) Word of mouth for movies: Its dynamics and impact on box office revenue. J. Marketing 70(3):74–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Luhn R (2008) Online user reviews: Can they be trusted? PC World (October 20), http://www.pcworld.com/article/152380/phony_online_reviews.html.Google Scholar
• Manski CF (1993) Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Rev. Econom. Stud. 60(3):531–542.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Marsh C (1985) Back on the bandwagon: The effect of opinion polls on public opinion. British J. Political Sci. 15(01):51–74.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McAllister I, Studlar DT (1991) Bandwagon, underdog, or projection? Opinion polls and electoral choice in Britain, 1979–1987. J. Politics 53(03):720–741.Crossref, Google Scholar
• McPherson M, Smith-Lovin L, Cook JM (2001) Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 27(1):415–444.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moe WW, Schweidel DA (2012) Online product opinions: Incidence, evaluation, and evolution. Marketing Sci. 31(3):372–386.Link, Google Scholar
• Moe WW, Trusov M (2011) The value of social dynamics in online product ratings forums. J. Marketing Res. 48(3):444–456.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Muchnik L, Aral S, Taylor SJ (2013) Social influence bias: A randomized experiment. Science 341(6146):647–651.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Schlosser AE (2005) Posting versus lurking: Communicating in a multiple audience context. J. Consumer Res. 32(2):260–265.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Skrondal A, Rabe-Hesketh S (2004) Generalized Latent Variable Modeling: Multilevel, Longitudinal, and Structural Equation Models (Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sun B, Xie J, Cao HH (2004) Product strategy for innovators in markets with network effects. Marketing Sci. 23(2):243–254.Link, Google Scholar
• Tirrell M (2009) Netflix, Facebook link to show users’ film ratings (update 2). Bloomberg (March 24), http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aIhIqgXMChaU.Google Scholar
• Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Williams R (2006) Generalized ordered logit/partial proportional odds models for ordinal dependent variables. Stata J. 6(1):58–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wu F, Huberman BA (2008) How public opinion forms. Papadimitriou C, Zhang S, eds. Internet and Network Economics, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 5385 (Springer, Berlin), 334–341.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ying Y, Feinberg F, Wedel M (2006) Leveraging missing ratings to improve online recommendation systems. J. Marketing Res. 43(3):355–365.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Zhang J (2010) The sound of silence: Observational learning in the U.S. kidney market. Marketing Sci. 29(2):315–336.Link, Google Scholar