Behavior-Based Pricing: An Analysis of the Impact of Peer-Induced Fairness

References

• Acquisti A, Varian HR (2005) Conditioning prices on purchase history. Marketing Sci. 24(3):367–381.Link, Google Scholar
• Amaldoss W, Jain S (2005) Conspicuous consumption and sophisticated thinking. Management Sci. 51(10):1449–1466.Link, Google Scholar
• Anderson ET, Simester D (2010) Price stickiness and customer antagonism. Quart. J. Econom. 125(2):729–765.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Campbell M (1999) Perceptions of price unfairness: Antecedents and consequences. J. Marketing Res. 36(2):187–199.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Chen Y (2005) Oligopoly price discrimination by purchase history. Pros and Cons of Price Discrimination (Swedish Competition Authority, Stockholm).Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Cui TH (2013) The benefit of uniform price for branded variants. Marketing Sci. 32(1):36–50.Link, Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Iyer G, Pazgal A (2010) Limited memory, categorization, and competition. Marketing Sci. 29(4):650–670.Link, Google Scholar
• Cui TH, Raju JS, Zhang ZJ (2007) Fairness and channel coordination. Management Sci. 53(8):1303–1314.Link, Google Scholar
• Farrell J, Klemperer P (2007) Coordination and lock-in: Competition with switching costs and network effects. Armstrong M, Porter A, eds. Handbook of Industrial Organization, 1st ed., Vol. 3 (Elsevier, Amsterdam), 1970–2072.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Schmidt KM (1999) A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quart. J. Econom. 114(3):817–868.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Feinberg FM, Krishna A, Zhang ZJ (2002) Do we care what others get? A behaviorist approach to targeted promotions. J. Marketing Res. 39(3):277–291.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D, Tirole J (2000) Customer poaching and brand switching. RAND J. Econom. 31(4):634–657.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Fudenberg D, Villas-Boas JM (2006) Behavior-based price discrimination and customer recognition. Hendershott TJ, ed. Handbook on Economics and Information Systems (Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, UK), 377–436.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guo L (2015) Inequity aversion and fair selling. J. Marketing Res. 52(1):77–89.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Guo L, Zhang J (2012) Consumer deliberation and product line design. Marketing Sci. 31(6):995–1007.Link, Google Scholar
• Guo X, Jiang B (2015) Signaling through price and quality to consumers with fairness concerns. Working paper, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Haws KL, Bearden WO (2006) Dynamic pricing and consumer fairness perceptions. J. Consumer Res. 33(3):304–311.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Ho T-H, Su X (2009) Peer-induced fairness in games. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(5):2022–2049.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Huppertz JW, Arenson SJ, Evans RH (1978) An application of equity theory to buyer-seller exchange situations. J. Marketing Res. 15(2):250–260.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Jin L, He Y, Zhang Y (2014) How power states influence consumers’ perceptions of price unfairness. J. Consumer Res. 40(5):818–833.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klemperer P (1987a) Markets with consumer switching costs. Quart. J. Econom. 102(2):375–394.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klemperer P (1987b) The competitiveness of markets with switching costs. RAND J. Econom. 18(1):138–150.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Klemperer P (1995) Competition when consumers have switching costs: An overview with applications to industrial organization, macroeconomics and international trade. Rev. Econom. Stud. 62(4):515–539.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Kuksov D, Villas-Boas JM (2010) When more alternatives lead to less choice. Marketing Sci. 29(3):507–524.Link, Google Scholar
• Loewenstein GF, Thompson L, Bazerman MH (1989) Social utility and decision making in interpersonal contexts. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 57(3):426–441.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Pazgal A, Soberman D (2008) Behavior-based discrimination: Is it a winning play, and if so, when? Marketing Sci. 27(6):977–994.Link, Google Scholar
• Rabin M (1993) Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. Amer. Econom. Rev. 83(5):1281–1302.Google Scholar
• Seaney R (2013) Airfare expert: Do cookies really raise airfares? USA Today (April 30), http://www.usatoday.com/story/travel/columnist/seaney/2013/04/30/airfare-expert-do-cookies-really-raise-airfares/2121981/.Google Scholar
• Shaffer G, Zhang ZJ (2000) Preference-based price discrimination in markets with switching costs. J. Econom. Management Strategy 9(3):397–424.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Shin J, Sudhir K (2010) A customer management dilemma: When is it profitable to reward one’s own customers? Marketing Sci. 29(4):671–689.Link, Google Scholar
• Streitfeld D (2000) On the Web price tags blur: What you pay could depend on who you are. Washington Post (September 27).Google Scholar
• Taylor C (2004) Consumer privacy and the market for customer information. RAND J. Econom. 35(4):631–650.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Turow J, Feldman L, Meltzer K (2005) Open to exploitation: American shoppers online and offline. Report, Annenberg Public Policy Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
• Villas-Boas JM (1999) Dynamic competition with customer recognition. RAND J. Econom. 30(4):604–631.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Villas-Boas JM (2004) Price cycles in markets with customer recognition. RAND J. Econom. 35(3):486–501.Crossref, Google Scholar
• Villas-Boas JM (2009) Product variety and endogenous pricing with evaluation costs. Management Sci. 55(8):1338–1346.Link, Google Scholar
• Washington Internet Daily (2013) Online price discrimination, transparency concerns central to expected DOT rule. 14:168.Google Scholar
• Woolley S (1998) I got it cheaper than you. Forbes (November 2), http://www.forbes.com/forbes/1998/1102/6210082a.html.Google Scholar
• Zhang J (2011) The perils of behavior-based personalization. Marketing Sci. 30(1):170–186.Link, Google Scholar