Employee Recognition and Performance: A Field Experiment

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2291

References

  • Akerlof GA (1982) Labor contracts as partial gift exchange. Quart. J. Econom. 97(4):543–569.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Al-Ubaydli O, List JA (2015) On the generalizability of experimental results in economics: With a response to Camerer. Fréchette GR, Schotter A, eds. Handbook of Experimental Economic Methodology, Chap. 20 (Oxford University Press, New York).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Al-Ubaydli O, Andersen S, Gneezy U, List JA (2015) Carrots that look like sticks: Toward an understanding of multitasking incentive schemes. Southern Econom. J. 81(3):538–561.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allcott H, Rogers T (2014) The short-run and long-run effects of behavioral interventions: Experimental evidence from energy conservation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(10):3003–3037.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Alpizar F, Carlsson F, Johansson-Stenman O (2008) Anonymity, reciprocity, and conformity: Evidence from voluntary contributions to a national park in Costa Rica. J. Public Econom. 92(5–6):1047–1060.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anderson A, Huttenlocher D, Kleinberg J, Leskovec J (2013) Steering user behavior with badges. Proc. 22nd Internat. Conf. World Wide Web (International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, Geneva), 95–106.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ashraf N, Bandiera O, Jack K (2014a) No margin, no mission? A field experiment on incentives for public service delivery. J. Public Econom. 120:1–17.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ashraf N, Bandiera O, Lee SS (2014b) Awards unbundled: Evidence from a natural field experiment. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 100:44–63.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Azmat G, Iriberri N (2010) The importance of relative performance feedback information: Evidence from a natural experiment using high school students. J. Public Econom. 94(7–8):435–452.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bandiera O, Larcinese V, Rasul I (2009) Blissful ignorance? Evidence from a natural experiment on the effect of individual feedback. Mimeo, London School of Economics and Political Science, London.Google Scholar
  • Barankay I (2011a) Rank incentives: Evidence from a randomized workplace experiment. Mimeo, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  • Barankay I (2011b) Rankings and social tournaments: Evidence from a crowd-sourcing experiment. Mimeo, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  • Bareket-Bojmel L, Hochman G, Ariely D (2016) It’s (not) all about the Jacksons—Testing different types of short-term bonuses in the field. J. Management. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  • Benabou R, Tirole J (2003) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Rev. Econom. Stud. 70(3):489–520.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bernheim BD (1994) A theory of conformity. J. Political Econom. 102(5):841–877.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bicchieri C, Xiao E (2009) Do the right thing: But only if others do so. J. Behavioral Decision Making 22(2):191–208.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Blanes i Vidal J, Nossol M (2011) Tournaments without prizes: Evidence from personnel records. Management Sci. 57(10):1721–1736.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Blau PM (1964) Exchange and Power in Social Life (John Wiley & Sons, New York).Google Scholar
  • Bobek DD, Roberts RW, Sweeney JT (2007) The social norms of tax compliance: Evidence from Australia, Singapore, and the United States. J. Bus. Ethics 74(1):49–64.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bradler C, Neckermann S (2013) Money meets gratitude: A field experiment on worker effort. Mimeo, Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW), Mannheim, Germany.Google Scholar
  • Bradler C, Dur R, Neckermann S, Non A (2013a) Employee recognition and performance: A field experiment. ZEW Discussion Paper 13-017, Centre for European Economic Research, Mannheim, Germany.Google Scholar
  • Bradler C, Dur R, Neckermann S, Non A (2013b) The power of surprise: The impact of spontaneous and announced recognition on employee performance. Mimeo, Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW), Mannheim, Germany.Google Scholar
  • Cameron J, Pierce W (1994) Reinforcement, reward, and intrinsic motivation—A meta-analysis. Rev. Educational Res. 64(3):363–423.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Charness G, Masclet D, Villeval M-C (2014) The dark side of competition for status. Management Sci. 60(1):38–55.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chen Y, Harper FM, Konstan J, Li SX (2010) Social comparisons and contributions to online communities: A field experiment on movielens. Amer. Econom. Rev. 100(4):1358–1398.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Cropanzano R, Mitchell MS (2005) Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. J. Management 31(6):874–900.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Danilov A, Sliwka D (2016) Can contracts signal social norms? Experimental evidence. Management Sci. ePub ahead of print February 29 http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2336.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Deci EL, Ryan RM (1971) Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 18(1):105–115.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Delfgaauw J, Dur R, Sol J, Verbeke W (2013) Tournament incentives in the field: Gender differences in the workplace. J. Labor Econom. 31(2):305–326.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dur R (2009) Gift exchange in the workplace: Money or attention? J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 7(2–3):550–560.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ellingsen T, Johannesson M (2008) Pride and prejudice: The human side of incentive theory. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(3):990–1008.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Falk A, Fischbacher U (2006) A theory of reciprocity. Games Econom. Behav. 54(2):293–314.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Falk A, Ichino A (2006) Clean evidence on peer effects. J. Labor Econom. 24(1):39–58.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fehr E, Kirchsteiger G, Riedl A (1993) Does fairness prevent market clearing? An experimental investigation. Quart. J. Econom. 108(2):437–59.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fischer P, Huddart S (2008) Optimal contracting with endogenous social norms. Amer. Econom. Rev. 98(4):1459–1475.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fisher RJ, Ackerman D (1998) The effects of recognition and group need on volunteerism: A social norm perspective. J. Consumer Res. 25(3):262–275.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Freeman RB, Gelber AM (2010) Prize structure and information in tournaments: Experimental evidence. Amer. Econom. J.: Appl. Econom. 2(1):149–164.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Frey BS, Meier S (2004) Social comparisons and pro-social behavior: Testing conditional cooperation in a field experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(5):1717–1722.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gelman A, Hill J (2006) Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gerber AS, Rogers T (2009) Descriptive social norms and motivation to vote: Everybody’s voting and so should you. J. Politics 71(1):178–191.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gneezy U, List J (2006) Putting behavioral economics to work: Field evidence on gift exchange. Econometrica 74(5):1365–1384.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grant AM, Gino F (2010) A little thanks goes a long way: Explaining why gratitude expressions motivate prosocial behavior. J. Personality Soc. Psych. 98(6):946–955.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Gubler T, Larkin I, Pierce L (2016) Motivational spillovers from awards: Crowding out in a multitasking environment. Organ. Sci. 27(2):286–303.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Gul F, Pesendorfer W (2016) Interdependent preference models as a theory of intentions. J. Econom. Theory. 165(September):179–208.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Harrison GW, List JA (2004) Field experiments. J. Econom. Literature 42(4):1009–1055.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hennig-Schmitt H, Rockenbach B, Sadrieh A (2010) In search of worker’s real effort reciprocity—A field and a laboratory experiment. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 8(4):817–837.Google Scholar
  • Holton V, Dent F, Rabbetts J (2009) Motivation and employee engagement in the 21st century: A survey of management views. Report, Ashridge Business School, Hertfordshire, UK.Google Scholar
  • Hoogveld N, Zubanov N (2014) The power of (no) recognition: Experimental evidence from the university classroom. IZA Discussion Paper 7953, Institute for the Study of Labor, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
  • Kosfeld M, Neckermann S (2011) Getting more work for nothing? Symbolic awards and worker performance. Amer. Econom. J.: Microeconomics 3(3):1–16.Google Scholar
  • Kovach KA (1995) Employee motivation: Addressing a crucial factor in your organization’s performance. Employment Relations Today 22(2):93–107.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kube S, Maréchal MA, Puppe C (2012) The currency of reciprocity—Gift exchange in the workplace. Amer. Econom. Rev. 102(4):1644–1662.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kube S, Maréchal MA, Puppe C (2013) Do wage cuts damage work morale? Evidence from a natural field experiment. J. Eur. Econom. Assoc. 11(4):853–870.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kuhnen CM, Tymula A (2012) Feedback, self-esteem and performance in organizations. Management Sci. 58(1):94–113.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levine DK (1998) Modeling altruism and spitefulness in experiments. Rev. Econom. Dynam. 1(3):593–622.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Levitt S, List JA (2009) Field experiments in economics: The past, the present, and the future. Eur. Econom. Rev. 53(1):1–18.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • List JA, Rasul I (2011) Field experiments in labor economics. Ashenfelter O, Card D, eds. Handbook of Labor Economics, 1st ed. Vol. 4 (Elsevier, New York), 103–228.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • McSweeney FK (2004) Dynamic changes in reinforcer effectiveness: Satiation and habituation have different implications for theory and practice. Behav. Analyst 27(2):171–188.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Neckermann S, Yang X (2012) The value of saying thank you: An experiment on the performance consequences of unexpected rewards. Mimeo, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.Google Scholar
  • Neckermann S, Cueni R, Frey BS (2014) Awards at work. Labour Econom. 31(December):205–217.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nelson B (2005) 1001 Ways to Reward Employees, Vol. 2 (Workman Publishing Company, New York).Google Scholar
  • Nolan JM, Schultz PW, Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ, Griskevicius V (2008) Normative social influence is underdetected. Personality Soc. Psych. Bull. 34(7):913–923.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Non A (2012) Gift-exchange, incentives, and heterogeneous workers. Games Econom. Behav. 75(1):319–336.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ockenfels A, Sliwka D, Werner P (2015) Timing of kindness—Evidence from a field experiment. J. Econom. Behav. Organ. 111:79–87.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rhoades L, Eisenberger R (2002) Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. J. Appl. Psych. 87(4):698–714.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Rogers T, Frey E (2015) Changing behavior beyond the here and now. Keren G, Wu G, eds. The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making (John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Schultz PW, Nolan JM, Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ, Griskevicius V (2007) The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psych. Sci. 18(5):429–434.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shang J, Croson R (2009) A field experiment in charitable contribution: The impact of social information on the voluntary provision of public goods. Econom. J. 119(540):1422–1439.Google Scholar
  • Sliwka D (2007) Trust as a signal of a social norm and the hidden costs of incentive schemes. Amer. Econom. Rev. 97(3):999–1012.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Stajkovic AD, Luthans F (2003) Behavioral management and task performance in organizations: Conceptual background, meta-analysis, and test of alternative models. Personnel Psych. 56(1):155–194.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Swank OH, Visser B (2007) Motivating through delegating tasks or giving attention. J. Law, Econom., Organ. 23(3):731–742.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Tran A, Zeckhauser R (2012) Rank as an inherent incentive: Evidence from a field experiment. J. Public Econom. 96(9–10):645–650.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Wagner R, Harter JK (2006) 12: The Elements of Great Managing (Gallup Press, New York).Google Scholar
  • Wiley C (1997) What motivates employees what motivates employees according to over 40 years of motivation surveys. Internat. J. Manpower 18(3):263–280.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.