Founder or Joiner? The Role of Preferences and Context in Shaping Different Entrepreneurial Interests

References

• Agarwal R, Ohyama A (2013) Industry or academia, basic or applied? Career choices and earnings trajectories of scientists. Management Sci. 59(4):950–970.Link, Google Scholar
• Ai C, Norton EC (2003) Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Econom. Lett. 80(1):123–129.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Akerlof GA, Kranton RE (2000) Economics and identity. Quart. J. Econom. 115(3):715–753.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Åstebro T, Chen J, Thompson P (2011) Stars and misfits: Self-employment and labor market frictions. Management Sci. 57(11): 1999–2017.Link, Google Scholar
• Audia PG, Rider CI (2006) Entrepreneurs as Organzational Products Revisited (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ).Google Scholar
• Azoulay P, Liu CC, Stuart TE (2014) Social influence given (partially) deliberate matching: Career imprints in the creation of academic entrepreneurs. Working paper, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
• Baron JN, Burton MD, Hannan MT (1996) The road taken: Origins and evolution of employment systems in emerging companies. Indust. Corporate Change 5(2):239–275.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Baron JN, Hannan MT, Burton MD (2001) Labor pains: Change in organizational models and employee turnover in young, high-tech firms. Amer. J. Sociology 106(4):960–1012.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Beckman CM, Burton MD (2008) Founding the future: Path dependence in the evolution of top management teams from founding to IPO. Organ. Sci. 19(1):3–24.Link, Google Scholar
• Bhide A (2000) The Origin and Evolution of New Businesses (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Bird B (1988) Implementing entrepreneurial ideas: The case for intention. Acad. Management Rev. 13(3):442–453.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Boh WF, De-Haan U, Strom RJ (2012) University technology transfer through entrepreneurship: Faculty and students in spin-offs. Working paper, Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation, Kansas City, Missouri.Google Scholar
• Burton MD, Beckman CM (2007) Leaving a legacy: Position imprints and successor turnover in young firms. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 72(2):239–266.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burton MD, Anderson PC, Aldrich HE (2009) Owner founders, nonowner founders and helpers. Reynolds PD, Curtin RT, eds. New Firm Creation in the United States, International Studies in Entrepreneurship (Springer, New York), 115–133.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Burton MD, Sørensen JB, Beckman CM (2002) Coming from good stock: Career histories and new venture formation. Lounsbury M, Ventresca MJ, eds. Research in the Sociology of Organizations (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK), 229–262.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Camerer CF, Lovallo D (1999) Overconfidence and excess entry: An experimental approach. Amer. Econom. Rev. 89(1):59–82.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell BA, Ganco M, Franco AM, Agarwal R (2012) Who leaves, where to, and why worry? Employee mobility, entrepreneurship and effects on source firm performance. Strategic Management J. 33(1):65–87.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Cohen WM, Nelson RR, Walsh JP (2002) Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Sci. 48(1):1–23.Link, Google Scholar
• Ding W, Choi E (2011) Divergent paths to commercial science: A comparison of scientists’ founding and advising activities. Res. Policy 40(1):69–80.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Dobrev SD, Barnett WP (2005) Organizational roles and transition to entrepreneurship. Acad. Management J. 48(3):433–449.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eckhardt JT, Shane SA (2003) Opportunities and entrepreneurship. J. Management 29(3):333–349.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Eesley CE, Hsu DH, Roberts EB (2014) The contingent effects of top management teams on venture performance: Aligning founding team composition with innovation strategy and commercialization environment. Strategic Management J. 35(12):1798–1817.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Elfenbein DW, Hamilton BH, Zenger TR (2010) The small firm effect and the entrepreneurial spawning of scientists and engineers. Management Sci. 56(4):659–681.Link, Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz H (1998) The norms of entrepreneurial science: Cognitive effects of the new university–industry linkages. Res. Policy 27:823–833.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Evans DS, Leighton LS (1989) Some empirical aspects of entrepreneurship. Amer. Econom. Rev. 79(3):519–535.Google Scholar
• Freeman J (1986) Entrepreneurs as organizational products: Semiconductor firms and venture capital firms. Libecap G, ed. Advances in the Study of Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Economic Growth (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), 33–58.Google Scholar
• Gambardella A, Ganco M, Honoré F (2015) Using what you know: Patented knowledge in incumbent firms and employee entrepreneurship. Organ. Sci. 26(2):456–474.Link, Google Scholar
• Gompers P, Lerner J, Scharfstein D (2005) Entrepreneurial spawning: Public corporations and the genesis of new ventures, 1986 to 1999. J. Finance 60(2):577–614.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Goodman LA (2002) How to analyze survey data pertaining to the time bind, and how not to analyze such data. Soc. Sci. Quart. 83(4):925–940.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Halaby CN (2003) Where job values come from: Family and schooling background, cognitive ability, and gender. Amer. Sociol. Rev. 68(2):251–278.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hall RE, Woodward SE (2010) The burden of the nondiversifiable risk of entrepreneurship. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(3):1163–1194.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hamilton BH (2000) Does entrepreneurship pay? An empirical analysis of the returns to self-employment. J. Political Econom. 108(3):604–631.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Hayward MLA, Shepherd DA, Griffin D (2006) A hubris theory of entrepreneurship. Management Sci. 52(2):160–172.Link, Google Scholar
• Hirano K, Imbens GW (2002) Estimation of causal effects using propensity score weighting: An application to data on right heart catheterization. Health Services & Outcomes Res. Methodology 2(3–4):259–278.Google Scholar
• Hsu DH (2008) Technology-based entrepreneurship. Shane S, ed. Handbook of Technology and Innovation Management (John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, UK), 367–388.Google Scholar
• Hsu DH, Roberts EB, Eesley CE (2007) Entrepreneurs from technology-based universities: Evidence from MIT. Res. Policy 36(5):768–788.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Imbens GW (2004) Nonparametric estimation of average treatment effects under exogeneity: A review. Rev. Econom. Statist. 86(1):4–29.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jovanovic B (1979) Job matching and the theory of turnover. J. Political Econom. 87(5):972–991.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kihlstrom R, Laffont J (1979) A general equilibrium entrepreneurial theory of firm formation based on risk aversion. J. Political Econom. 87(4):719–748.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lazear EP (2005) Entreprenreurship. J. Labor Econom. 23(4):649–680.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Lowe RA, Ziedonis AA (2006) Overoptimism and the performance of entrepreneurial firms. Management Sci. 52(2):173–186.Link, Google Scholar
• McClelland DC (1961) The Achieving Society (D. Van Nostrand Company, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Merton RK (1968) Social Theory and Social Structure (Free Press, New York).Google Scholar
• Mischel W (2004) Toward an integrative science of the person. Annual Rev. Psych. 55:1–22.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Moore GE (1994) The accidental entrepreneur. Engrg. Sci. 1994 (Summer):23–30.Google Scholar
• Nanda R, Sørensen JB (2010) Workplace peers and entrepreneurship. Management Sci. 56(7):1116–1126.Link, Google Scholar
• National Research Council (2010) A Data-Based Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs in the United States (National Academies Press, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
• National Science Board (2012) Science and Engineering Indicators 2012 (National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA).Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation (2003) Survey of Doctorate Recipients. Accessed April 3, 2015, http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/srvydoctoratework/survey2003/sdr_2003.pdf.Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation (2009) Doctorate Recipients from U.S. Universities: Summary Report 2007–08. Special Report NSF 10-309. Accessed April 3, 2015, http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsf10309/.Google Scholar
• Neff G (2012) Venture Labor: Work and the Burden of Risk in Innovative Industries (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Owen-Smith J, Powell WW (2001) Careers and contradictions: Faculty responses to the transformation of knowledge and its uses in the life sciences. Res. Sociology Work 10:109–140.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roach M, Sauermann H (2010) A taste for science? Ph.D. scientists’ academic orientation and self-selection into research careers in industry. Res. Policy 39(3):422–434.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Roberts E (1991) Entrepreneurs in High Technology (Oxford University Press, New York).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Robins JM, Hernán MA, Brumback B (2000) Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology. Epidemiology 11(5):550–560.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shane S (2001) Technological opportunities and new firm creation. Management Sci. 47(2):205–220.Link, Google Scholar
• Shane S (2004) Academic Entrepreneurship: University Spinoffs and Wealth Creation (Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shane S, Khurana R (2003) Bringing individuals back in: The effects of career experience on new firm founding. Indust. Corporate Change 12(3):519–543.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Sørensen JB (2007) Bureaucracy and entrepreneurship: Workplace effects on entrepreneurial entry. Admin. Sci. Quart. 52:387–412.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stephan PE (2012) How Economics Shapes Science (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).Crossref, Google Scholar
• Stern S (2004) Do scientists pay to be scientists? Management Sci. 50(6):835–853.Link, Google Scholar
• Stuart T, Ding W (2006) When do scientists become entrepreneurs? The social structural antecedents of commercial activity in the academic life sciences. Amer. J. Sociology 112(1):97–144.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Thursby JG, Jensen R, Thursby MC (2001) Objectives, characteristics and outcomes of university licensing: A survey of major U.S. universities. J. Tech. Transfer 26(1–2):59–72.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turner RH (1978) The role and the person. Amer. J. Sociology 84(1):1–23.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Wasserman N (2012) The Founder’s Dilemmas: Anticipating and Avoiding the Pitfalls That Can Sink a Startup (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).Crossref, Google Scholar