The Role of Sales Agents in Information Disclosure: Evidence from a Field Experiment

Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2327

References

  • AHRI (Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute) (2013) Residential Automatic Storage Water Heaters Historical Data. Accessed February 5, 2014, http://www.ahrinet.org/site/495/Resources/Statistics/Historical-Data/Residential-Storage-Water-Heaters-Historical-Data.Google Scholar
  • Allcott H (2011) Social norms and energy conservation. J. Public Econom. 95(9–10):1082–1095.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allcott H, Rogers T (2014) The short-run and long-run effects of behavioral interventions: Experimental evidence from energy conservation. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(10):3003–3037.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Allcott H, Taubinsky D (2015) Evaluating behaviorally-motivated policy: Experimental results from the lightbulb market. Amer. Econom. Rev. 105(8):2501–2538.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Al-Ubaydli O, List J (2012) On the generalizability of experimental results in economics. Frechette G, Schotter A, eds. The Methods of Modern Experiments (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK).CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Anagol S, Cole S, Sarkar S (2013) Understanding the advice of commissions-motivated agents: Evidence from the Indian life insurance market. HBS Working Paper 12-055, Harvard Business School, Boston.Google Scholar
  • Anderson D, Claxton J (1982) Barriers to consumer choice of energy efficient products. J. Consumer Res. 9(2):163–170.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Angrist J, Pischke J-S (2012) Probit better than LPM? Accessed January 12, 2016, http://www.mostlyharmlesseconometrics.com/2012/07/probit-better-than-lpm/.Google Scholar
  • Ashraf N, Bandiera O, Jack K (2014) No margin, no mission? A field experiment on incentives for pro-social tasks. J. Public Econom. 120:1–17.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bandiera O, Barankay I, Rasul I (2005) Social preferences and the response to incentives: Evidence from personnel data. Quart. J. Econom. 120(3):917–962.Google Scholar
  • Bandiera O, Barankay I, Rasul I (2009) Social connections and incentives in the workplace: Evidence from personnel data. Econometrica 77(4):1047–1094.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bandiera O, Barankay I, Rasul I (2010) Social incentives in the workplace. Rev. Econom. Stud. 77(2):417–458.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Bandiera O, Rasul I, Barankay I (2007) Incentives for managers and inequality among workers: Evidence from a firm level experiment. Quart. J. Econom. 122:729–775.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Barankay I (2012) Rank incentives: Evidence from a randomized workplace experiment. Working paper, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  • Bhargava S, Manoli D (2013) Why are benefits left on the table? Assessing the role of information, complexity, and stigma on take-up with an IRS field experiment. Working paper, University of Texas at Austin, Austin.Google Scholar
  • Bureau of Labor Statistics (Bureau of Labor Statistics) (2011) Consumer expenditure survey: 2011 expenditure tables. Accessed January 12, 2016, http://www.bls.gov/cex/csxstnd.htm.Google Scholar
  • Bollinger B, Leslie P, Sorensen A (2011) Calorie posting in chain restaurants. Amer. Econom. J.: Econom. Policy 3(1):91–128.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Brandon A, List J, Metcalfe R, Price M (2014) What drives the adoption of energy efficient technologies? Theroleof social information and advertisements. Working paper, University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
  • Chan T, Li J, Pierce L (2014) Compensation and peer effects in competing sales teams. Management Sci. 60(8):1965–1984.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Chatterji A, Findley M, Jensen N, Meier S, Nielson D (2016) Field experiments in strategy research. Strategic Management J. 37(1):116–132.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Choi J, Laibson D, Madrian B (2010) Why does the law of one price fail? An experiment on index mutual funds. Rev. Financial Stud. 23(4):1405–1432.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Davis L, Metcalf G (2014) Does better information lead to better choices? Evidence from energy-efficiency labels. NBER Working Paper 20720, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deutsch M (2010a) Life cycle cost disclosure, consumer behavior, and business implications: Evidence from an online field experiment. J. Indust. Ecology 14(1):103–120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Deutsch M (2010b) The effect of life-cycle cost disclosure on consumer behavior: Evidence from a field experiment with cooling appliances. Energy Efficiency 3(4):303–315.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • DEWHA (Australian Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage, and the Arts) (2008) Regulatory impact statement: Proposal to phase-out inefficient incandescent light bulbs. Accessed July 21, 2014, http://www.energyrating.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/Energy_Rating_Documents/Library/Lighting/Incandescent_Lamps/200808-ris-phaseout.pdf.Google Scholar
  • Dolan P, Metcalfe R (2013) Neighbors, knowledge, and nuggets: Two natural field experiments on the role of incentives on energy conservation. CEP Discussion Paper No. 1222, London School of Economics and Political Science, London.Google Scholar
  • Dranove D, Jin GZ (2010) Quality disclosure and certification: Theory and practice. J. Econom. Literature 48(4):935–963.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Duarte F, Hastings J (2012) Fettered consumers and sophisticated firms: Evidence from Mexico’s privatized social security market. NBER Working Paper 18582, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Duflo E, Saez E (2003) The role of information and social interactions in retirement plan decisions: Evidence from a randomized experiment. Quart. J. Econom. 118(3):815–842.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Duflo E, Gale W, Liebman J, Orszag P, Saez E (2006) Saving incentives for low- and middle-income families: Evidence from a field experiment with H&R Block. Quart. J. Econom. 121(4):1311–1346.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Dupas P (2011) Do teenagers respond to HIV risk information? Evidence from a field experiment in Kenya. Amer. Econom. J.: Appl. Econom. 3(1):1–34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Figlio D, Lucas ME (2004) What’s in a grade? School report cards and the housing market. Amer. Econom. Rev. 94(3):591–604.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fischer C (2005) On the importance of the supply side in demand-side management. Energy Econom. 27(1):165–180.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Fischer C (2010) Imperfect competition, consumer behavior, and the provision of fuel efficiency in light-duty vehicles. RFF Discussion Paper 10-60, Resource for the Future, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Greenstone M, Oyer P, Vissing-Jorgensen A (2006) Mandated disclosure, stock returns, and the 1964 securities acts amendments. Quart. J. Econom. 121(2):399–460.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grossman G, Shapiro C (1984) Informative advertising with differentiated products. Rev. Econom. Stud. 51(1):63–81.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Grossman SJ (1981) The informational role of warranties and private disclosure about product quality. J. Law Econom. 24(3):461–483.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Hastings J, Weinstein J (2008) Information, school choice, and academic achievement: Evidence from two experiments. Quart. J. Econom. 123(4):1373–1414.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Herberich D, List J, Price M (2011) How many economists does it take to change a light bulb? A natural field experiment on technology adoption. Working paper, University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
  • Hoffman F, Inderst R, Ottaviani M (2013) Hypertargeting, limited attention, and privacy: Implications for marketing and campaigning. Working paper, Bocconi University, Milan.Google Scholar
  • Houde S (2014a) How consumers respond to environmental certification and the value of energy information. Working paper, University of Maryland, College Park.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Houde S (2014b) Bunching with the stars: How firms respond to environmental certification. Working paper, University of Maryland, College Park.Google Scholar
  • Ichniowski C, Shaw K (2003) Beyond incentive pay: Insiders’ estimates of the value of complementary human resource management practices. J. Econom. Perspect. 17(1):155–180.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Inderst R, Ottaviani M (2009) Misselling through agents. Amer. Econom. Rev. 99(3):883–908.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Inderst R, Ottaviani M (2012) Financial advice. J. Econom. Literature 50(2):494–512.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Iyengar S, Lepper M (2000) When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? J. Personality Soc. Psych. 79(6):995–1006.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jessoe K, Rapson D (2014) Knowledge is (less) power: Experimental evidence from residential energy use. Amer. Econom. Rev. 104(4):1417–1438.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jin GZ, Leslie P (2009) Reputation incentives for restaurant hygiene. Amer. Econom. J.: Microeconomics 1(1):237–267.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Jin GZ, Sorensen A (2006) Information and consumer choice: The value of publicized health plan ratings. J. Health Econom. 25(2):248–275.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kallbekken S, Saelen H, Hermansen E (2013) Bridging the energy efficiency gap: A field experiment on lifetime energy costs and household appliances. J. Consumer Policy 36(1):1–16.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kahn M (2007) Do greens drive hummers? Environmental ideology as a determinant of consumer choice. J. Environmental Econom. Management 54(2):129–145.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Kling J, Mullainathan S, Shafir E, Vermeulen L, Wrobel M (2012) Comparison friction: Experimental evidence from medicare drug plans. Quart. J. Econom. 127(1):199–235.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Larkin I (2014) The cost of high-powered incentives: Employee gaming in enterprise software sales. J. Labor Econom. 32(2):199–227.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Lazear E (2000) Performance pay and productivity. Amer. Econom. Rev. 90( 5):1346–1361.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Leip D (2013) Dave Leip’s atlas of U.S. presidential elections. Accessed January 12, 2016, http://uselectionatlas.org/.Google Scholar
  • Mantrala M, Albers S, Caldieraro F, Jensen O, Joseph K, Krafft M, Narasimhan C, Gopalakrishna S, Zoltners A, Lal R, Lodish L (2010) Sales force modeling: State of the field and research agenda. Marketing Lett. 21(3):255–272.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milgrom P (1981) Good news and bad news: Representation theorems and applications. Bell J. Econom. 12(2):380–391.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Milgrom P (2008) What the seller won’t tell you: Persuasion and disclosure in markets. J. Econom. Perspect. 22(2):115–132.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Mullainathan S, Noeth M, Schoar A (2012) The market for financial advice: An audit study. NBER Working Paper 17929, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Nagin D, Rebitzer J, Sanders S, Taylor L (2002) Monitoring, motivation, and management: The determinants of opportunistic behavior in a field experiment. Amer. Econom. Rev. 92(4):850–873.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) (2010) Final regulatory impact analysis: Corporate average fuel economy for MY 2012-MY 2016 passenger cars and light trucks. Office of Regulatory Analysis and Evaluation, National Center for Statistics and Analysis, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Newell R, Siikamaki J (2013) Nudging energy efficiency behavior: The role of information labels. Discussion Paper 13-17, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  • Pope D (2009) Reacting to rankings: Evidence from “America’s best hospitals.” J. Health Econom. 28(6):1154–1165.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Scanlon D, Chernew M, McLaughlin C, Solon G (2002) The impact of health plan report cards on managed care enrollment. J. Health Econom. 21(1):19–41.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Shearer B (2004) Piece rates, fixed wages, and incentives: Evidence from a field experiment. Rev. Econom. Stud. 71(2):513–534.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • U.S. Department of Energy (2009) Residential Energy Consumption Survey. Accessed 12, 2016, http://www.eia.gov/consumption/residential/data/2009/.Google Scholar
  • U.S. Department of Energy (2010) Energy Star water heater market profile. Report, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC. https://www.energystar.gov/ia/partners/prod_development/new_specs/downloads/water_heaters/Water_Heater_Market_Profile_2010.pdf.Google Scholar
  • U.S. Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources (2011) Hearing on Appliance Standards Regulation: Testimony of Steven Nadel, Executive Director, American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE). Senate Hearing 112-10, 112th Cong., 1st sess., March 10, 2011.Google Scholar
  • Viscusi WK (1978) A note on “lemons” markets with quality certification. Bell J. Econom. 9(1):277–279.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • Ward D, Clark CD, Jensen KL, Yen ST, Russell CS (2011) Factors influencing willingness-to-pay for the ENERGY STAR label. Energy Policy 39(3):1450–1458.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
INFORMS site uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some are essential to make our site work; Others help us improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Please read our Privacy Statement to learn more.